TITLE

High court weighs case of bias against dads

AUTHOR(S)
Marquand, Robert
PUB. DATE
November 1997
SOURCE
Christian Science Monitor;11/4/97, Vol. 89 Issue 238, p1
SOURCE TYPE
Newspaper
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Looks at the US Supreme Court case Albright v. Miller, which challenges a State Department law that makes it difficult for foreign children to claim United States citizenship based on their paternal ties. Why foreign children can lay claim to citizenship based on their mother's citizenship; Claims that the restrictions regarding to fathers violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution; How the government has responded to the case.
ACCESSION #
9711053612

 

Related Articles

  • When Fathers' Rights Are Mothers' Duties: The Failure of Equal Protection in Miller v. Albright. Collins, Kristin // Yale Law Journal;May2000, Vol. 109 Issue 7, p1669 

    Argues that the focus of equal protection analysis on the nexus of biological sex differences and parental rights is both misled and misleading when used to examine regulatory regimes that bear on parenting and reproduction. Opinions in Miller versus Albright that address Lorelyn Miller's equal...

  • CROSSING THE FINAL BORDER: SECURING EQUAL GENDER PROTECTION IN IMMIGRATION CASES. Sudano, Michelle L. // William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal;Mar2013, Vol. 21 Issue 3, p957 

    The article discusses the Supreme Court cases of the U.S., describing the inequitable and arbitrary state of the U.S. immigration law. Miller V. Albright case highlights that the U.S. Fifth Amendment of due process combats the gender discrimination under 8 U.S.C. sections 1409, wherein it...

  • The `GI sperm-scattering' statute. Ross-Fowler, Gigi // Off Our Backs;Jan98, Vol. 28 Issue 1, p13 

    Opinion. Comments on the case involving oral arguments of Miller v. Albright, which was held in the Supreme Court on November 4, 1997. Details on the petitioner, Ms. Lorelyn Penero Miller; Indepth look at the case.

  • Equal Protection and the Status of Stereotypes. Green, Roger Craig // Yale Law Journal;May99, Vol. 108 Issue 7, p1885 

    Presents a case study on the Miller versus Albright case which the United States Supreme Court tackled. Facts on the case; Arguments of the justice in their decision on the laws in contest on the case; Examination on the implication of the ruling on gender stereotyping.

  • Equality, truth, and the American way. Slade, David C. // World & I;Jul98, Vol. 13 Issue 7, p78 

    Presents the opinions rendered by the United States Supreme Court on the two cases that went to the constitutional core of American jurisprudence. Details on the case, Miller versus Albright; Opinions of the court on the case, United States versus Edward Scheffer.

  • Great news for children born 'out of wedlock' to U.S. citizen fathers. GURFINKEL, MICHAEL J. // Filipino Reporter;7/24/2015, Vol. 43 Issue 34, p33 

    The article discusses the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling about the rights of wedlock children born outside the U.S. to derive American citizenship at birth. Topics discussed include provisions of the U.S. immigration law relating to citizenship for wedlock children born to either...

  • The screening of constitutional rights.  // Las Vegas Business Press;06/14/99, Vol. 16 Issue 23, p4 

    Comments that the proposed changes in the United States immigration law will tarnish the image of the nation as a place where all people can depend on for equal protection. Lessons from the past; Loss of identity as a result of deviation from fundamental principles.

  • Status. Taylor, Kelley R. // Principal Leadership;Dec2012, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p8 

    The article focuses on immigration law principles regarding public schools. The use of an enrolling child's birth certificate to provide citizenship or immigration documentation as a violation of the Equal Protection clause of the U.S. Constitution is presented in the court case Hispanic...

  • FROM CITIZENSHIP TO CUSTODY: UNWED FATHERS ABROAD AND AT HOME. ANTOGNINI, ALBERTINA // Harvard Journal of Law & Gender;Summer2013, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p405 

    The sex-based distinctions of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") have been remarkably resilient in the face of numerous equal protection challenges. In Miller v. Albright, Nguyen v. INS, and most recently United States v. Flores-Villar--collectively the "citizenship transmission...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics