Data Quality: Census Bureau Needs to Accelerate Efforts to Develop and Implement Data Quality Review Standards: GAO-05-86

November 2004
GAO Reports;11/17/2004, p1
Government Document
Data from the decennial census are used to apportion and redistrict seats in the House of Representatives, distribute billions of dollars of federal funds, and guide the planning and investment decisions of the public and private sectors. Given the importance of these data, it is essential that they meet high quality standards before they are distributed to the public. After questions arose about the quality of certain data from the 2000 Census, the requesters asked GAO to review U.S. Census Bureau (Bureau) standards on the quality of data disseminated to the public. The Bureau did not have detailed agencywide standards for the review of data from the 2000 Census to determine if the data were of sufficient quality for public dissemination. Instead, analysts and managers in different parts of the Bureau primarily used their own judgment and unwritten, program-specific guidance to decide when and whether data should be released and what supporting information should accompany the data. The lack of sufficient data quality review standards led to a variety of problems, including missed opportunities for correcting data before release, inconsistent decisions on disseminating data with similar quality issues, and inadequate communication to users about the reasons for dissemination decisions. As a result, some users of data from the 2000 Census lost confidence in the quality of the data and in the Bureau's review procedures. In the 4 years since the 2000 Census, the Bureau has publicly issued general information quality guidelines, including eight performance principles, and one new standard that allows individuals to request correction of certain errors in data disseminated by the Bureau. Both of these documents resulted from the enactment of the Information Quality Act in 2000 and the subsequent guidelines issued by the Office of Management and Budget in 2002. However, except for the one standard, the Bureau did not provide any specific guidelines or procedures on the implementation of the general guidelines. The Bureau also began work on other standards, including one on minimal information that must be provided with data and another on discussion of errors in data released to the public. Neither has been issued in final form. In response to our earlier recommendations, the Bureau created an interdirectorate working group charged with developing and publicly issuing Bureau-wide standards for quality in data releases. The working group has taken some steps, but the Bureau has not provided information on the scope or the time frame for its efforts to develop these standards. The standards that the Bureau has under development and the activities of the working group are encouraging. However, it will be important for the Bureau to proceed with greater urgency to ensure that fully tested standards are in place for the 2010 Census. Until spring 2004, no additional resources were provided to support the working group, and over a year after it began, it has not issued any new standards or said when it will be ready to do so. A comprehensive, Bureau-wide data quality framework, with interrelated standards, and specific implementing procedures could help ensure consistent decisions about the quality of the data from the next decennial census and conditions under which the data will be disseminated. Moreover, the benefits the Bureau can achieve by developing and effectively implementing comprehensive data quality standards would not be limited to the decennial census. Because they would apply to all data disseminated by the Bureau, it will be important for any new standards to be developed promptly, implemented across the Bureau, and released to the public.


Related Articles

  • 2010 CENSUS: Plans for Decennial Census Operations and Technology Have Progressed, But Much Uncertainty Remains.  // GAO Reports;6/12/2008, preceding p1 

    The article presents a study regarding the plans of the Census Bureau (Bureau) for the U.S. 2010 Census which includes paper-based nonresponse follow-up operation, management of Field Data Collection Automation (FDCA), and the status of the Bureau's integrated 2010 schedule. U.S. Government...

  • Census and Sensibility. Issa, Darell // Ripon Forum;Fall2009, Vol. 43 Issue 4, p8 

    The article discusses the issues the surrounding the 2010 American Census in the U.S. According to the author, the Census is the foundation of the people's representative system of government and the biggest peacetime deployment of resources. The author highlights the challenges and...

  • 2010 Census: Basic Design Has Potential, but Remaining Challenges Need Prompt Resolution: GAO-05-9. Dalton, Patricia A. // GAO Reports;1/12/2005, p1 

    A rigorous testing and evaluation program is a critical component of the census planning process because it helps the U.S. Census Bureau (Bureau) assess activities that show promise for a more cost-effective head count. The Bureau conducted a field test in 2004, and we were asked to (1) assess...

  • 2010 Census: Counting Americans Overseas as Part of the Census Would Not Be Feasible: GAO-04-1077T.  // GAO Reports;9/14/2004, p1 

    The U.S. Census Bureau (Bureau) has typically excluded from the census private citizens residing abroad, but included overseas members of the military, federal civilian employees, and their dependents (in the 1990 and 2000 Censuses, these individuals were included in the numbers used for...

  • 2010 CENSUS: Population Measures Are Important for Federal Funding Allocations.  // GAO Reports;10/29/2007, preceding p1 

    The article discusses the testimony which focuses on the significance of the decennial census in the provision of federal assistance programs to various states in the U.S. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) stresses that data on population estimates help in effectively carrying out the...

  • 2010 Census: Census Bureau Needs to Take Prompt Actions to Resolve Long-standing and Emerging Address and Mapping Challenges: GAO-06-272. Farrell, Brenda S. // GAO Reports;6/15/2006, p1 

    To conduct a successful census, it is important that the U.S. Census Bureau (Bureau) produce the most complete and accurate address file and maps for 2010. For this review, GAO's specific objectives were to determine the extent to which (1) the Bureau's efforts to modernize the address file...

  • Little Time Remains to Address Operational Challenges. Goldenkoff, Robert; Powner, David A. // GAO Reports;3/5/2009, preceding p1 

    The article presents a report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) that highlights the readiness of the Census Bureau for the 2010 Decennial Census. It notes that the census is constitutionally mandated to generate data needed to reapportion congressional seats and allocation of...

  • American Community Survey: Key Unresolved Issues: GAO-05-82. Parker, Robert P. // GAO Reports;10/7/2004, p1 

    The Congress asked GAO to review operational and programmatic aspects of the Census Bureau's ACS that will affect the reliability of small geographic area data. The ACS will be a mail survey of about 3 million households annually, whose results will be cumulated over 5 years to produce estimates...

  • Efforts to Build an Accurate Address List Are Making Progress, but Face Software and Other Challenges.  // GAO Reports;10/21/2009, preceding p1 

    The article discusses the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)'s report and recommendations for the U.S. Census Bureau's accurate address list. It mentions that census is a constitutionally mandated activity that produces data to be used to allocate congressional seats, and federal...


Read the Article

Other Topics