TITLE

Senate 9/11 Bill Ignores Needed Security Measures

AUTHOR(S)
Kyl, Jon
PUB. DATE
March 2007
SOURCE
Human Events;3/19/2007, Vol. 63 Issue 10, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Editorial
ABSTRACT
The author reflects on issues related to the bill, the Improving America's Security Act, which professes to strengthen national security and help protect the U.S. from terrorist threats. According to the author, a national security package offered by Republicans had provisions to discourage terrorism by increasing the penalties for terrorism-related activities. He states that the Improving America's Security Act represents a missed opportunity to improve our the nation's security.
ACCESSION #
24478459

 

Related Articles

  • Republicans called 'Emperors of Earmarks'.  // Hill;6/15/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 72, p16 

    The author shares his insights regarding political issues surrounding the passage of the Homeland Security bill in the U.S. According to the author, this legislative bill would contribute to the provision of national security if signed into law. The author says that those who blocked the...

  • May We Get Serious Now? O'Sullivan, John // National Review;4/22/2002, Vol. 54 Issue 7, p23 

    This article examines the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Bill that was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives. Legislation to tighten up border security was certainly required after the terrorist attacks in the U.S. that took place last year. The bill consists of...

  • Combating Terrorism: Observations on Options to Improve the Federal Response: GAO-01-660T.  // GAO Reports;4/24/2001, p1 

    This testimony discusses three bills that would change the overall leadership and management of programs to combat terrorism. The three bills--H.R. 525, H.R. 1158, and H.R. 1292--vary in scope. H.R. 525 focuses on federal programs to prepare state and local governments for domestic terrorist...

  • Patriot II: The Sequel--Why It's Even Scarier than the First Patriot Act. Ramasastry, Anita // Knowledge, Technology & Policy;Fall2003, Vol. 16 Issue 3, p7 

    This article reports that soon after the terrorist acts of September 11, 2001, the U.S. Congress passed the USA PATRIOT Act, which conferred broad new powers upon the federal government. Now Attorney General John Ashcroft and his scribes at the Justice Department have been secretly working to...

  • MISGUIDED LIBERTARIANS ARE HINDERING THE WAR ON TERRORISM. Taylor Jr., Stuart // National Journal;8/2/2003, Vol. 35 Issue 31, p2466 

    Deals with the opposition of civil libertarians to the U.S. Patriot Act which could hinder the war on terrorism as of August 2003. Number of states that oppose the law according to the American Civil Liberties Union; Misconceptions about the law; Arguments against the law; Justification for the...

  • Two Years Later. Clark, Timothy B. // Government Executive;Sep2003, Vol. 35 Issue 14, p6 

    Two years after 19 terrorists turned four commercial jetliners into missiles, leveling the World Trade Center and severely damaging the Pentagon, federal agencies are still trying to figure out how best to secure the U.S. from future attacks. Reducing vulnerabilities in a democratic society,...

  • Security Advisories.  // World Almanac & Book of Facts;2004, p167 

    Discusses how the various security advisories established by the Homeland Security Advisory System are used to indicate the estimated threat level for a terrorist attack in the United States. Consideration of the security measures that should be taken to comply with low, guarded, elevated, and...

  • At last, 9/11 bill heads to conference. Kaplan, Jonathan E. // Hill;7/18/2007, Vol. 14 Issue 87, p8 

    The article reports that the homeland security bill or 9/11 bill was finally moving forward despite the jurisdictional fights and partisan conflict at the U.S. Congress. According to Homeland Security Chairman Bennie Thompson, the Democrats should continue to look for ways to revive a part of...

  • NATIONAL SECURITY FEDERALISM IN THE AGE OF TERROR. Waxman, Matthew C. // Stanford Law Review;Feb2012, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p289 

    National security law scholarship tends to focus on the balancing of security and liberty, and the overwhelming bulk of that scholarship is about such balancing on the horizontal axis among branches at the federal level. This Article challenges that standard focus by supplementing it with an...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics