Bower, Alicia
January 2012
Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review;Winter2012, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p555
Academic Journal
In its May 2011 Brown v. Plata decision, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld a remedial order that required the potential release of a shockingly large number of California prison inmates. The Court found that, because of overcrowding in its prisons, California had failed to provide adequate health care to its prisoners--a failure that constituted a systemwide violation of the Eighth Amendment's Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause. In order to reach its ultimate result, however, the Court had to confront the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), a statute that Congress had enacted to combat precisely the type of prison reform litigation that Plata embodied. In the end, the Court found its way through the PLRA's requirements and, in the process, reinforced a strong judicial prerogative to fashion remedies, which now more clearly includes the rare structural injunction.


Related Articles

  • ALTERNATIVES TO INCARCERATION : WHY IS CALIFORNIA LAGGING BEHIND? Vitiello, Michael // Georgia State University Law Review;Summer2012, Vol. 28 Issue 4, p1275 

    The article focuses on the problem of increasing prison population and incarceration rate in California and offers information on alternatives available to the criminal justice system to reduce effect of the problem in California. It analyzes the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court in Brown v....

  • Plata v. Brown and Realignment: Jails, Prisons, Courts, and Politics. Schlanger, Margo // Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p165 

    The article discusses several proposals regarding enactments of institutional reform litigation in America in relation to jails, prisons, and courts as of April 2013, focusing on the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in the 2011 case Brown v. Plata which deals with American constitutional law and...

  • OUR BROKEN DEATH PENALTY. FLETCHER, WILLIAM A. // New York University Law Review;Jun2014, Vol. 89 Issue 3, p805 

    The article presents a speech entitled "Our Broken Death Penalty" by U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Judge William A. Fletcher which was delivered as the James Madison Lecture at the New York University School of Law on October 15, 2013. According to the article, the U.S. Supreme...

  • Victims and the Supreme Court's Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence in Miller v. Alabama: A Tale of a Constitutive Paradox for Victims. Garvin, Meg // New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement;Spring2013, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p303 

    "Law is most usefully seen ... as a branch of rhetoric; and that the kind of rhetoric of which law is a species is most usefully seen not, as rhetoric usually is, either as a failed science or as the ignoble art of persuasion, but as the central art by which community and culture are...

  • The Privatization of Prisons and Prisoner Healthcare: Addressing the Extent of Prisoners' Right to Healthcare. Bondurant, Brittany // New England Journal on Criminal & Civil Confinement;Spring2013, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p407 

    The following are tragic stories of prisoners subjected to irresponsible privatized healthcare companies, along with the many cases of neglect that have been deliberated by the United States Supreme Court. This Note concerns the privatization of healthcare within the nation's prison systems, and...

  • EXTENDING HOPE INTO "THE HOLE": APPLYING GRAHAM V. FLORIDA TO SUPERMAX PRISONS. Allen, Joseph B. // William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal;Oct2011, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p217 

    The article discusses the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case Graham v. Florida and its impact upon so-called supermax prison facilities. The author argues that the reach of the U.S. Constitution's cruel and unusual punishment clause be expanded in order to bar prolonged detentions in...

  • Prison Litigation Reform Act.  // Probation & Parole Law Reports;Sep/Oct2011, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p71 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case Brown v. Plata wherein the Court affirmed an order reducing California's prison population by 37,000 in two years in accordance with provisions within the Prison Litigation Reform Act.

  • DEFINING "SUFFICIENTLY SERIOUS" IN CLAIMS OF CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT. Bach, George // Drake Law Review;Fall2013, Vol. 62 Issue 1, p1 

    When analyzing inmate claims brought under the Eighth Amendment's ban on cruel and unusual punishment and that arise from conditions of confinement, courts employ a two-pronged approach, which asks (1) whether the injury was "objectively, sufficiently serious," and (2) whether the prison...

  • A Modest Proposal. Rapaport, Elizabeth // Brooklyn Law Review;Spring2012, Vol. 77 Issue 3, p1089 

    The article discusses the status of the elderly death row population in prisons across the U.S. as of March 2012, focusing on the proposal that such individuals are too old to be executed under the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution which prohibits the use of cruel and unusual...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics