TITLE

DISCRETION IN CLASS CERTIFICATION

AUTHOR(S)
BARRINGTON WOLFF, TOBIAS
PUB. DATE
June 2014
SOURCE
University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Jun2014, Vol. 162 Issue 7, p1897
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses an abuse of discretion standard in class certification in America, focusing on the class action-related jurisprudence of various U.S. federal and district courts, as well as information about Rule 23 of the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which deals with class action proceedings in America. The U.S. Supreme Court and the fair and accurate adjudication of claims are mentioned, along with legal remedies in America. Several U.S. legal cases are also examined.
ACCESSION #
97478010

 

Related Articles

  • Identity Crisis: Class Certification, Aggregate Proof, and How Rule 23 May Be Self-Defeating the Policy for Which It Was Established. Whitbeck, J. Britton // Pace Law Review;Mar2012, Vol. 32 Issue 2, p488 

    The article discusses American class action lawsuits and class certification under Rule 23 of the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as of March 2012, focusing on the role of aggregate proof in the certification of classes. A historical overview of class action litigation is presented,...

  • OPENING ADDRESS. WHITEHOUSE, SHELDON // University of Pennsylvania Law Review;Jun2014, Vol. 162 Issue 7, p1517 

    The article presents an adaptation of a speech by U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse which was delivered as the opening address at "The Federal Rules at 75" symposium which was held at the University of Pennsylvania on November 15, 2013. America's Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and several U.S....

  • FRONT-LOADING, AVOIDANCE, AND OTHER FEATURES OF THE RECENT SUPREME COURT CLASS ACTION JURISPRUDENCE. Freer, Richard D. // Akron Law Review;2015, Vol. 48 Issue 4, p1 

    The article discusses what the author refers to as a trend towards front-loading class litigation in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court's issuance of several judgments in class action cases between 2010 and 2014, and it mention American jurisprudence, class arbitration waiver claims, and...

  • BROADENING THE SCOPE OF JUDICIAL GATEKEEPING: ADOPTING THE GOOD FAITH DOCTRINE IN CLASS ACTION PROCEEDINGS. TAUSSIG, ERAN B. // St. John's Law Review;Fall2009, Vol. 83 Issue 4, p1275 

    The article discusses the concept of good faith and its application in class action cases in U.S. federal courts. It contends that the adoption of a good faith prerequisite will enable federal class actions to achieve their goals. The merits and inherent problems of class actions are presented....

  • "CARVING AT THE JOINTS": USING ISSUE CLASSES TO REFRAME CONSUMER CLASS ACTIONS. Smith, Jenna C. // Washington Law Review;Oct2013, Vol. 88 Issue 3, p1187 

    Achieving class certification in consumer litigation is a highly controversial and greatly debated area of civil procedure. Historically, certification under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3) has been difficult to achieve due to the tension between the presence of individual issues and...

  • COMCAST CORP. V. BEHREND: COMMON QUESTIONS VERSUS INDIVIDUAL ANSWERS--WHICH WILL PREDOMINATE? Jacobs, Daniel // Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review;2014, Vol. 47 Issue 2, p505 

    The article discusses common questions and individual answers in relation to the U.S. Supreme Court case Comcast Corp. v. Behrend which deals with the decertification of a class of cable television service subscribers in the Philadelphia Designated Market Area (DMA). Class certification and...

  • IS THE CLASS ACTION REALLY DEAD? IS THAT GOOD OR BAD FOR CLASS MEMBERS? Vairo, Georgene // Emory Law Journal;2014, Vol. 64 Issue 2, p477 

    Recent Supreme Court decisions have tightened up the standards for obtaining class certification and virtually eliminate class arbitration as well. However, while the Court has made it more difficult for plaintiffs ' attorneys to use class resolution of claims as a prosecutorial tool, the lower...

  • PREVENTING DEFENDANTS FROMMOOTING CLASS ACTIONS BY PICKING OFF NAMED PLAINTIFFS. Koysza, David Hill // Duke Law Journal;Nov2003, Vol. 53 Issue 2, p781 

    The article discusses the relationship between Article II of the U.S. Constitution and the class action device. It highlights the application of the Supreme Court of mootness principles in the context of class action. It describes the practice of picking off named plaintiffs and details the...

  • New Developments in Removal of Cases to Federal Court. Vita, William E. // FDCC Quarterly;Fall2009, Vol. 60 Issue 1, p61 

    The article discusses the effect of the enactment of the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA) for the removal of class action cases on federal courts in the U.S. It notes that the battle of parties for removal petitions involves two fronts including the last-served defendant rule and the...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics