TITLE

THE ABSENTEE POST-CONVICTION CONSTITUTIONAL SAFEGUARDS

AUTHOR(S)
Hansen, Danielle M.
PUB. DATE
June 2012
SOURCE
Touro Law Review;2012, Vol. 28 Issue 3, p563
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article offers information on the judicial decision of City Court Of Middletown, New York, in the case of People v. Zowaski, taken on January 24, 2011. It informs that the Court addressed the need for changes in traditional policies of punishment and judicial sentencing. It discusses observations of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case United States v. Watts regarding the judge's reliance on acquittal conduct to enhance a sentence under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
ACCESSION #
97583797

 

Related Articles

  • A LOOK AT THE USE OF ACQUITTED CONDUCT IN SENTENCING. Beutler, Erica K. // Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology;Spring98, Vol. 88 Issue 3, p809 

    This article presents information on the judgment given in the Supreme Court case--United States v. Watts. In United States a Watts, the United States Supreme Court addressed whether sentencing courts, when determining a convicted defendant's sentence, may consider conduct relating to charges of...

  • THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS RIGHT OF COMPANIONSHIP BETWEEN A PARENT AND HIS OR HER ADULT CHILD: EXAMINATION OF A CIRCUIT SPLIT. Weinberg, Meir // New England Law Review;Winter2009, Vol. 43 Issue 2, p271 

    The article discusses a circuit court contention over the due process right of companionship between a parent and his or her adult child in the U.S. Fourteenth Amendment. A brief overview of the history of substantive due process rights in the country is presented. It recommends finding a...

  • REDISTRICTING IN THE STATES: How Will Changes in the Voting Rights Act Affect Line Drawers This Decade? Davis, Michelle L. // Public Lawyer;Jan2012, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p8 

    This article analyzes the impact of the Voting Rights Act on elections in the U.S. It references some cases handled by the Supreme Court that employed the law. It discusses the establishment of the basic tenets of minority vote dilution claims. In addition, the article relates the law to an...

  • CAPERTON v. A. T. MASSEY COAL CO.: SOMETHING IS ROTTEN IN THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA--A COMMON- LAW APPROACH TO CONSTITUTIONAL JUDICIAL DISQUALIFICATION. Levin, Benjamin A. // Maryland Law Review;2010, Vol. 69 Issue 3, p637 

    The article discusses a court case where the U.S. Supreme Court had considered the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which would require a judge to disqualify himself from a hearing when one party had contributed to his judicial campaign. It argues that the court should have...

  • JUDGING IN A VACUUM, OR, ONCE MORE, WITHOUT FEELING: HOW JUSTICE SCALIA'S JURISPRUDENTIAL APPROACH REPEATS ERRORS MADE IN PLESSY V. FERGUSON. Edelson, Chris // Akron Law Review;2012, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p513 

    The article presents information on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in Plessy v. Ferguson. The decision acts as a reminder that the nation's most prestigious legal institution favored a system of racial segregation for a century after the Civil War and passage of the Fourteenth Amendment...

  • Another Race Case for a Hostile Supreme Court. Hannah-Jones, Nikole // Pro Publica;3/26/2013, p1 

    The article discusses the case of Schuette versus Michigan Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action that is set to be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court. It states that the affirmative action case will examine whether a ban on affirmative action in the state constitution of Michigan violates the 14th...

  • On Sex & Obscenity.  // Time;7/8/1957, Vol. 70 Issue 2, p12 

    The article focuses on the combined cases of New York trashmonger Samuel Roth and salesman David Alberts of Los Angeles, California related to sex and obscenity. It says that the main issue in Roth's case was whether the U.S. law abridged the First Amendment, while in Alberts' was whether the...

  • Brown v. Board of Education: 1954. Christianson, Stephen G. // Great American Trials;2003, p466 

    The article discusses the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. The appeal was filed by several parents of African-American children of elementary school age in Topeka, Kansas. The court held that segregated schools violate the equal protection clause of...

  • THE CHANGING LANDSCAPE OF FIREARM LEGISLATION IN THE WAKE OF McDonald v. City of Chicago, 130 S. CT. 3020 (2010). Nieto, Michael // Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy;Fall2011, Vol. 34 Issue 4, p1117 

    The article offers information about the U.S. Supreme Court case McDonald v. City of Chicago that related to the right to bear arms under the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It discusses the precedent court case District of Columbia v. Heller and the Privileges or Immunities Clause...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics