TITLE

When discourses collide: creationism and evolution in the public sphere

AUTHOR(S)
Dávila, Denise
PUB. DATE
December 2014
SOURCE
Cultural Studies of Science Education;Dec2014, Vol. 9 Issue 4, p877
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This review essay focuses on Özgür Taşkın's discussion of the theory of evolution (TOE), intelligent design (ID) and the convictions of fundamentalist science educators and students in his paper entitled: An exploratory examination of Islamic values in science education: Islamization of science teaching and learning via constructivism. It examines the competing social discourses of evolution and creationism in the United States, which is partially maintained by national public opinion polls and states' legislation about the TOE in the science curricula. The examination of US social discourses presented here is framed by James Gee's () theory that Discourses with a capital 'D,' are unconscious and uncritical socially accepted ways of speaking/listening and writing/reading that are merged with 'distinctive ways of acting, interacting, valuing, feeling, dressing, thinking, [and] believing...so as to enact specific socially recognizable identities...' (p. 155). Such Discourses identify insiders of and outsiders to religious affiliations and other social or cultural groups. The context of this examination is unique in that is draws from the national conversation about the inclusion of ID alongside of the TOE in the public school science programs. Gee's () concept that Discourses serve as tools of inquiry guides the analysis of video recorded public messages from Bill Nye and Lawrence Krauss as well as Creation Museum president Ken Ham. The analysis and discussion of the national conversation about creationism and public education suggests that the education community must consider the global landscape of science literacy both locally and internationally. It also indicates that preservice and practicing science educators may require special training and support. In order to provide unbiased, religious-resistant, evidence-based science instruction, science educators must understand how to separate church from state regardless of their personal beliefs. They must also know how to navigate conversations about the TOE among diverse communities of learners that include both religiously and non-religiously affiliated students.
ACCESSION #
99852607

 

Related Articles

  • REVOLUTION IN EVOLUTION? Vitaska, Sara // State Legislatures;May2005, Vol. 31 Issue 5, p24 

    Focuses on the disagreement on whether to teach evolution or creationism in public schools in the U.S. Court ruling of District Court Judge Clarence Cooper on a lawsuit filed by parents and the American Civil Liberties Union against the Cobb County School District in Georgia for its promotion...

  • FYI: Threats Remain for Evolution Education. Gropp, Robert E. // BioScience;Jan2008, Vol. 58 Issue 1, p16 

    The article considers the challenges of teaching the concept of evolution in the U.S. Intelligent design and creationism (IDC) proponents suffered a legal defeat when a federal judge ruled that intelligent design is no different from religious belief in creationism and has no place in the...

  • YES! ABSOLUTELY! LET'S TEACH CREATIONISM IN SCIENCE CLASSES! SIMÓN, ARMANDO // American Biology Teacher (University of California Press);Feb2013, Vol. 75 Issue 2, p83 

    An essay is presented in which the author argues in favor of teaching Creationism in science education. He suggests that this can be done in the framework of science rather than religion by applying scientific principles to the claims of Creationist explanations. In addition, he discusses the...

  • Alternative Viewpoints about Biological Origins as Taught in Public Schools. Luskin, Casey // Journal of Church & State;Summer2005, Vol. 47 Issue 3, p583 

    Reviews several laws to assess the ability to present creation science, intelligent design theory or scientific criticisms of evolution in public school districts in the U.S. which have various teaching viewpoints. Restrictions faced by the teaching of creation science; Background on the Lemon...

  • Intelligent design on trial. Witham, Larry // Christian Century;11/29/2005, Vol. 122 Issue 24, p8 

    The article provides information on a Pennsylvania trial on the teaching of evolution in public schools. The trial turned out to be an extended argument over the meaning of theology, science, politics, education and creation. Having heard the testimony of nine experts and 25 other witnesses, a...

  • On the Origin of Parties. Carmichael, Mary // Newsweek;2/12/2007, Vol. 149 Issue 7, p16 

    The author presents Darwin Day, a holiday created by Bob Stephens, a retired scientist, who is organizing a global celebration of the science of evolution. Even organizations in U.S. states that challenge evolution in favor of creationism will host events designed to educate the public and spark...

  • Point: Canadian Classrooms Should Focus on Science and not Religion. Parent, Gabrielle; Renneboog, Richard // Canadian Points of View: Teaching Evolution;2016, p2 

    The article presents an argument for teaching evolution. The author argues that the theory of evolution is central to modern biology and should be taught to all students. Incidents of requiring creationism or intelligent design to be taught in place of evolution are discussed. Particular focus...

  • Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.  // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;May-Jun2006, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p23 

    The article reports on the contradiction of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) of teaching intelligent design (ID) and creationism in U.S. schools. FASEB believes that science education has been an important force in driving innovation and discovery. With this,...

  • Other Schools of Thought. Adams, William Lee // Newsweek;11/28/2005, Vol. 146 Issue 22, p57 

    The article focuses on the debate over the teaching of evolution in public schools in the United States. In 1925, high school teacher John Scopes was found guilty of teaching evolution. In 1987, the Supreme Court ruled that the Creationism Act in Louisiana, which promoted the teaching of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics