Bartholomew, Christine P.
August 2014
Cardozo Law Review;Aug2014, Vol. 35 Issue 6, p2147
Academic Journal
In 2011, with five words of dicta, the Supreme Court opened Pandora's Box for private antitrust enforcements By suggesting trial courts must evaluate the admissibility of expert testimony at class certification, the Court placed a significant obstacle in the path of antitrust class actions. Following the Supreme Court's lead, most courts now permit parties to bring expert challenges far earlier than the traditional summary judgment or pre-trial timing. Premature rejection of expert testimony dooms budding private antitrust suits--cases that play an essential role in modern antitrust enforcement. The dangers for private antitrust plaintiffs are compounded by the Court's opaque pronouncements on how to assess expert testimony. Confusion over how to evaluate antitrust economic experts, both substantively and procedurally, allows courts to use their gatekeeping power to undermine private antitrust enforcement. Despite a large body of scholarship on Daubert (the test for expert admissibility), little has been written on its unique intersection with antitrust class actions. This Article fills that void by exploring how Daubert analysis at class certification hamstrings antitrust enforcement. The Article begins by discussing how judicial evaluation of expert testimony has evolved, with a particular eye to how courts address antitrust economic expert testimony at class certification. It then explains why this new barrier potentially places an impassible, unjustified roadblock in private antitrust enforcement's path.


Related Articles

  • The Admissibility of TrueAllele: A Computerized DNA Interpretation System. Moss, Katherine L. // Washington & Lee Law Review;Spring2015, Vol. 72 Issue 2, p1033 

    The article discusses the potential admissibility of scientific evidence (SE) featuring TruAllele computerized DNA interpretation technology in American courts as of 2015, and it mentions the evidentiary standards that were developed in the U.S. Supreme Court cases Frye v. United States and...

  • A TALE OF TWO DAUBERTS. Seaman, Julie A. // Georgia Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 47 Issue 3, p889 

    Under the Federal Rules of Evidence and Supreme Court precedent, a single standard ostensibly governs the admissibility of scientific and other expert evidence in criminal and civil cases. Although Georgia has recently become the forty-fourth state to adopt the Federal Rules of Evidence, it has...

  • IN DEFENSE OF SUFFICIENCY: A REPLY TO PROFESSOR TWERSKI AND MR. SAPIR. Green, Michael D.; Sanders, Joseph // Widener Law Journal;2014, Vol. 23 Issue 3, p663 

    In this article, the authors respond to the comments of law professors Aaron D. Twerski and Lior Sapir on the relationship between the sufficiency of scientific evidence and the admissibility of expert witness testimony, made in an article within this issue. It discusses the judicial decision of...

  • What Has a Decade of Daubert Wrought? Berger, Margaret A. // American Journal of Public Health;2005 Supplement 1, Vol. 95, p59 

    There have been changes within the judicial system that may be attributable to opinions on the admissibility of expert testimony that began with the Supreme Court's 1993 decision in Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. After surveying Daubert and subsequent related Supreme Court opinions,...

  • The "Pure Opinion" Exception to the Florida Frye Standard. Mahle, Stephen E. // Florida Bar Journal;Feb2012, Vol. 86 Issue 2, p41 

    The article focuses on the pure opinion exception (POE) to the Florida Frye standard, the name given to the reliability test of expert testimony named after the U.S. Supreme Court case Frye v. United States. Topics include Florida court rules regarding admissible testimony as well as the U.S....

  • A SHORT PRIMER ON THE ADMISSIBILITY OF FORENSIC SCIENCE EVIDENCE IN TENNESSEE: A CHECKLIST. Raum, Bernard A. // Tennessee Journal of Law & Policy;Fall2010, Vol. 6 Issue 2, p161 

    The article discusses issues related to the use of forensic evidence admissibility checklist as an evidentiary checklist for attorneys in Tennessee. It is informed that witness checklists are employed by most trial attorneys during in-court examination to ensure that all of the witnesses'...

  • Expertise, Lab Lit, And The Fantasy Of Science Free From Economics. Caudill, David S. // Cardozo Law Review;Aug2012, Vol. 33 Issue 6, p2471 

    The article presents information on the subject of science free from economics in the U.S. with respect to the admissibility of expertise and fantasies. The decision of the Supreme Court of the U.S. regarding the court case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. deals with evidence law on...

  • Putting Proponents to Their Proof: Evidentiary Rules at Class Certification. Mullenix, Linda S. // George Washington Law Review;May2014, Vol. 82 Issue 3, p606 

    One of the most often cited precepts at class certification hearings--when courts hold such hearings--is that the rules of evidence do not apply. Since 1966, virtually every federal and state judge has fallen back on this trope to wave off objections to materials offered by counsel during class...

  • Completing the admissibility equation. Reuben, Richard C. // ABA Journal;Sep97, Vol. 83 Issue 9, p44 

    Focuses on the United States Supreme Court case `Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Incorporated.' Issue on the use of scientific evidence that the case touched; Information on the use of scientific testimony in the case; Information on the decision of the United States Circuit Courts of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics