TITLE

Evaluating student learning with mock debates

AUTHOR(S)
Nicaise, Molly; Brown, Jennifer
PUB. DATE
January 1997
SOURCE
Contemporary Education;1997, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p131
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Analyzes the role of mock debates in student learning evaluation. Benefits of mock debates; Improvement of communication skills, application skills and general knowledge; Description and purpose of mock debates; Determination of student understanding; Stress on the issues of cost and time; Recommendations.
ACCESSION #
9706245883

 

Related Articles

  • Untitled. Pearce, Edward // New Statesman & Society;5/21/93, Vol. 6 Issue 253, p22 

    Opinion. Compares parliamentary debaters in Great Britain and those in other countries. American legislators as the worst; Comments on speeches in Germany and Australia; Reasons for British brilliance in polemics; Politicians in Britain that are noteworthy.

  • Assessing the jurisdictional model of topicality. Murphy, Thomas L. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p145 

    Examines the implications of topicality as a jurisdictional issue in debate. Definition of jurisdiction; Subject matter jurisdiction and the notion of guidance; Special appearance, waiver and reverse voting issues; Topicality and the special appearance analogy.

  • The jurisdiction/topicality analogy. Madsen, Arnie; Louden, Allan D. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p151 

    Comments on an article by Thomas L. Murphy about the jurisdiction standard of topicality in debate. Relationship between topicality and jurisdiction; Responses to indictments of the jurisdiction model; Topicality and the special appearance analogy.

  • Counterplan theory and the power to select resolutions. Ulrich, Walter R. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p154 

    Examines the counterplan theory and the power to select resolutions in debate. Domains of a resolution and topical counterplan theory; Topic selection as a selection of focus in the debate.

  • Hats off.  // New Hampshire Business Review;9/1/95, Vol. 17 Issue 18, p5 

    Reports on the debate at Salem High School, New Hampshire, regarding whether to ban all headgear in school for reasons other than religion, health or safety.

  • Great debate! Butz, Carol S. // Reading Teacher;Apr95, Vol. 48 Issue 7, p618 

    Relates the experience of the author in conducting a debate in the classroom. Ground rules for debate; Details of the debate session.

  • Dumbed down debates. Myers, Dennis // Las Vegas Business Press;07/13/98, Vol. 15 Issue 28, p4 

    Opinion. Discusses the role of content-rich debates in politics. Reinforcement of all the flaws in the election process; Reempowerment of debates if the candidates could be denied control of the formats and panelists; Principal level at which debates really work at informing the public.

  • Candidates to debate in San Marcos. Murdock, Pat // Hays Free Press (Buda, TX);10/8/2008, Vol. 105 Issue 27, p1C 

    The announces the public invitation for the San Marcos Area League of Women Voters Candidates Debate in San Marcos, Texas.

  • Adding balance to political debate.  // Indianapolis Business Journal;6/5/95, Vol. 16 Issue 10, p6A 

    Editorial. Discusses the importance of strong ideas for political debates. Effect on the political outcome by candidates using old ideas; Role in the creation of public policies; Significance of balancing diverse views from various political sides.

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics