TITLE

Pay referendum can drive value for shareholders

AUTHOR(S)
Lane, Marc J.
PUB. DATE
May 2007
SOURCE
Crain's Chicago Business;5/7/2007, Vol. 30 Issue 19, p18
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The author comments on the issue regarding the compensation packages offered by public companies to their executives in the U.S. According to the author, corporate shareholders should have the legal right to weigh in on the compensation packages that are awarded to their top executives. However, critics fear that giving shareholders a voice in compensation decisions might empower activist investors to unfairly promote their social or political agendas.
ACCESSION #
25076704

 

Related Articles

  • Start rolling back the CEO options express. Ferlauto, Richard // Pensions & Investments;2/5/2001, Vol. 29 Issue 3, p12 

    Reports the complaint of institutional investors against executive pay packages. Effect of giving excessive equity allocations; List of shareholder agenda for shareholder resolution; Implication of increasing proportion of companies; Impact of increasing severance of pay-off packages for failed...

  • Armed and dangerous.  // Director;Jul/Aug2011, Vol. 64 Issue 11, p35 

    The article discusses how companies can maintain a healthy business and keep investors happy despite shareholders' monitoring of performance and executive pay. It cites several cases of shareholders' revolt, including at bookmaker William Hill and communications group WPP. Tom Powdrill of...

  • HOW MUCH FOR THE HOT SEAT? Olins, Rufus; Gwyther, Matthew // Management Today;Aug2001, p10 

    Editorial. Comments on the high paying salaries of senior executives in Great Britain. Index of companies in Europe provided by Wall Street Journal; Pressure from investors on executives; Effects of long working hours to married couples.

  • Buying and Selling Stand-Alone Brands.  // USA Today Magazine;Apr2012, Vol. 140 Issue 2803, p5 

    The article presents the findings that investors reward companies that acquire stand-alone brands instead of entire firms, and net shareholder worth is also created for the firm with weaker marketing capabilities that transferred a brand to a firm with stronger marketing capabilities.

  • Say On Pay: Results From Overseas. Deane, Stephen // Corporate Board;Jul/Aug2007, Vol. 28 Issue 165, p11 

    The idea of giving shareholders a say in approving top executive pay has been a powerful one this proxy season. Though such ‘say on pay’ powers are new to the U.S., they are already well established in a number of other countries. How well such mandates have succeeded (and where...

  • Share Repurchases, Equity Issuances, and the Optimal Design of Executive Pay. Fried, Jesse M. // Texas Law Review;Apr2011, Vol. 89 Issue 5, p1113 

    This Article identifies a potential cost to public investors of tying executive pay to the stock's future value--even its long-term value. In particular, such an arrangement can incentivize executives to engage in share repurchases (when the current stock price is low) and equity issuances (when...

  • Five Reasons to Support Shareholder Primacy. Elson, Charles M. // NACD Directorship;Apr/May2010, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p63 

    The article discusses the reasons why shareholder primacy should be supported. The author highlights the implications of failure to prioritize the interests of shareholders' interests which he believes will drive away investors and capital. He asserts the role of shareholder primacy as the key...

  • Pay must be made clearer to investors. Jordon, Dearbail // Finance Week (Centaur Communications);11/16/2005, p12 

    The article presents the author's view on the challenges associated with the directors' remuneration policies in Great Britain. She claims that the move by companies to set out all elements of executive pay under the Director Remuneration Report Regulations introduced in 2002 is problematical...

  • SHARE DEVILS. Stensholt, John // BRW;3/26/2009, Vol. 31 Issue 12, p44 

    The article focuses on the financial condition of several companies and financial executives. It notes that Lev Mizikovski, the managing director of Tamawood, and the 77% shareholder has requested the board to cancel his $150,000 salary. It also mentions that Daryl Holmes, the managing director...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics