TITLE

SMALL v. UNITED STATES: certiorari to the United States court of appeals for the third circuit

PUB. DATE
January 2009
SOURCE
Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Law
DOC. TYPE
Legal Material
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Small v. United States, case number 03-750, argued on November 3, 2004 and decided on April 26, 2005. The petitioner was convicted by a Japanese court for attempting to smuggle firearms and ammunition into Japan. Upon his return to the U.S., he purchased a gun which resulted to his arrest for illegal possession of firearm which is punishable by imprisonment. He invoked his right to challenge his conviction. However, the District Court and the Third Circuit rejected his argument.
ACCESSION #
19092071

 

Related Articles

  • QUESTIONABLE USES OF CANONS OF STATUTORY INTERPRETATION: WHY THE SUPREME COURT ERRED WHEN IT DECIDED "ANY" ONLY MEANS "SOME.". Engel, Anthony L. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Spring2006, Vol. 96 Issue 3, p877 

    This article presents a discussion of the issues involved in the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Small v. United States. The case involved the interpretation of the words "convicted in any court" in the U.S. Criminal Code's unlawful gun possession statute. The Supreme Court ruled that the words...

  • EMPIRICAL QUESTIONS AND EVIDENCE IN RITA V. UNITED STATES. Hofer, Paul J. // Denver University Law Review;2007, Vol. 85 Issue 1, p27 

    The article looks at the empirical questions raised by the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in "Rita v. United States" regarding federal sentencing guidelines. It is pointed out that the important question was not the impact of rejecting or adopting the presumption of reasonableness in the...

  • RITA, DISTRICT COURT DISCRETION, AND FAIRNESS IN FEDERAL SENTENCING. Adelman, Lynn; Deitrich, Jon // Denver University Law Review;2007, Vol. 85 Issue 1, p51 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on "Rita v. United States" regarding federal sentencing guidelines and urge the district courts to implement the discretion that the "Rita" decision has reaffirmed. The sentencing landscape is also examined, including the obstacles that the...

  • JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court Johnson v. United States, case number 99-5153, argued on February 22, 2000 and decided on May 15, 2000. The petitioner was granted a supervised release in 1995, but violated two conditions of his release which prompted the District Court to...

  • ILLINOIS v. WARDLOW: certiorari to the supreme court of illinois.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Illinois v. Wardlow, case number 98-1036, argued on November 2, 1999 and decided on January 12, 2000. The respondent was arrested by two police officers when he fled upon seeing police vehicles on an area known for narcotics trafficking...

  • ILLINOIS v. WARDLOW: certiorari to the supreme court of illinois.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Illinois v. Wardlow, case number 98-1036, argued on November 2, 1999 and decided on January 12, 2000. The respondent was arrested by two police officers when he fled upon seeing police vehicles on an area known for narcotics trafficking...

  • RITA NEEDS GALL — HOW TO MAKE THE GUIDELINES ADVISORY. Gertner, Nancy // Denver University Law Review;2007, Vol. 85 Issue 1, p63 

    The article argues that the changes in the federal sentencing guidelines as a result of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in "Rita v. United States" needs additional course correction by the highest court to make sentencing fully consistent with the decision in "United States v. Booker." It is...

  • AN APPELLATE PERSPECTIVE OF FEDERAL SENTENCING AFTER BOOKER AND RITA. Sutton, Jeffrey S. // Denver University Law Review;2007, Vol. 85 Issue 1, p79 

    The article presents the perspective of a circuit judge of a U.S. court of appeals on federal sentencing guidelines after the U.S. Supreme Court's decisions in "Rita v. United States" and "Booker v. United States." It also looks at the three categories of district-court sentences, which have...

  • From Booker to Gall: The Evolution of the Reasonableness Doctrine as Applied to White-Collar Criminals and Sentencing Variances. Kannenberg, Casey C. // Journal of Corporation Law;Fall2008, Vol. 34 Issue 1, p349 

    The article discusses the role of court cases United States v. Booker and Gall v. United States on the country's federal sentencing scheme and the doctrine of reasonableness to white-collar criminal sentences. The author explores the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, which introduced a broad...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics