FCC considers banning use of term 'Redskins'

Hattem, Julian
October 2014
Hill;10/1/2014, Vol. 21 Issue 104, p5
The article reports on the consideration of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) whether to ban television (TV) and radio stations from repeatedly using the term "R##skins" following a complaint against Washington sports radio station WWXX-FM from using the said term.


Related Articles

  • Fox Challenges Indecency Fine. Halonen, Doug // Television Week;12/6/2004, Vol. 23 Issue 49, p3 

    The article reports that Fox Broadcasting Co. and the majority of the network's affiliates challenged a $1.183 million U.S. Federal Communications Commission indecency fine. The network said that the agency's action violates the First Amendment. The agency imposed a $7,000 fine on each of the...

  • Who's Afraid of the FCC?  // Back Stage East;4/6/2006, Vol. 47 Issue 14, p4 

    The article presents information on the U.S. Federal Communications Commission's TV censorship agenda. With the government's role in policing what should be presented on TV continuing to increase, it was only a matter of time before the self-censorship began. The Warner Bros. Inc., has became...

  • FCC Hacks Away at V-Chip. Eggerton, John // Broadcasting & Cable;12/12/2006, Vol. 136 Issue 49, p16 

    This article discusses the ineffectiveness of the V-chip at protecting children from indecency on television. The United States Federal Communications Commission (FCC) lawyers say that the commission itself needs to play a role in helping parents. Major networks Fox, CBS, ABC, and NBC challenge...

  • H--I to the Chief. Eggerton, John // Broadcasting & Cable;7/24/2006, Vol. 136 Issue 29, p10 

    The article reports on the arguments raised by television networks regarding their decision to bleep U.S. President George Bush's profanity. The move of ABC, NBC and CBS to bleep the expletive statement of the president raised questions on whether they did it because of possible sanctions from...

  • A Day at the Hearing.  // New Republic;3/5/62, Vol. 146 Issue 10, p13 

    Highlights the conversation during a hearing of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on network program policies. Information on the area of FCC censorship over television programming; Comment on the television program "Thriller"; Report that "Thriller" is a public service program in...

  • LETTER FROM THE EDITOR JUNE 2004. Sischy, Ingrid // Interview;Jun2004, Vol. 34 Issue 5, p60 

    Comments on an interview with radio show host Al Franken regarding the censorship on radio and television programs in the U.S. Allegations of Franken against U.S. President George W. Bush; Plan of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission to participate in the daily programming of radio and...

  • Supreme Court leaves indecency safe harbor intact. Stern, Christopher // Broadcasting & Cable;1/15/96, Vol. 126 Issue 3, p10 

    Reports that the US Supreme Court has upheld the ban of the US Federal Communications Commission on indecent programming from 6 a.m. to 10 p.m. Act considered to be justified in protecting children from potentially harmful programming.

  • FCC Makes It Easier To Complain. Eggerton, John // Broadcasting & Cable;10/10/2005, Vol. 135 Issue 41, p28 

    Focuses on the launching of a Web site, which will allow viewers to complain about indecent broadcasts, at the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) by anti-decency activist Penny Nance. Reason behind the decision of FCC to launch the Web site.

  • Conservatives urge Congress to block softening of TV indecency rules. Sasso, Brendan // Hill;5/9/2013, Vol. 20 Issue 54, p10 

    The article reports on the move of dozens of conservative family values groups to urge lawmakers to prevent the softening of television indecency rules of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the U.S.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics