TITLE

What you don't know won't hurt you: a laboratory analysis of betrayal aversion

AUTHOR(S)
Aimone, Jason; Houser, Daniel
PUB. DATE
December 2012
SOURCE
Experimental Economics;Dec2012, Vol. 15 Issue 4, p571
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Recent research argues 'betrayal aversion' leads many people to avoid risk more when a person, rather than nature, determines the outcome of uncertainty. However, past studies indicate that factors unrelated to betrayal aversion, such as loss aversion, could contribute to differences between treatments. Using a novel experiment design to isolate betrayal aversion, one that varies how strategic uncertainty is resolved, we provide rigorous evidence supporting the detrimental impact of betrayal aversion. The impact is substantial: holding fixed the probability of betrayal, the possibility of knowing that one has been betrayed reduces investment by about one-third. We suggest emotion-regulation underlies these results and helps to explain the importance of impersonal, institution-mediated exchange in promoting economic efficiency.
ACCESSION #
99376485

 

Related Articles

  • Comparision of a Case Study of Uncertainty Propagation using Possibility - Probability Transformation. Ali, Tazid; Dutta, Palash; Boruah, Hrishikesh // International Journal of Computer Applications;Dec2011, Vol. 35, p47 

    Uncertainty parameters in risk assessment can be modeled by different ways viz. probability distribution, possibility distribution, belief measure, depending upon the nature and availability of the data. Different transformations exist for converting expression of one form of uncertainty to...

  • RISK AND UNCERTAINTIES IN CALCULATION AND ASSESSMENT OF ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY OF INVESTMENT. Halmi, Mirela // Quality - Access to Success;2012 Supplement 3, Vol. 13, p293 

    Uncertainty may influence the investments through different channels and into different directions. The sense of this influence is still unknown. In economic literature there is a distinction between risk supposing calculations grounded on a past experience or sufficient data in order to...

  • Dall'analisi dell'incertezza alla valutazione del rischio di investimento. Monacciani, Fabiana // Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione;2010, Vol. 14 Issue 46, p69 

    Correct assessment of critical variables influencing public investment final outcome is often a crucial procedure, especially in cases where the dynamics of such variables cannot be controlled by public agents, because they mainly depend on choices and behaviors of other operators. This is a...

  • Real Options and Strategic Investment Decisions: Can They Be of Use to Scholars? Krychowski, Charlotte; QuĂ©lin, Bertrand V. // Academy of Management Perspectives;May2010, Vol. 24 Issue 2, p65 

    Real options (RO) analysis has been of growing interest to the academic community as a promising approach to supporting investment decisions under uncertainty. In this article we examine an applied investment decision in the telecommunications industry to highlight the main benefits associated...

  • UNCERTAINTY OF PROBABILITY COMPONENT OF ACCIDENTAL RISK. Kolesnikov, Eugeny Y. // Reliability: Theory & Applications;Mar2014, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p81 

    Concept of accidental risk is intended to be an objective measure for assessing the risk of accidents in the technosphere. Metric of risk should combine estimation both probability (possibility) of the accident and the damage it caused. For various reasons, any parameter of risk has uncertainty....

  • A Cognitive Framework for Normative Reasoning under Uncertainty, and Reasoning about Risk, and Implications for Educational Practice. Kuzmak, Sylvia // Mathematics Enthusiast;Jun2015, Vol. 12 Issue 1-3, p140 

    Clarifying what is normative or appropriate reasoning under various circumstances provides a valuable reference for guiding what should be taught, and, in contrast, what should not be. This paper proposes a cognitive framework for viewing normative reasoning and behavior under uncertainty,...

  • Risky business. Davies, Paul // TCE: The Chemical Engineer;Feb2009, Issue 812, p28 

    The author ponders on the definition of risk. He explains why he considers risk the product of consequence and likelihood. He believes that risk cannot be separated from perceptions. He claims the common use of risk is linked to chance and negative outcomes. He considers the societal aspect of risk.

  • Evaluating Risk. Gross, Peter; Schuerger, Robert // EC&M Electrical Construction & Maintenance;Sep2006, Vol. 105 Issue 9, p44 

    The article provides information about probabilistic risk assessment (PRA). PRA is one of the methods of evaluating risks associated to technical complex systems. Risk in PRA is defined as a detrimental outcome that is feasible. The first step of PRA is to determine what the risks are for a...

  • FUZZY RISK VERSUS PROBABILISTIC RISK IN PROJECT ECONOMICS. Iloiu, Mirela; Iloiu, Sorin; Csiminga, Diana; Mangu, Sorin // Annals of DAAAM & Proceedings;Jan2011, p1289 

    In this paper we presented the probabilistic risk analysis of the investment projects and we offered a better, more precise alternative - fuzzy risk analysis. This approach, although is analogous to probability theory, can be carried out under weaker assumption and used when limited...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics