TITLE

Water Quality: Program Enhancements Would Better Ensure Adequacy of Boat Pumpout Facilities in No-Discharge Zones: GAO-04-613

AUTHOR(S)
Stephenson, John B.
PUB. DATE
May 2004
SOURCE
GAO Reports;5/24/2004, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Government Document
DOC. TYPE
Report
ABSTRACT
Clean Water Act regulations generally prohibit boats from discharging untreated sewage but allow the discharge of treated sewage using certified marine sanitation devices. The act allows states to designate "no-discharge zones"--areas in which vessels are prohibited from discharging any sewage--if the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finds that adequate facilities exist in such zones for the removal and treatment of sewage from vessels. In some cases, such as for drinking water intake zones, EPA makes the designation. As requested, this report assesses (1) EPA's process for determining the adequacy of facilities to remove and treat sewage in proposed no-discharge zones; (2) the extent to which EPA and the states ensure that adequate facilities remain available after designation; (3) the extent to which the Coast Guard and the states enforce discharge prohibitions; and (4) various effects of no-discharge zones, as identified by EPA, states, and localities. EPA's process for determining whether adequate facilities are reasonably available to remove and treat sewage from boats in proposed no-discharge zones could be improved. EPA currently requires states to submit general estimates of need for facilities (known as pumpouts) in state applications for no-discharge zones, but other information that would support site-specific estimates is optional. As a result, EPA does not receive this information consistently. Moreover, EPA generally makes its determinations on adequacy without site visits to evaluate the facilities identified in the applications to ensure, for example, that they are accessible and functioning. GAO found no EPA and limited state oversight of pump-out facilities after no-discharge zones are established. The Clean Water Act does not address the monitoring of such facilities in established no-discharge zones, nor does it define a specific role for EPA after the agency has initially determined that the facilities are adequate. Because the success of no-discharge zones depends in large measure on adequate facilities, GAO believes that EPA should assess the continued adequacy of these facilities, seeking additional authority, if needed, to require periodic recertifications or reassessments. The Coast Guard limits its enforcement of no-discharge prohibitions to the three federally designated no-discharge zones; it does not enforce them in the 56 state-designated zones. While the Clean Water Act grants the Coast Guard authority to enforce in all no-discharge zones, Coast Guard's regulations exercise enforcement authority only in areas where discharges are prohibited by EPA regulations--currently the three federally designated zones. EPA and others were not aware of the Coast Guard's regulatory limitation of its enforcement authority. GAO found that states enforced in different ways, such as by issuing tickets or inspecting boats. Many states place more emphasis on boater education than on penalizing violators. Although few data are available to assess the effects of no-discharge zones, a number of EPA, state, and local officials believe that water quality and environmental stewardship have increased after designation of these zones. In addition, officials cite gallons of boat sewage pumped as evidence that no-discharge zones reduce water pollution.
ACCESSION #
18174156

 

Related Articles

  • GAO suggests engine incentives.  // Commercial Carrier Journal;Apr2004, Vol. 161 Issue 4, p16 

    Focuses on the recommendations given by the U.S. General Accounting Office for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to address fleet concerns about cost, reliability and availability of machines complying with the 2007 diesel emissions standard. Factors that could delay the benefits...

  • GAO Criticizes TSCA in Senate Hearing. Seewald, Nancy // Chemical Week;8/9/2006, Vol. 168 Issue 26, p13 

    The article reports on the criticism of the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) against the Toxic Substances Control Act. GAO told the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency needs additional authorities under legislation to improve its...

  • Meeting small system needs will be challenging, GAO reports. Crow, Patrick // WaterWorld;Mar99, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p6 

    Focuses on the United States General Accounting Office's assessment of states' compliance with implementation of the 1996 Safe Drinking Water Act. Initiatives by states in setting up their drinking water revolving funds; Role of the US Environmental Protection Agency in completing contaminant...

  • Wastewater Discharge Rules Evolving to Protect Watersheds. Clark, Dave // WaterWorld;Jan2011, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p1 

    The article discusses the effort of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to enforce regulations which stem from the Clean Water Act. It states that the regulations emphasize on nutrient control, restrictions on ammonia criteria, and the development of water quality criteria for...

  • Effects of aerobic and anaerobic digestion systems on pathogen and pathogen indicator reduction in municipal sludge. Dahab, M. F.; Surampalli, R. Y. // Water Science & Technology;2002, Vol. 46 Issue 10, p181 

    In this study, the effectiveness of anaerobic treatment systems in reducing pathogenic density levels was evaluated under the US EPA municipal sludge rule (40 CFR Part 503 Rule). Wastewater and sludge samples were analyzed for both pathogens and pathogenic indicator organisms from six different...

  • Putting Bacteria To Work: Its Only Natural.  // Pollution Engineering;May2002, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p43 

    Evaluates the natural benefits of bioaugmentation at municipal wastewater treatment plants in the U.S. Maintenance of the Environmental Protection Agency standards; Importance of proper monitoring; Use of activated sludge process the City of Keene, New Hampshire Wastewater Treatment Plant.

  • Alkaline stabilization of biosolids can save money, space. Oerke, David W. // WaterWorld;Mar99, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p14 

    Discusses the benefits for wastewater treatment plants that use the alkaline stabilization method to achieve Class A or Class B biosolids treatment levels. Cost considerations in choosing the alkaline stabilization system; Typical unit costs for Class A lime stabilization and thermal drying;...

  • NRDC URGES FEDERAL CLEAN WATER TRUST FUND.  // Journal: American Water Works Association;Jun2004, Vol. 96 Issue 6, p28 

    Provides information on the "Swimming in Sewage" report prepared by the Natural Resources Defense Council and the Environmental Integrity Project which urged the U.S. government to strengthen enforcement of clean water regulations. Comments from the American Water Works Association about the...

  • Clean Water Act: Proposed Revisions to EPA Regulations to Clean Up Polluted Waters: RCED-00-206R.  // GAO Reports;6/21/2000, p1 

    Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the economic and compliance issues associated with two proposed Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations to clean up polluted waters, focusing on: (1) the reasonableness of EPA's economic analyses for the two proposed regulations; and...

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics