TITLE

Once Unified: The Supreme Court Split On Affirmative Action

AUTHOR(S)
CRIDER, CATHERINE
PUB. DATE
September 2013
SOURCE
University of San Francisco Law Review;Fall2013, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p337
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Opinion
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the U.S Supreme Court split over affirmative action created in Executive Order 10925. It discusses court cases based on affirmative action in education including Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke and Grutter v. Bollinger as well as Gratz v. Bollinger. It also discusses the Supreme Court case Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District Number based on the race discrimination in school districts.
ACCESSION #
97210285

 

Related Articles

  • RATINGS FETISHISM. GARFIELD, LESLIE YALOF // Review of Law & Social Change;2015, Vol. 39 Issue 3, p409 

    The article discusses how affirmative action advocates need of move beyond the diversity in education in the U.S., as of October 2015. Topics discussed include constitutionality of race-consciousness; race-based admissions policies of American colleges and universities; race-conscious...

  • INCOME INTEGRATION AS A RACE-NEUTRAL PURSUIT OF EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY IN EDUCATION AFTER THE PARENTS INVOLVED IN COMMUNITY SCHOOLS DECISION. Weeden, L. Darnell // University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy;Dec2010, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p365 

    The article discusses the feasibility of using income integration as a race-neutral tool in pursuing the U.S. Constitution's equal protection of law principle in the public elementary and secondary schools in the country. It cites the case Parents Involved in Community Schools versus Seattle...

  • Law of the Intangible: Desegregation, Diversity, and the Individual. Britt, Theron // College Literature;Summer2008, Vol. 35 Issue 3, p142 

    This essay examines two related U.S. Supreme Court cases concerning school desegregation, "Brown v. Board of Education" 347 U.S. 483 (1954) and" Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1," 551 U.S._____(2007) and argues that United States law regarding race is based...

  • PARENTS INVOLVED: THE MANTLE OF BROWN, THE SHADOW OF PLESSY. Powell, John A.; Menendian, Stephen // University of Louisville Law Review;Summer2008, Vol. 46 Issue 4, p631 

    The article explores the historical interpretations of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Supreme Court's ruling in the Parents Involved case. It argues that the Court's anticlassification principle is not supported by the central meaning and legacy of Brown. It states that the decision has...

  • THE PROMISE AND PITFALLS OF EMPIRICISM IN EDUCATIONAL EQUALITY JURISPRUDENCE. Epperson, Lia // Wake Forest Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p489 

    No abstract available.

  • The Demise of BROWN vs. Board of Education?: Creating a Blueprint to Achieving Racial Justice in the 21st Century. Ogletree Jr., Charles J. // Crisis (15591573);Jan/Feb2007, Vol. 114 Issue 1, Special section p1 

    The article deals with the U.S. Supreme Court cases Parents Involved in Community School versus Seattle and Meredith versus Jefferson County Board of Education. The justices will decide as early as spring of 2007 whether or not school districts may employ policies specifically designed to...

  • Fisher v. University of Texas: Race Preference in University Admissions Survives Another Round. GRAGLLA, LINO A. // University of San Francisco Law Review;Fall2013, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p273 

    The article discusses the U.S Supreme Court case Fisher v. University of Texas based on the admission preference given by state universities to some applicants on the basis of their race. Topics discussed include the Supreme Court decision in case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka that made...

  • RACIAL PREFERENCE VERSUS NONDISCRIMINATION. Crawford, Curtis // Society;Mar/Apr2004, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p51 

    This article considers the court cases Grutter versus Bollinger and Gratz versus Bollinger in relation to racial preference and nondiscrimination in school admission. The litigation of the two cases revealed large racial inequalities in the treatment of applicants with similar academic...

  • RACIAL PREFERENCE VERSUS NONDISCRIMINATION. Crawford, Curtis // Society;Mar/Apr2004, Vol. 41 Issue 3, p51 

    This article considers the court cases Grutter versus Bollinger and Gratz versus Bollinger in relation to racial preference and nondiscrimination in school admission. The litigation of the two cases revealed large racial inequalities in the treatment of applicants with similar academic...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics