Clarifying Creationism: Five Common Myths

Numbers, Ronald L.
March 2011
History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences;2011, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p129
Academic Journal
The essay seeks to explain creationism and subvert five myths the author has identified concerning the subject and creationists. He first denies that creationists believe in the fixity of species and the perfect design of the world. He distinguishes between young-earth creationists and intelligent-design (ID) theorists. He then explains that creationists are not against science save for evolutionary principles and comments on the global character of the subject.


Related Articles

  • EVOLUCIÓN: ¿UNA TEORÍA? AZNAVURIAN, AVEDIS // Ludus Vitalis;2009, Vol. 17 Issue 32, p221 

    This paper reviews the status of evolutionary and natural selection theories, based on their solidity as scientific stances. Recent analysis that confirm and discuss some of its fundaments are considered, specially those given by researchers in the biological sciences, as well as the diverse...

  • Perelman’s Pseudo-Argument as Applied to the Creationism Controversy. Haarscher, Guy // Argumentation;Aug2009, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p361 

    If you want to challenge or at least weaken the adhesion to a system of values, you can basically adopt two radically opposed rhetorical strategies. Either you will attack the system in a frontal way: for instance, fundamentalists or fascists deny any validity to democratic values and human...

  • Scientists and Literalists. Born, Daniel // Common Review;Spring2006, Vol. 4 Issue 4, p4 

    This article comments on the debate between evolutionary theorists and creationists over the narrative of Genesis 1 and 2. It reports on a federal judge's ruling that prohibited the proponents of intelligent design in the Dover, Pennsylvania school district to present their viewpoint in biology...

  • An exploratory examination of Islamic values in science education: Islamization of science teaching and learning via constructivism. Taşkın, Özgür // Cultural Studies of Science Education;Dec2014, Vol. 9 Issue 4, p855 

    This exploratory study outlines the perceptions of four Muslim graduate students regarding Islam and its influence on their approach to the teaching and learning of science. All of the four interviewees were enrolled in science related programmes at a Midwestern US university. The interview...

  • How Not to Attack Intelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical Misconceptions About Methodological Naturalism. Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan // Foundations of Science;Aug2010, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p227 

    In recent controversies about Intelligent Design Creationism (IDC), the principle of methodological naturalism (MN) has played an important role. In this paper, an often neglected distinction is made between two different conceptions of MN, each with its respective rationale and with a different...

  • Whither "Intelligent Design" Creationism? Lerner, Lawrence S. // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jul/Aug2009, Vol. 29 Issue 4, p18 

    The article discusses the historical and philosophical evolution of "intelligent design" creationism. It explores on various related concepts of creationism which have helped creationists to introduce the supernatural works into observable nature. It also talks about the biological concepts...

  • The Evolutionary Origins of Genetic Information. Freeland, Stephen // Perspectives on Science & Christian Faith;Dec2011, Vol. 63 Issue 4, p240 

    Any living branch of science achieves progress by testing new ideas. The results of these tests determine whether each new idea is accepted as a change to what we thought we knew, is dismissed as incorrect, or simply stagnates, owing to a lack of clear evidence. For evolutionary theory, one such...

  • Intelligent Design: A Response. Hadley, Martin // Australasian Science;Jan/Feb2006, Vol. 27 Issue 1, p46 

    Comments on a Christian lobby group's arguments for the teaching of intelligent design as an alternative to the teaching of evolution. Belief of the group regarding creation and the Book of Genesis; Criticisms against taking the text of Genesis literally; Advice on debating with a scientist...

  • EDITORIAL.  // Australasian Science;Jul2007, Vol. 28 Issue 6, p1 

    The author comments on the advocacy of Doctor John Ashton of the Royal Australian Chemical Institute (RACI) of intelligent design (ID). Ashton received harsh criticism from the scientific community due to his support of ID. Tas Wager of the of Creation of Ministries International accuses...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics