TITLE

FEC not to blame for election law

AUTHOR(S)
Petersen, Matthew
PUB. DATE
April 2011
SOURCE
Hill;4/13/2011, Vol. 18 Issue 51, p32
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The author reflects on the criticism directed at Republican members of the U.S. Federal Election Commission (FEC) which questions how their enforcement of the federal campaign finance law and their management of the agency.
ACCESSION #
60169473

 

Related Articles

  • TIMING IS EVERYTHING: A NEW MODEL FOR COUNTERING CORRUPTION WITHOUT SILENCING SPEECH IN ELECTIONS. Levinson, Jessica A. // St. Louis University Law Journal;Spring2011, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p853 

    The article focuses on the consequences of the judgment in the U.S. Supreme Court case Citizens United v. U.S. Federal Election Committee (FEC). Information is provided on how the decision struck down all prohibitions on corporations' use of general funds to make campaign donations but failed to...

  • Checks and limits. Olasky, Marvin // World (0888157X);10/1/2016, Vol. 31 Issue 20, p24 

    The article presents an interview with Lee Goodman, Republican member of the U.S. Federal Election Commission (FEC), who discusses the role of FEC, the aspects of the limitations on political campaign distributions, and the issue on the commission's effectiveness and dysfunction.

  • FEC Flags More Than 1,000 Possible Errors in Trump Campaign Filings. McIntire Peters, Katherine // Government Executive;11/21/2016, p1 

    The article reports that the U.S. Federal Election Commission (FEC) has sent Timothy Jost, treasurer of Donald J. Trump For President, Inc., a letter on November 20, 2016, requesting clarification for about 1,100 campaign contributions totalling 1.3 million U.S. dollars, expressing concern that...

  • Money Talks.  // Time;Feb1982, Vol. 119 Issue 5, p66 

    The article reports on the impact of the ruling on the reform scheme enacted by Congress in 1976 as a means to clean up presidential and congressional elections in the U.S. It states that the Federal Election Commission has cited a legal spending ceiling of 1,000 dollars for independent groups...

  • High-Court Hypocrisy. Alter, Jonathan // Newsweek (Atlantic Edition);2/1/2010 (Atlantic Edition), Vol. 155 Issue 5, p17 

    The article offers the author's views on a January 2010 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn election spending limits placed on corporations. The case involving the corporate-backed organization Citizens United and the U.S. Federal Election Commission is discussed. Supreme Court Chief...

  • High-Court Hypocrisy. Alter, Jonathan // Newsweek (Pacific Edition);2/1/2010 (Pacific Edition), Vol. 155 Issue 5, p19 

    The article offers the author's views on a January 2010 ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn election spending limits placed on corporations. The case involving the corporate-backed organization Citizens United and the U.S. Federal Election Commission is discussed. Supreme Court Chief...

  • FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION.  // United States Government Manual;2009/2010, p392 

    The article features the U.S. Federal Election Commission, which is exclusively responsible in the administration and civil implementation of laws that regulate the acquisition and expenses of campaign funds to make sure that the parties involved comply with the Federal election campaign...

  • As Political Groups Push Envelope, FEC Gridlock Gives 'De Facto Green Light'. Wang, Marian // Pro Publica;11/ 7/2011, p1 

    The article discusses the challenges faced by the U.S. Federal Election Commission (FEC) to enforce campaign-finance law in the wake of the 2012 U.S. Presidential elections. It says that FEC has yet to provide a single rule to address super political action committees (PACs), which serve as...

  • The Money Game: Changing the Rules.  // Time;2/9/1976, Vol. 107 Issue 6, p10 

    The article offers information on the U.S. Supreme Court's rulings on campaign finance of the 1976 presidential candidates based on the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1974. It says that the law's rule restricting the campaign contributions to 1000 dollars was left intact, though the court...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics