TITLE

MILWAUKEE RADIO PUBLIC FILE DATA, 1998-2011: AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF ISSUE ADVERTISING AFTER THE BCRA AND CITIZENS UNITED

AUTHOR(S)
Terry, Christopher; Bard, Mitchell
PUB. DATE
April 2013
SOURCE
University of Florida Journal of Law & Public Policy;Apr2013, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p157
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Essay
ABSTRACT
An essay is presented on the political advertising on the radio with reference to the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission of the U.S Supreme Court. Topics discussed non-candidate political advertising on radio in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, impact of adoption of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA) and BCRA preventing issue ads from identifying candidates in spots. It mentions a study suggesting use of radio to broadcast messages to specific demographic groups.
ACCESSION #
94137919

 

Related Articles

  • I'll Believe It When I "C" It: Rethinking § 501(c)(3)'s Prohibition on Politicking. Rigterink, Jennifer // Tulane Law Review;2011, Vol. 86 Issue 2, p493 

    The United States Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. FEC challenged fundamental notions of free speech jurisprudence. While many commentators have focused on the decision's implications for corporate speech, this Comment examines whether the new First Amendment paradigm announced in...

  • THE INCORPORATION OF DEMOCRACY: JUSTICE KENNEDY'S PHILOSOPHY OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN CITIZENS UNITED. Schaeffer, Jarrod L. // Boston University Law Review;Oct2011, Vol. 91 Issue 5, p1783 

    The article examines the judicial philosophy of U.S. Supreme Court justice Anthony Kennedy concerning the 2010 case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission and the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA) of 2002. The author suggests that the Citizens United should be viewed as Kennedy's...

  • McCain-Feingold AND FREE SPEECH: President Barack Obama and major media outlets have chastised the Supreme Court for its ruling overturning McCain-Feingold prohibitions on corporations airing political ads. Kenny, Jack // New American (08856540);3/15/2010, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p10 

    The article discusses issues concerning the U.S. Supreme Court's decision to overturn prohibitions on corporations airing political advertisements under the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 or the McCain-Feingold Act. President Barack Obama castigated the Supreme Court for granting freedom...

  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--ELECTIONS: CITIZENS DIVIDED: BALANCING THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH AND THE ROLE OF PRIVATE CORPORATIONS IN OUR NATION'S ELECTIONS. Martindale, Nathan R. // North Dakota Law Review;2010, Vol. 86 Issue 3, p619 

    In Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the United States Supreme Court lifted a decades-long ban on independent corporate political expenditures. An ideologically-divided Court delivered a 5-4 split decision overturning Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce and part of McConnell v....

  • MONEY CHANGES Everything. EPPS, GARRETT // American Prospect;May2012, Vol. 23 Issue 4, p32 

    The article discusses the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010. It infers that the Court's ruling on corporate personhood has resulted in the use of large amounts of untraceable money for political advertisements. Critics...

  • Groups Try to Cut Flow of Election Bucks.  // Multichannel News;1/23/2012, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p25 

    The article focuses on the Citizens United decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling which permits corporations and unions to fund electioneering advertisements for and against political candidates in the run-up to election primaries. As stated, decision was a financial boon to...

  • A New Discourse Theory of the Firm After Citizens United. Siebecker, Michael R. // George Washington Law Review;Nov2010, Vol. 79 Issue 1, p161 

    The article discusses a new discourse theory of the firm following the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. FEC in 2010. The court has granted to corporations the same political speech rights as individuals in the case. The need for firms to have a greater voice in the deliberative...

  • A Bigger Boom Box. Rauber, Paul // Sierra;May/Jun2010, Vol. 95 Issue 3, p22 

    The article discusses a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) which allows corporations to contribute an unlimited amount of money to candidates in federal elections. Topics include an overview of the environmental concerns as a...

  • Four Questions for 2010. D'Aprile, Shane // Politics (Campaigns & Elections);Mar2010, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p15 

    The article discusses several issues related to the ruling on the case of Citizens United in the U.S. It states that the Federal Election Commission (FEC) will discuss the framework on expenditures and new coordination rules at a public hearing on March 2 and 3, 2010. It adds that small donor...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics