TITLE

Promises, promises

AUTHOR(S)
Finnegan, William
PUB. DATE
August 1995
SOURCE
New Yorker;8/7/95, Vol. 71 Issue 23, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
Opinion. Discusses why the actions done by the West in Bosnia could be considered as empty threats. Difficulty in selling American-led intervention to stop genocide in the Balkans to sell politically in the United States.
ACCESSION #
9508213998

 

Related Articles

  • Korea in Flux. Kyung Ae-Park // Pacific Affairs;Winter2000/2001, Vol. 73 Issue 4, p499 

    Introduces a series of articles which focused on the politics and government of North Korea.

  • Helping to Keep the Peace (Albeit Reluctantly): China's Recent Stance on Sovereignty and Multilateral Intervention. Carlson, Allen // Pacific Affairs;Spring2004, Vol. 77 Issue 1, p9 

    Examines the stance of China on sovereignty and multilateral and humanitarian operations. Analysis of China's position on the role of sovereignty in international politics and international intervention within international system; Response of Chinese to the changing international environment;...

  • THE "LESSONS" OF VIETNAM AND SOVIET FOREIGN POLICY. Zimmerman, William; Axelrod, Robert // World Politics;Jan81, Vol. 33 Issue 2, p1 

    This study systematically identifies the Soviet lessons of Vietnam as presented in eleven Soviet newspapers (specializecl and regional as well as the central papers) and eight journals. Altogether, 1,585 citations were coded, representing more than 70 different lessons. A predominant finding is...

  • The Palestine Wound Festers, Always. Hegland, Corine // National Journal;11/17/2001, Vol. 33 Issue 46-47, p3594 

    Explains the reasons for the failure of the United States to intervene in the conflict between Israel and Palestine. Background on the Palestinian crisis; Support for Israel in the condemnation of terrorist organizations; Military occupation of Israel in Palestinian territory.

  • Where Are the Great Powers? Luttwak, Edward N. // Foreign Affairs;Jul/Aug1994, Vol. 73 Issue 4, p23 

    Analyzes the reasons why great powers refuse to tolerate combat in embattled nations. Democracy; `Mothernism' and family; Constrictions to use of force; Low birth rates; Ways for a great power to retain status without sacrificing principles; Cases.

  • SEVER DIPLOMATIC RELATIONS? Buckley, W.M.F. // National Review;5/3/1985, Vol. 37 Issue 8, p62 

    Presents the interview between the author and the U.S. Secretary of State regarding the international relationship between the U.S. and the government of Nicaragua. Clarification of the offer of aid to armed militants with plans to overthrow the government under international law; Obligation of...

  • IS NEWS OF "SOVEREIGNTY'S DEATH" EXAGGERATED? Kornfelc, Itzchak // ILSA Journal of International & Comparative Law;Spring2012, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p315 

    The article presents information on the disorientation in the foreign policy of the U.S. and the concept of international relations that is governed by public international law. The importance of sovereignty, right to monopolize and problems related to the international intervention in the...

  • ESTABLISHING A NEUTRALITY POLICY FOR AMERICA.  // Congressional Digest;Jan1936, Vol. 15 Issue 1, p3 

    Focuses on the debate over the neutrality policy of the United States. Origin of public interest in neutrality; Proposed prohibition of the export of arms, ammunition to implements of war; Threat of a filibuster.

  • THIS PEACE IS A CHEAT. Gunther, John // Saturday Evening Post;11/27/1937, Vol. 210 Issue 22, p5 

    Analyzes several questionable issues in politics as of November 1937. Independence of Manchukuo, a semi-autonomous division of the Chinese Republic; Italian quest of Ethiopia; Non-intervention pact in regard to the Spanish civil war.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics