December 2014
Boston University Law Review;Dec2014, Vol. 94 Issue 6, p1781
Academic Journal
A number of law review articles have noted the issues inherent in treating class members' failure to opt out as consent to the court's personal jurisdiction or as agreement to a proposed class settlement. Missing from the existing analyses, however, is the "big picture"--the reality that class action silence is layered, resulting in silence that is repeatedly and inappropriately compounded. At each and every step in class action litigation, absent class members are not just expected, but effectively encouraged, to remain silent. Moreover, at every step, courts interpret class members' silence as consent. The ultimate result is a "piling on" of consents: the expected and encouraged silence is deemed to constitute consent to the filing of the class suit and consent to personal jurisdiction and consent to be bound to any resulting class judgment and consent to the proposed class settlement and approval of the proposed settlement's terms and conditions. Yet this compounded effect occurs under highly ambiguous circumstances, where arguably the most sensible interpretation of class members' silence is not consent, but confusion. The multiple and contradictory meanings of silence render it unreasonable to equate the failure to opt out with consent. The fallacy of repeatedly ascribing consent to highly ambiguous silence should be recognized as a due process danger that potentially can deprive class members of property rights and their day in court.


Related Articles

  • AN OPT-IN OPTION FOR CLASS ACTIONS. Dodson, Scott // Michigan Law Review;Nov2016, Vol. 115 Issue 2, p171 

    Federal class actions today follow an opt-out model: absent an affirmative request to opt out, a class member is in the class. Supporters defend the opt-out model as necessary to ensure the viability of class actions and the efficacy of substantive law. Critics argue the opt-out model is a poor...

  • IS THE CLASS ACTION REALLY DEAD? IS THAT GOOD OR BAD FOR CLASS MEMBERS? Vairo, Georgene // Emory Law Journal;2014, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p477 

    Recent Supreme Court decisions have tightened up the standards for obtaining class certification and virtually eliminate class arbitration as well. However, while the Court has made it more difficult for plaintiffs ' attorneys to use class resolution of claims as a prosecutorial tool, the lower...

  • Low security. Silverstein, Ed // Inside Counsel (SyndiGate Media Inc.);6/1/2015, p1 

    The article focuses on a report regarding the declining number of securities class action filings in the U.S. Joseph A. Grundfest, a law professor, offers his view about the decreasing number of filings as well as settlements and the dollar risk of the exposure in unresolved litigation. Other...

  • High Court's Walmart ruling good news for employers.  // HR Specialist: Florida Employment Law;Sep2011, Vol. 6 Issue 9, p1 

    The article reports on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court that the lawsuit on behalf of 1.5 million female employees of Wal-Mart Stores Inc. cannot proceed as a single class-action case which makes it harder for employees to band together in a class-action cases against employers in the U.S.

  • ALL ALONE IN ARBITRATION: AT&T MOBILITY V. CONCEPCION AND THE SUBSTANTIVE IMPACT OF CLASS ACTION WAIVERS. Blechschmidt, Frank // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Jan2012, Vol. 160 Issue 2, p541 

    The article discusses the U.S. Supreme Court case AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion which deals with the enforceability of arbitration agreements and the substantive impact of class action waivers. The author argues for statutory reform measures at the judicial level in class action cases under...

  • Avoiding the "Plague" of Class Action/Representative Action Wage and Hour Suits. Drummonds, Henry H. // Labor Law Journal;Summer2014, Vol. 65 Issue 2, p76 

    The article presents practical advice for American employers on how to avoid an apparent flood of class action/representative action wage and hour lawsuits as of June 2014, focusing on suggestions for drafting mandatory arbitration policies with class/representative action waiver provisions. The...

  • Class Action Rule Reform. Barkett, John M. // Natural Resources & Environment;Fall2016, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p54 

    The article informs that the U.S. Federal Civil Rules Advisory Committee has recommended for publication and receipt of public comment five changes to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It reports that the proposed amendments incorporate "proposed settlement classes" into the rule,...

  • ENDING CLASS ACTIONS AS WE KNOW THEM: RETHINKING THE AMERICAN CLASS ACTION. Mullenix, Linda S. // Emory Law Journal;2014, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p399 

    Class actions have been a feature of the American litigation landscape for over seventy-five years. For most of this period, American-style class litigation was either unknown or resisted around the world. Notwithstanding this chilly reception abroad, American class litigation has always been a...

  • Federal Court Reins In Marketing Of Swipe-Fee Settlement Firms. RIANDA, PAUL A. // ISO & Agent;Apr2014, p88 

    The article reports on the emergence of third-party claims filing companies following the pending settlement of the class action interchange swipe-fee case involving credit card companies Visa and MasterCard in the U.S. Topics discussed include the court's ruling that modifies the marketing...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics