TITLE

High court voids steel seizure

PUB. DATE
June 1952
SOURCE
America;6/14/1952, Vol. 87 Issue 11, p287
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The author reflects on the oral arguments in the steel seizure case, Youngstown Co. v. Sawyer, nullified by the Supreme Court in the U.S. The author explores an argument, contending that the power that the President claimed was authorized not by an act of Congress or by any provision in the Federal Constitution. Moreover, the author also emphasizes that the dissenting opinion of Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson, concurred in by other Justices likely appears to shape the future law of the nation.
ACCESSION #
35338129

 

Related Articles

  • A Historic Decision. Denton, Ilene // Sarasota Magazine;Mar2004, Vol. 26 Issue 6, p42 

    In the summer of 1953, 26-year-old Earl Pollock, fresh from graduating first in his class at Northwestern University Law School, came to Washington, D.C., to clerk for U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Fred Vinson. When Vinson died just two months later, his replacement, Earl Warren, asked...

  • The Chief Justice slips.  // America;8/25/1951, Vol. 85 Issue 21, p494 

    The article discusses the decision of the Supreme Court on a case which upholds the constitutionality of the Smith Act and sustain the conviction of the top men of the Communist party in the U.S. It cites the statement of Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson in his majority decision on the case Dennis...

  • THORNTON v. UNITED STATES: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on U.S. Supreme Court case Thornton v. United States, case number 03-5165 argued on March 31, 2004 and decided on May 24, 2004. Police officer Deion Nichols found narcotics and weapon in the vehicle of petitioner Marcus Thornton. Thorton was charged with...

  • THE SUPREME COURT IS STANDING PAT. Rodell, Fred // New Republic;12/19/49, Vol. 121 Issue 25, p11 

    Focuses on the decade of 1939-40 which was dubbed as the U.S. Supreme Court's Golden Age. Nomination of Fred Vinson as Chief Justice; Slowdown in the court's production; Need for refusal of hearing for any case by the U.S. Supreme Court.

  • Making History. Ewers, Justin // U.S. News & World Report;3/22/2004, Vol. 136 Issue 10, p76 

    Discusses the history of the 1954 U.S. Supreme Court decision, "Brown v. Board of Education in Topeka." Presentation of the basic facts of the case; Claim that the outcome of the case was by no means certain; Description of the different conditions in black and white schools; Claim that the...

  • Supreme Court Changes Vehicle Search Rules. Hodsdon, Richard // Sheriff;Sep/Oct2009, Vol. 61 Issue 5/6, p68 

    The article discusses a court case where a decision from the U.S. Supreme Court to change the operation of law enforcement during search incidents in the arrest of persons in motor vehicles in the U.S. It notes that the policies, procedures, and practices of law enforcement must change. It...

  • GEORGIA v. RANDOLPH: CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court case Georgia v. Randolph, case number 04-1067, argued on November 8, 2005 and decided on March 22, 2006. The validity of consent given by one occupant in his residence for search or entry of the police is reviewed by the Supreme Court....

  • GEORGIA, PETITIONER v. SCOTT FITZ RANDOLPH: ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA.  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court case Georgia v. Randolph, case number 04-1067, argued on November 8, 2005 and decided on March 22, 2006. The dispute between petitioner Scott Randolph and his wife Janet Randolph is presented in the case in the context of the Fourth...

  • DUSENBERY v. UNITED STATES: certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the sixth circuit .  // Supreme Court Cases: The Twenty-first Century (2000 - Present);2009, p1 

    This article presents information on the U.S. Supreme Court case Dusenbery v. U.S., case number 00-6567, argued on October 29, 2001 and decided on January 8, 2002. In vacating and remanding, the Sixth Circuit held that the motion of the petitioner for the return of all the property and funds...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics