TITLE

We must speak together

PUB. DATE
October 2015
SOURCE
American City & County Exclusive Insight;10/5/2015, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Opinion
ABSTRACT
The author discusses the increase in the cost of political campaigns in the U.S. and the need to educate affected Americans about voting law changes to stop it. He mentions the U.S. Supreme Court rulings on the Citizens United v the Federal Elections Commission which prohibits the government from limiting the independent political expenditures. He also suggets to local governments to encourage their citizens to do their own political research instead of listening to advertisements.
ACCESSION #
110200753

 

Related Articles

  • Making value-smart purchases. Radar, Eric // Between the Lines (10807551);9/2/2010, Issue 1835, p13 

    The article focuses on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Citizens United case that businesses have the right to spend any amount on political campaigns. This ruling was criticized by many public interest groups and other institutions which acknowledge its potential negative impact on...

  • FOREIGN NATIONALS, ELECTORAL SPENDING, AND THE FIRST AMENDMENT. MASSARO, TONI M. // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Spring2011, Vol. 34 Issue 2, p663 

    The article analyzes whether foreign speakers or corporations can be restricted from making political campaign contributions despite the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Citizens United v. Federal Elections Committee (FEC) case. The Court ruled that the First Amendment rights of corporations...

  • Toxic politics. Buchanan, John M. // Christian Century;11/26/2014, Vol. 131 Issue 24, p3 

    The author discusses two U.S. Supreme Court decisions including removing restrictions on amounts that can be contributed to political campaigns and upholding the laws on voter identification and their impact on political campaigns. He argues about manipulation of the political process brought...

  • THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE DEBATE AFTER CITIZENS UNITED. Kang, Michael S. // Georgia State University Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p1147 

    The author offers his insight on campaign finance law debate on the Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (FEC) in the U.S. He describes the decision of Citizens United that restrictions on corporate electioneering in federal elections are unconstitutional. He notes...

  • OPENING THE FLOODGATES?: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND CORPORATE POLITICAL ACTIVITY AFTER CITIZENS UNITED. Persinger, John // Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy;2012, Vol. 26 Issue 1, p327 

    The article focuses on the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court case judgment in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) on corporate governance and corporate political activity. Topics include the U.S. Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, the increase in political campaign donations...

  • Wild West On K Street? Vaida, Bara; Stone, Peter H. // National Journal;1/30/2010, p1 

    The article focuses on the Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission. In January 2010 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that corporations and unions can contribute to electoral campaigns, deciding that they have the same First Amendment rights as private individuals. This is expected to make...

  • Congress Can Help Repair Ruling's Damage. Taylor, Stuart // National Journal;1/30/2010, p11 

    The article focuses on the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. It states that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to uphold the right of non-profit corporations to fund political campaigns, reportedly criticized by many, was correct. The idea that such would bring in more...

  • Citizens United. Gizzi, John // Human Events;2/1/2010, Vol. 66 Issue 5, p22 

    The author expresses his views on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the campaign finance case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. He emphasizes that the Supreme Court ruled that corporations and unions are now free to spend their money to support candidates for federal...

  • Courts and Congress Respond to Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Sharkey, Brian P. // Young Lawyer;May2010, Vol. 14 Issue 7, p1 

    The article focuses on the controversies surrounding the judgment of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. It discusses the court's decision to strike down the ban on corporate political expenditure. It further states that court's ruling overturned...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics