The US Nuclear Monopoly and Europe

Lippmann, Walter
December 1962
New Republic;12/22/62, Vol. 147 Issue 25, p7
Focuses on the nuclear monopoly of the U.S. with reference to the confrontation regarding strategic weapons in Cuba. Deployment of the military nuclear power by the U.S.; Changes in the balance of nuclear power; Demonstration by the Cuban confrontation that the command of nuclear power is indivisible; Need of the realization of the adequacy of the U.S. nuclear power by the European nations.


Related Articles

  • Nuclear power and nuclear weapons: the connection is dangerous. Holdren, John P. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan1983, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p40 

    The article focuses on the relationship between nuclear power and the spread of nuclear weapons capability. Along with characterization of the benefits of nuclear power, one should also mention the liabilities associated with this energy source. Some analysts argue that the motivation for the...

  • Missing the Target on Nonproliferation? Sorkin, Jerry // Middle East Quarterly;Winter2005, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p1 

    Looks at the progress of the proactive counter-proliferation strategy launched by U.S. President George W. Bush in September 2002, which aimed to counter the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction in the world. Move by the Libyan government to abandon its nuclear program; Spread of...

  • The Lesser of Several Evils. Rushton, Paul // Peace & Conflict Monitor;Mar2006, p5 

    The article discusses issues surrounding the plans of Iran to build nuclear weapons. Under the Non-Proliferation Treaty, Iran is explicitly permitted to pursue peaceful nuclear energy, and the government claims that its nuclear program is purely for civilian power. The international community,...

  • Assessing Nuclear Maturity: Determining Which States Should Have Access to What Nuclear Technology. Bajema, Natasha; Nikitin, Mary Beth // Fletcher Forum of World Affairs;Summer2004, Vol. 28 Issue 2, p157 

    The article offers information on nuclear technology and verification programs conducted in several nations including Iraq, Iran and Libya. All countries are equal and have the right to use technology but peacefully. It also informs about the threats of possessing nuclear energy, which are...

  • Weapons Watch. Fitzpatrick, Mark // World Today;Feb2006, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p10 

    The article focuses on issues related to the proliferation of nuclear weapons in Iran and North Korea. Enrichment of weapons would allow Iran to learn the difficult technology of balancing things. Moreover, agreeing to enrichment would make it much more difficult for the International Atomic...

  • Facing the nuclear danger.  // Nature;11/20/2003, Vol. 426 Issue 6964, p213 

    Reports on issues concerning the safe management of nuclear materials in Russia. Threat of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction; Difficulty for the U.S. to sustain its commitment to Nunn-Lugar programs; Progress toward the Global Partnership Against the Spread of Weapons and Materials...

  • The U.S.-India safeguards dispute. Sweet, William // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jun1978, Vol. 34 Issue 6, p50 

    The article reports on the dispute between the United States and India regarding nuclear protection. The dispute between the two countries has not received much attention from the American media eventhough it is considered as one of the most important test of the antiproliferation policies of...

  • A POWERFUL PEACE. Schell, Jonathan // YES! Magazine;Summer2008, Issue 46, p35 

    The article discusses the possession of nuclear arms that provokes proliferation. Reductions of nuclear powers by Great Britain and the United States might pay for establishment and practice of inspections. It is said that when nuclear weapon holdings reached zero, nuclear weapons states and...

  • Why not stop testing? Hopkins, John C. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Apr1977, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p30 

    The author presents the reasons why nuclear weapons testing should continue. According to the author, who happens to be a nuclear weapon designer, if they stop weapon testing then they would not get the new weapons systems which is their primary responsibility. He also asserted that if weapon...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics