TITLE

Amend the Constitution To Restore Public Trust in the Political System: A Practitioner's Perspective on Campaign Finance Reform

AUTHOR(S)
Udall, Senator Tom
PUB. DATE
September 2010
SOURCE
Yale Law & Policy Review;Fall2010, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p235
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Essay
ABSTRACT
An essay on the decision of U.S. Supreme Court on Citizens United's campaign finance reform is presented. The author states that Supreme Court's decision favoring the campaign finance system of Citizens that allow unlimited funding of big corporations and unions for a candidate opens an interest in the campaign dollars that could add to new risks of corruption in politics. The author suggests for constitutional amendment that would restore integrity of legislative process and elections.
ACCESSION #
59668749

 

Related Articles

  • Public Citizen Generates Local Support to Undo Citizens United. Samuels, Dorry // Public Citizen News;May/Jun2012, Vol. 32 Issue 3, p1 

    The article discusses this periodical's efforts to overturn the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission that allowed corporations to spend unlimited amounts from their treasuries to influence elections. This periodical has called for a constitutional...

  • THE SYSTEM ISN'T BROKEN, IT'S FIXED: ENDING BIG MONEY AND CORPORATIONS IN OUR ELECTIONS. Coleridge, Greg // University of Toledo Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p541 

    In this article the author discusses political influence of large corporations especially in elections campaigns and reflects on the corrupt political process in the U.S. It highlights the need for constitutional amendment regarding constitutional rights and regulation of political spending and...

  • Court's Campaign Money Ruling Is a RED HERRING. Morris, Jane Anne // Progressive Populist;3/15/2010, Vol. 16 Issue 5, p10 

    The article focuses on the decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court concerning the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC). According to the author, the decision is a gift to the right wing due to the reactions of mainstream media, in full denial that it is a red herring....

  • BEHIND THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE DUSTUP. Parloff, Roger // Fortune International (Europe);3/1/2010, Vol. 161 Issue 3, p50 

    The article focuses on the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ruling states that corporations and individuals have identical first amendment rights. The article discusses the repercussions of the ruling, gives specifics on how the Supreme...

  • BEHIND THE CAMPAIGN FINANCE DUSTUP. Parloff, Roger // Fortune;3/1/2010, Vol. 161 Issue 3, p72 

    The article focuses on the January 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. The ruling states that corporations and individuals have identical first amendment rights. The article discusses the repercussions of the ruling, gives specifics on how the Supreme...

  • MR. PRECEDENT. Mencimer, Stephanie // Mother Jones;May/Jun2011, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p54 

    The article presents a profile of lawyer James Bopp, whose practice focuses on campaign-finance law. Bopp has been involved in prominent court cases including Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. His litigation in favor of removing campaign contribution limits and keeping the names of...

  • Campaign Finance and Free Speech.  // Congressional Digest;Sep2010, Vol. 89 Issue 7, p193 

    The article examines campaign finance reform in the United States. The piece was written as a response to the U.S. Supreme Court decision "Citizens United v. the Federal Election Commission." A number of topics are addressed including the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 and the impact of...

  • Should Media Consultants Really Jump for Joy? D'Aprile, Shane // Politics (Campaigns & Elections);Mar2010, Vol. 31 Issue 3, p14 

    The article talks about the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the case of Citizens United and the potential response to media consultants to the decision. It cites several disadvantages such as the rise in expenditures, creating a strategic problem for candidate campaigns, more airway clutter, and...

  • Campaign Finance: Remedies Beyond the Court. Potter, Trevor; Morgan, Bryson B. // Democracy: A Journal of Ideas;Winter2013, Issue 27, p38 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's decision on a case involving Citizens United and its impact on campaign finance in the country as of 2013. It states that the case and other subsequent ones led to an increase in the campaign funds. It mentions the narrow definition of corruption...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics