TITLE

'Fido'-Fido theories Philosophy

PUB. DATE
January 2002
SOURCE
Dictionary of Theories;2002, p202
SOURCE TYPE
Book
DOC. TYPE
Reference Entry
ABSTRACT
A definition of the term "fido-fido theories" is presented. It is a term used in philosophy which explains some concept in terms of a direct relation to an object. The meaning says that the meaning of a word is an object it stands for.
ACCESSION #
40422468

 

Related Articles

  • A Reductio of Kripke-Wittgenstein's Objections to Dispositionalism about Meaning. Hohwy, Jakob // Minds & Machines;May2003, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p257 

    A central part of Kripke's influential interpretation of Wittgenstein's sceptical argument about meaning is the rejection of dispositional analyses of what it is for a word to mean what it does (Kripke, 1982). In this paper I show that Kripke's arguments prove too much: if they were right, they...

  • causal theories of meaning Philosophy.  // Dictionary of Theories;2002, p81 

    A definition of the term "causal theory of meaning " is presented. The term refers to theories which explain the meaning of a word or sentence in terms of its effect on the hearer, or in terms of the cause of its utterance by the speaker. Such theories are also sometimes called...

  • A Defense of Lucky Understanding. Morris, Kevin // British Journal for the Philosophy of Science;Jun2012, Vol. 63 Issue 2, p357 

    It is plausible to think that the epistemic benefit of having an explanation is understanding. My focus in this article is on the extent to which explanatory understanding, perhaps unlike knowledge, is compatible with certain forms of luck—the extent to which one can understand why...

  • A normative account of the need for explanation. Wong, Wai-hung; Yudell, Zanja // Synthese;Oct2015, Vol. 192 Issue 9, p2863 

    Although explanation is a central topic in the philosophy of science, there is an important issue concerning explanation that has not been discussed much, namely, why some phenomena need an explanation while some do not. In this paper we first explain why this is an important issue, and then...

  • use theories of meaning Philosophy.  // Dictionary of Theories;2002, p542 

    Information about use theories of meaning is presented. These philosophical theories state that the meaning of a word or sentence is to be found in its use and not in its correspondence to some entity. One may object that use is different from meaning.

  • de facto and de jure theories of meaning Philosophy.  // Dictionary of Theories;2002, p136 

    Information on de facto and de jure theories of meaning is presented. De facto theories give the meaning of a word in terms of how it is actually used, while de jure theories give it in terms of how it should be used.

  • Health Warning.  // Teaching History;Jun2011, Issue 143, p42 

    The article presents several tables which outline instructional strategies that allow students to develop skills to explain information they have been taught through the use of description, identification, and historical empathy.

  • Embodiment and abstraction: Actions create relational representations. Jeremiah J. Trudeau; James A. Dixon // Psychonomic Bulletin & Review;Oct2007, Vol. 14 Issue 5, p994 

    Theories of embodied, modal representation propose that concepts are grounded in the sensorimotor system. According to these theories, action (or the potential for action) creates meaning. An apparent challenge for these theories is the fact that higher-order relations (i.e., relations among...

  • Tidman on critical reflection. Steup, Matthias // Analysis;1996, Vol. 56 Issue 4, p277 

    A response from the author of the article "Critical reflection: an alleged epistemic duty" within the issue is presented.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics