Wilderness Is Us

March 2001
Christian Science Monitor;3/21/2001, Vol. 93 Issue 80, p10
Editorial. Discusses the need to balance economics and environmental conditions in the United States, in light of the idea to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska.


Related Articles

  • Hotspots!  // New Internationalist;Jun2001, Issue 335, p22 

    Provides information on several oil exploration locations. Reaction to planned opening of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to explorations; Impact of the utilization of oil fields in southern Sudan; Cost of the drilling project in Chad and Cameroon.

  • Senate leaders open doors to ANWR drilling.  // National Petroleum News;May2005, Vol. 97 Issue 5, p9 

    Reports that U.S. Senate leaders are intensifying pressure to allow oil drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) as part of the Senate's 2005-2006 budget. "Reasonable chance" language that will be included in the 2005-2006 budget to begin ANWR oil exploration; Reaction of the...

  • Senate energy bill threatens environment.  // National Parks;Sep/Oct91, Vol. 65 Issue 9/10, p13 

    Examines the provisions of the National Energy Security Act, or S.1220, currently before the United States Senate. Opening of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil and gas drilling; Senate Energy Committee; Deregulation of the energy industry; Arctic and subarctic ecosystems still...

  • Scrooge lives: Lumps of coal from Congress. Brandon, Hembree // Southeast Farm Press;2/6/2006, Vol. 33 Issue 5, p5 

    The author criticizes the move of the U.S. Congress regarding the dismantling of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska in favor of the Texas Oil Patch North. He states the risk involved in the move like its effect on the student loan program specifically in higher education. He reflects...

  • Exploring ANWR. Barnes, Scottie // Geospatial Solutions;Apr2005, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p10 

    Comments on a U.S. Senate vote in favor of drilling for oil in Area 1002 of Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Concerns that the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries cannot meet rising demand; Experts' prediction that the price could soar to $60; Arguments supporting or opposing...

  • Oil Field or Sanctuary? Mitchell, John G. // National Geographic;Aug2001, Vol. 200 Issue 2, p46 

    Discusses the issue of whether or not drilling should be allowed in the United States Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Northern Alaska. Whether or not the coastal plain of the refuge contains enough oil to justify the economic cost and environmental risk; Petroleum consumption in the...

  • Energy. Acomb, Deborah L. // National Journal;5/1/2004, Vol. 36 Issue 18, p1358 

    Presents the views of U.S. citizens on the petroleum industry based on economic surveys as of May 2004. Percentage of respondents who are expecting a rise in gasoline prices; Response of U.S. citizens to the proposal to use the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge of Alaska for oil exploration;...

  • Energy. Acomb, Deborah L. // National Journal;2/26/2005, Vol. 37 Issue 9, p629 

    Presents the results of separate public opinion polls conducted by Zogby and by Bellwether and Lake, Snell, Perry regarding the opening of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) in Alaska for oil exploration. Percentage of registered voters in the U.S. who favored opening the refuge if it...

  • Searching for a National Energy Policy. Holdren, John P. // Issues in Science & Technology;Spring2001, Vol. 17 Issue 3, p43 

    Focuses on the energy-related challenges faced by the United States. Increase in oil imports; Opposition to the plan to drill for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge; Problem posed by overdependence on imported oil; Decline in U.S. domestic oil production.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics