TITLE

Charter Schools: To Enhance Education's Monitoring and Research, More Charter School-Level Data Are Needed: GAO-05-5

AUTHOR(S)
Shaul, Marnie S.
PUB. DATE
January 2005
SOURCE
GAO Reports;1/12/2005, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Document
DOC. TYPE
Report
ABSTRACT
Charter schools are public schools that are granted increased autonomy by states in exchange for meeting specified academic goals. State law determines who approves the formation of a charter school, often the board of education. As public schools, charter schools are subject to the performance requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLBA) as well. In this environment, states' systems for allowing charter schools flexibility and ensuring school performance and financial integrity assume greater importance. GAO examined (1) how states allow charter schools flexibility, (2) how states promote accountability for school performance and financial integrity for charter schools, (3) the implications of NCLBA for charter schools, and (4) the role the Department of Education (Education) plays in charter school accountability. GAO surveyed the 39 states and jurisdictions with operating charter schools in 2002-03 and interviewed charter school experts and Education officials. In school year 2002-03, some states reported that they provided charter schools flexibility by allowing them to choose their authorizer. Authorizers--state education agencies, local education agencies, universities, and other nonprofit organizations--oversee the formation and operation of charter schools. Also, nearly all states provided flexibility by releasing charter schools from some traditional public school requirements, such as teacher hiring and termination practices, schedules, and collective bargaining agreements. To promote charter school performance and financial integrity, states reported that they took action to oversee charter schools and to oversee and provide assistance to authorizers. About half of the 39 states reported having primary responsibility for enforcing school improvement actions in charter schools not achieving annual school performance goals under NCLBA. Most states reported that they intervened when authorizers were not performing their responsibilities and conducted or required audits of authorizers' finances. About half of the states assisted authorizers with funding for their charter school oversight responsibilities or gave them fee collection authority. NCLBA requires charter schools to meet the same requirements as other public schools, but the law permits certain flexibilities where allowed by state law. Charter schools must be included in the statewide assessment system, and charter schools that receive NCLBA Title I funds must take school improvement actions if they do not meet state performance goals. However, NCLBA allows state law to determine the entity responsible for charter school oversight. In addition, while NCLBA requires certification for all other teachers to meet the highly qualified teacher requirement, the law exempts charter school teachers from this requirement where state law permits. As it does for all public schools, Education administers grant programs that provide funds to charter schools, monitors grant performance, and sponsors research on accountability for academic performance and financial integrity. Under NCLBA, the department and states must ensure that new and expanding charter schools receive timely payment of federal grant funds for which they are eligible and meet the act's academic achievement goals. However, in its monitoring and data collection, Education gathers little information on the timeliness of charter school grant payments or how well the schools perform. Moreover, Education's Office of the Inspector General (OIG) reported delays in states' Title I payments to charter schools. Education is in the process of developing new systems that are expected to provide both academic performance and financial reports for the department's major grant programs, but the ability of the new systems to provide financial reports for charter schools is uncertain.
ACCESSION #
18174568

 

Related Articles

  • Minn. Law Spurs Some Districts to Rethink Sponsoring Charters. Aarons, Dakarai I. // Education Week;7/14/2010, Vol. 29 Issue 36, p15 

    The article presents an overview of reaction, both positive and negative, which has been seen in response to changes to a Minnesota law which is focused on strengthening accountability for authorizers who sponsor and oversee the state's charter schools. A discussion of the impact changes in the...

  • Education Could Do More to Assist Charter Schools with Applying for Discretionary Grants. Ashby, Cornelia M. // GAO Reports;12/7/2010, preceding p1 

    The article presents a study conducted by U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) on the application for discretionary grants to assist charter schools in the U.S. It speculates on the eligibility for charter schools in applying for federal discretionary grant programs as well as the role of...

  • Ohio Poised to Reorganize Charter School Oversight. Hendrie, Caroline // Education Week;12/11/2002, Vol. 22 Issue 15, p13 

    Offers a look at a legislative bill in Ohio that would specify the role of state education officials in overseeing the state's charter school sector. Provisions in the bill for the easing up of restrictions on charter schools; Coalition trying to overturn Ohio's charter law; Shift in who can...

  • Charter Schools.  // Inside Tucson Business;8/9/2004, Vol. 14 Issue 6, Special section p12 

    Lists the charter schools in Tucson, Arizona operating as of August 2004. Academy of Tucson; Presidio High School; Khalsa Montessori School; Talented and Gifted Charter School.

  • No Clear Edge for Charter Schools Found in 15-State Study. Maxwell, Lesli A. // Education Week;7/14/2010, Vol. 29 Issue 36, p14 

    The article reports on the results of a study which examined charter schools in 15 U.S. states and was conducted by Mathematica Policy Research of Princeton, New Jersey. The results, released in June of 2010, found that students who had won lotteries to attend charter middle schools did not...

  • The controversy over charter school scores reinforces a partisan split. Colgan, Craig // American School Board Journal;Oct2004, Vol. 191 Issue 10, p6 

    Reports on the controversy over the charter school student test in the U.S. Overview of the result of the analysis on charter school student test data conducted by the American Federation of Teachers; Comparison on the performance between the students in charter and traditional public schools;...

  • Dangerous minds. Kelly, Michael // New Republic;12/30/96, Vol. 215 Issue 27, p6 

    Opposes the establishment of charter schools in the U.S. by detailing a violent incident arising from Afrocentric Marcus Garvey Public Charter School managed by its principal Mary A. T. Anigbo. Description of Marcus Garvey's curriculum; Attack against reporter Susan Ferrechio by Anigbo and her...

  • The New School. Finn Jr., Chester E.; Manno, Bruno V.; Bierlein, Louann; Vanourek, Gregg // National Review;9/15/1997, Vol. 49 Issue 17, p48 

    The article describes the success and increasing popularity of charter schools in the United States. The success of charter schools have challenged three axioms about education in the country. These axioms say that only private schools can avoid bureaucratic micromanagement, that school choice...

  • Former charter school official in Michigan faces criminal fraud charges.  // American School & University Exclusive Insight;10/8/2012, p8 

    The article reports that the ex-director of a charter school in Muskegon Township, Michigan, confronts multiple felony charges of fraudulently getting stage school aid and falsifying school records.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics