TITLE

NASA's Space Vision: Business Case for Prometheus 1 Needed to Ensure Requirements Match Available Resources: GAO-05-242

AUTHOR(S)
Li, Allen
PUB. DATE
February 2005
SOURCE
GAO Reports;2/28/2005, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Documents
DOC. TYPE
Report
ABSTRACT
In 2003, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) initiated the Prometheus 1 project to explore the outer reaches of the Solar System. The Prometheus 1 spacecraft is being designed to harness nuclear energy that will increase available electrical power from about 1,000 watts to over 100,000 watts and enable the use of electric propulsion thrusters. Historically, NASA has had difficulty implementing some initiatives. NASA's failure to adequately define requirements and quantify the resources needed to meet those requirements has resulted in some projects costing more, taking longer, and achieving less than originally planned. Prometheus 1 will need to compete for NASA resources with other space missions--including efforts to return the shuttle safely to flight and complete the International Space Station. GAO was asked to determine (1) whether NASA is establishing initial justification for its investment in the Prometheus 1 project and (2) how the agency plans to ensure that critical technologies will be sufficiently mature at key milestones. NASA is in the process of establishing initial justification for its investment in the Prometheus 1 project but faces challenges establishing preliminary requirements and developing accurate cost estimates. Decision makers will not get their first comprehensive picture of the project's requirements and the resources needed to meet those requirements until the preliminary mission and systems review, scheduled for summer 2005. Defining the project's requirements and developing life-cycle cost estimates by then could be challenging, given the short time frames. The fidelity of this information should improve by the preliminary design review scheduled for 2008. At that time, NASA has the opportunity to use these more refined requirements and cost estimates to establish a sound business case for its investment in the Prometheus 1 project. According to Prometheus 1 project management, a flat funding profile is inadequate to ramp up for the planned 2015 launch of Prometheus 1, the project's first spacecraft to its original destination of Jupiter's Icy Moons. By matching requirements to resources a sound business case would allow NASA to determine whether trade-offs in the design of the spacecraft or the agency's expectations are needed to avoid outstripping available resources. Significant program cost and schedule increases in past programs can be traced to not matching requirements with resources at preliminary design review. While development of the Prometheus 1 technologies is under way, each will require extensive advancement before they are mature enough to support reliable cost estimates. NASA is preparing technology development plans that include measurable criteria to ensure the Prometheus 1 technologies are on track for meeting NASA's maturity requirements through the end of the preliminary design phase. GAO's best practices work has shown, however, that establishing a formal business case based on a knowledge-based approach that includes matching requirements and available resources--which include technical and engineering knowledge, time, and funding--and controls to ensure that sufficient knowledge has been attained at critical junctures within the product development process is an essential part of any product development justification. NASA's current policy does not require projects to develop knowledge-based business cases that match requirements to available resources and include controls to ensure that sufficient knowledge has been attained. Therefore, the agency had not planned to develop such a business case for Prometheus 1. Since GAO provided our draft report to NASA for comment, the agency released its fiscal year 2006 budget request that includes changes to Prometheus 1. If properly implemented, these changes could be positive steps in addressing the findings and recommendations in this report.
ACCESSION #
18174668

 

Related Articles

  • GAO: NASA Fails to Budget for Delays, Cost Overruns in Delta 2 Replacement Strategy. Hill, Jeffrey // Satellite News;12/1/2010, Vol. 33 Issue 48, p1 

    The article offers information on the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)'s new directive to the National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA) over the latter's strategy on the replacement for the Delta 2 launch vehicle. GAO found that NASA doesn't have a plan for an affordable and...

  • Constellation Program Cost and Schedule Will Remain Uncertain Until a Sound Business Case Is Established. Chaplain, Cristina T. // GAO Reports;9/25/2009, preceding p1 

    The article presents a study conducted by the U.S. Government Accountability Office regarding the uncertainty issue cited on the Constellation program cost and schedule of the National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA). GAO cites the challenges encountered by NASA on its operations,...

  • NASA: GAO-08-581T. Chaplain, Cristina T. // GAO Reports;4/24/2008, p1 

    The International Space Station (ISS), the most complex scientific space project ever attempted, remains incomplete. NASA expects the station's final construction cost will be $31 billion and expects sustainment costs through the station's planned retirement in fiscal year 2016 to total $11...

  • NASA: More Knowledge Needed to Determine Best Alternatives to Provide Space Station Logistics Support: GAO-05-488. Li, Allen // GAO Reports;5/18/2005, p1 

    The National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) space shuttle fleet has been key to International Space Station operations. Since the grounding of the fleet in February 2003, Russia has provided logistics support. However, due to the limited payload capacity of the Russian space...

  • GAO Assessment of Selected NASA Projects.  // Aerospace Daily & Defense Report;4/9/2015, Vol. 252 Issue 7, p6 

    The article presents a graph showing an assessment of selected projects of the U.S. National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA) like commercial crew, and space launch system by the U.S. Government Accountability Office in context with the budget request made by NASA for Fiscal Year 2015.

  • NASA Delays First SLS Launch Until No Later Than November 2018. Host, Pat // Defense Daily;8/28/2014, p7 

    The article reports the move by the U.S. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in late August 2014 to delay the launching of its Space Launch System (SLS) heavy lift, exploration class rocket until no later than November 2018. The agency also conducted a Key Decision Point C...

  • NASA Taking Measures to Manage Delays and Risks. Chaplain, Cristina T. // GAO Reports;5/26/2011, preceding p1 

    The article presents a research study conducted by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on the strategies of the U.S. National Aeronautics Administration (NASA) for the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS). It notes that the findings of the study reveal that Space X and...

  • Medium Launch Transition Strategy Leverages Ongoing Investments but Is Not Without Risk.  // GAO Reports;11/22/2010, preceding p1 

    The article presents a report from the Government Accountability Office (GAO) in the U.S. on the launch services program (LSP) of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). It notes that the program aims to address risks and ensures the success of the last planned Delta II...

  • Space Shuttle: Costs for Hubble Servicing Mission and Implementation of Safety Recommendations Not Yet Definitive: GAO-05-34.  // GAO Reports;11/19/2004, p1 

    Hubble's continued operation has been dependent on manned servicing missions using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) shuttle fleet. The fleet was grounded in early 2003 following the loss of the Space Shuttle Columbia, as NASA focused its efforts on responding to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics