TITLE

In the Dark

PUB. DATE
January 2012
SOURCE
Columbia Journalism Review;Jan/Feb2012, Vol. 50 Issue 5, p4
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The editor reflects on the impact of various legal interpretations of the U.S. First Amendment on campaign-finance law and argues that the amendment has been misconstrued to support moneyed influence. The article comments on the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court "Citizens United" case, the influence of Indiana lawyer James Bopp on gay-rights legislative processes, and anti-disclosure movements.
ACCESSION #
70272129

 

Related Articles

  • LET THE PEOPLE SPEAK: THE CASE FOR A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO REMOVE CORPORATE SPEECH FROM THE AMBIT OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT. Weissman, Robert // Temple Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 83 Issue 4, p979 

    The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) which dealt with campaign finance. Information is provided on how the decision gave corporations First Amendment protections and allowed corporations to make unlimited amounts of donations...

  • THE FIRST AMENDMENT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE. Ribstein, Larry E. // Georgia State University Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p1019 

    The article discusses the debate on corporate governance in the Supreme Court case Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission (FEC) under the First Amendment of the Constitution in the U.S. It explains Citizens United's support for corporate speech regulation in the context of corporate...

  • The Evolution of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission.  // Free Speech Yearbook;2011, Vol. 45, p131 

    The article discusses a court case between Citizens United and U.S. Federal Election Commission concerning the broadcast of documentary film "Hillary: The Movie." It mentions that the Supreme Court overturned the decision of Washington D.C. Court of Appeals, noting that Congress could not...

  • Citizens Dis-United: Justices May Take Another Look at Campaign Finance Case. Gordon, Leslie A. // ABA Journal;May2012, Vol. 98 Issue 5, p1 

    The article presents information on corporate campaign spending political action committee (PAC) with reference to the trial of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission as decided by the U.S. Supreme Court. A focus is on the issues related to indirect and independent corporate expenditures...

  • THE FIRST AMENDMENT… UNITED. Gora, Joel M. // Georgia State University Law Review;Summer2011, Vol. 27 Issue 4, p935 

    The article discusses the application of the U.S. First Amendment to the Constitution provision on the Supreme Court's protection to individual rights and the enforcement of government limits for civil liberties in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case. The court explains that...

  • CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--FIRST AMENDMENT-AGGREGATE LIMITS ON CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS VIOLATE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS. GODWIN, ERIN // Cumberland Law Review;2015, Vol. 45 Issue 3, p639 

    The article discusses U.S. Supreme Court cases including McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) and Citizens United v. FEC, focusing on the court's decision on how limits on campaign contributions violate First Amendment rights. Other topics include quid pro quo corruption, how the FEC...

  • MR. PRECEDENT. Mencimer, Stephanie // Mother Jones;May/Jun2011, Vol. 36 Issue 3, p54 

    The article presents a profile of lawyer James Bopp, whose practice focuses on campaign-finance law. Bopp has been involved in prominent court cases including Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. His litigation in favor of removing campaign contribution limits and keeping the names of...

  • SYMPOSIUM FOREWORD. Fein, Ronald A. // Constitutional Commentary;Summer2015, Vol. 30 Issue 2, p213 

    An introduction is presented in which editor discusses various articles within the issue on topics including the corporate speech under the U.S. First Amendment, role of money in politics and concept of corporate democracy in context of the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. FEC.

  • Fighting Campaign Finance Reform. Kosterlitz, Julie // National Journal;9/5/2009, p5 

    The article deals with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court to hold a rehearing of Citizens United versus Federal Election Commission on September 9, 2009, and its impact on the legal challenges against campaign finance laws filed by James Bopp. It outlines the arguments raised by Bopp against...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics