Classification of medical errors and preventable adverse events in primary care: a synthesis of the literature

Elder, Nancy C.; Dovey, Susan M.
November 2002
Journal of Family Practice;Nov2002, Vol. 51 Issue 11, p927
Academic Journal
journal article
Objective: To describe and classify process errors and preventable adverse events that occur from medical care in outpatient primary care settings.Study Design: Systematic review and synthesis of the medical literature.Data Sources: We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library from 1965 through March 2001 with the MESH term medical errors, modified by adding family practice, primary health care, physicians/family, or ambulatory care and limited the search to English-language publications. Published bibliographies and Web sites from patient safety and primary care organizations were also reviewed for unpublished reports, presentations, and leads to other sites, journals, or investigators with relevant work. Additional papers were identified from the references of the papers reviewed and from seminal papers in the field.Outcomes Measured: Process errors and preventable adverse events.Results: Four original research studies directly studied and described medical errors and adverse events in primary care, and 3 other studies peripherally addressed primary care medical errors. A variety of quantitative and qualitative methods were used in the studies. Extraction of results from the studies led to a classification of 3 main categories of preventable adverse events: diagnosis, treatment, and preventive services. Process errors were classified into 4 categories: clinician, communication, administration, and blunt end.Conclusions: Original research on medical errors in the primary care setting consists of a limited number of small studies that offer a rich description of medical errors and preventable adverse events primarily from the physician's viewpoint. We describe a classification derived from these studies that is based on the actual practice of primary care and provides a starting point for future epidemiologic and interventional research. Missing are studies that have patient, consumer, or other health care provider input.


Related Articles

  • "July Effect": Impact of the Academic Year-End Changeover on Patient Outcomes. Young, John Q.; Ranji, Sumant R.; Wachter, Robert M.; Lee, Connie M.; Niehaus, Brian; Auerbach, Andrew D. // Annals of Internal Medicine;9/6/2011, Vol. 155 Issue 5, p309 

    Background: It is commonly believed that the quality of health care decreases during trainee changeovers at the end of the academic year. Purpose: To systematically review studies describing the effects of trainee changeover on patient outcomes. Data Sources: Electronic literature search of...

  • Reducing medical errors in primary care. Keenan, Craig R.; Adubofour, Kwabena; Daftary, Ashok V.; Pinkowish, Mary Desmond // Patient Care;Dec2003, Vol. 37 Issue 12, p28 

    Presents study which offered ways on reducing medical errors in primary care. Estimate of the number of incidence of medical mistakes in the U.S.; Types of medical errors; Errors in ambulatory care; Discussion of the basic principles of system redesign in medicine. INSET: Flow sheets,...

  • The errors of our ways.  // CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal;7/23/2002, Vol. 167 Issue 2, p113 

    Editorial. Comments on medical errors which may occur in hospitals. Canadian study of medical error by Ross Baker and Peter Norton; Lack of a systemic national approach in Canada for monitoring and preventing medical error; Detection of adverse events through medical malpractice claims; Belief...

  • MAKING CARE SAFE. Stoever, Jane // Annals of Family Medicine;May2003, Vol. 1 Issue 1, p0 

    Looks at progress in studying medical errors in the United States. Creation of an error reporting system; Development of a description/categorization of the errors; Establishment of the Developmental Center for Research and Evaluation in patient safety in primary care.

  • Patient Error: A Preliminary Taxonomy. Buetow, Stephen; Kiata, Liz; Liew, Tess; Kenealy, Tim; Dovey, Susan; Elwyn, Glyn // Annals of Family Medicine;May/Jun2009, Vol. 7 Issue 3, p223 

    The article presents a research which examines the types of errors that patients can contribute and help manage in primary care in Auckland, New Zealand. There were eleven nominal group interviews of patients and primary health care professionals during late 2007. Taxonomy is an approach used to...

  • Reducing medical errors in primary care. Keenan, Craig R.; Adubofour, Kwabena; Daftary, Ashok V. // Patient Care for the Nurse Practitioner;Dec2003, Vol. 6 Issue 12, p4 

    The article focuses on the errors committed in primary care in the U.S. A recent prospective cohort study of 4 Boston-area, adult primary care practices found that 25% of patients had had an adverse drug event (ADE). Of these, 11% were preventable, that is, caused by an error. The overall error...

  • Consumer satisfaction with primary care provider choice and associated trust. Chu-Weininger, Ming Ying L.; Balkrishnan, Rajesh // BMC Health Services Research;2006, Vol. 6, p139 

    Background: Development of managed care, characterized by limited provider choice, is believed to undermine trust. Provider choice has been identified as strongly associated with physician trust. Stakeholders in a competitive healthcare market have competing agendas related to choice. The...

  • PCTs 'being ordered to create a surplus'.  // Pulse;1/5/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 1, p3 

    Reveals that the South West Peninsula Strategic Health Authority has put pressure on primary care trusts to create a surplus.

  • Glasgow GPs strike deal to aim for maximum quality points.  // Pulse;2/9/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 6, p12 

    Reports that all 200 general physicians in Glasgow, Scotland will get the maximum quality aspiration pay after they struck a deal with their primary care trust to aspire to all 1,050 points. Benefits of the practices that aspire to the maximum level.

  • Scotland complaints rise.  // Pulse;2/9/2004, Vol. 64 Issue 6, p12 

    Reports on the increase in the written complaints from patients about primary care services in Scotland in 2003.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics