TITLE

Will the Real ID Please Stand Up?

AUTHOR(S)
Jeffery, Duane
PUB. DATE
September 2006
SOURCE
Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Sep/Oct2006, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p32
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Proceeding
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on the symposium entitled "Will the Real Intelligent Design Please Stand Up?," which took place on June 17, 2006 in Salt Lake City. It is reported that the program included four speakers and a closing panel discussion on intelligent design and its significance on metaphysical naturalism. Brent Slife, the professor of psychology at Brigham Young University in Utah, opened the program.
ACCESSION #
25757854

 

Related Articles

  • Wedging Creationism into the Academy. Forrest, Barbara; Branch, Glenn // Academe;Jan/Feb2005, Vol. 91 Issue 1, p36 

    Discusses the quest for academic legitimacy for the intelligent design theory. Highlights of several conferences on intelligent design held by its proponents, including William Dembski, directors of the Michael Polanyi Center at Baylor University in Waco, Texas; Culture wars on the...

  • How Not to Attack Intelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical Misconceptions About Methodological Naturalism. Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan // Foundations of Science;Aug2010, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p227 

    In recent controversies about Intelligent Design Creationism (IDC), the principle of methodological naturalism (MN) has played an important role. In this paper, an often neglected distinction is made between two different conceptions of MN, each with its respective rationale and with a different...

  • What is wrong with intelligent design? Dawes, Gregory // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Apr2007, Vol. 61 Issue 2, p69 

    While a great deal of abuse has been directed at intelligent design theory (ID), its starting point is a fact about biological organisms that cries out for explanation, namely “specified complexity” (SC). Advocates of ID deploy three kind of argument from specified complexity to the...

  • Designed for Controversy: the Religious Right's New Creationism. Boston, Rob // Humanist;Jan/Feb2006, Vol. 66 Issue 1, p35 

    This article focuses on the controversy over the constitutionality of teaching intelligent design in U.S. schools. The article wonders what the court's ruling would be on the first legal challenge to intelligent design. Some arguments raised against teaching intelligent design in schools are...

  • What Makes a Theory Testable, or Is Intelligent Design Less Scientific Than String Theory? Ehrlich, Robert // Physics in Perspective;Mar2006, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p83 

    I compare the theory of intelligent design to string theory to see on what basis, if any, only the former can be justifiably excluded as being scientific.We shall see that the classic criterion of testability or falsifiability is sometimes not so straightforward, and that there are other...

  • Intelligent Design: Scientific Theory or Religious Conviction? Greenawalt, Kent // Journal of Church & State;Spring2003, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p237 

    Analyzes the religious and scientific aspects of the theory of intelligent design. Comparison between Darwin's evolution theory and the creation theory; Evidence which support the theory; Inferences of intelligent design theory; Issues on teaching religion.

  • THE SECULARITY OF INTELLIGENT DESIGN. Curtis, Finbarr // Hedgehog Review;Summer2011, Vol. 13 Issue 2, p68 

    An essay on legal or scientific argument related to intelligent design (ID). It focuses on the implications of equal time rhetoric for the secularity of American political institutions. It explores how ID proponents invoke liberal virtues of tolerance and intellectual freedom. Meanwhile, it...

  • Glorious Wild Things. O'Leary, Denyse // Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity;Jun2007, Vol. 20 Issue 5, p26 

    The author comments on the Intelligent Design (ID) controversy. According to him, what this hypothesis can do is enable scientists to investigate instances in nature that show evidence of design as opposed to ignoring them, explaining them away, or declaring them to be outside science. He argues...

  • Doctors on Evolution. Cavanagh, Sean // Education Week;6/8/2005, Vol. 24 Issue 39, p13 

    This article reports that sixty-three percent of physicians believe that the theory of evolution is more correct than belief in intelligent design, though the responses vary significantly by religion. The survey was conducted by the Louis Finkelstein Institute for Social and Religious Research,...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics