TITLE

REASONS FOR THE NEGLECTED KHOJALY GENOCIDE IN THE NEGLECTED NAGORNO-KARABAKH CONFLICT

AUTHOR(S)
MAMMADOVA, Jeylan
PUB. DATE
March 2013
SOURCE
Uluslararasi Suçlar ve Tarih;2013, Issue 14, p37
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
If "more than 600 people were killed" intentionally by one group of people on February 26, 1992 in Khojaly, Azerbaian, why is it that the dominant member states of the international community- specifically the European Union (EU), the Organization of Security and Co-Operation in Europe (OSCE), and the United Nations Security Council (UNSC)-have not accepted that the massacre was genocide, while only three states, Mexico, Pakistan and Colombia, have already recognized it as such ("Pakistani Senate Recognizes" 2012)? Global powers do not recognize the case as genocide, not because the killings were not committed at a level of genocide, but because of two key factors: first, confirmation of the occurrence of the genocide does not benefit their international political and economic interests and second, recognition does not benefit their internal political interests (defined by interest groups). This research paper develops an existing argument of the primacy of the theory of Realpolitik in light of neglected human rights issues, in this case the Khojaly massacre. The paper builds on the main theory of the clash between human rights and realism and then outlines the shortcomings of the limited literature on the Khojaly massacre. The paper focuses on nine countries that have played an important role in the discussion of the recognition of the massacre (U.S., Russia, France, Germany, Turkey, Israel, Pakistan, Mexico, and UK), and observes their current approach to the issue through expert opinion and data that strongly yields evidence for the realist approach of certain countries in discussing the Khojaly massacre.
ACCESSION #
95546448

 

Related Articles

  • Al-Skeini and Al-Jedda in Strasbourg. Milanovic, Marko // European Journal of International Law;Jan2012, Vol. 23 Issue 1, p121 

    The article analyses the European Court of Human Rights’ recent judgments in Al-Skeini v. United Kingdom and Al-Jedda v. United Kingdom. The former is set to become the leading Strasbourg authority on the extraterritorial application of the ECHR; the latter presents significant...

  • The Democratizing Effects of Transjudicial Coordination. Benvenisti, Eyal; Downs, George W. // Utrecht Law Review;May2012, Vol. 8 Issue 2, p158 

    The article discusses transjudicial coordination that impacts international democracy. Topics discussed include national courts in democratic countries, the European Court of Justice (ECJ), and the United Nations (UN) Security Council. Other topics include the U.S. Supreme Court, European Court...

  • Council conclusions on abductions in Nigeria.  // African Business News;5/12/2014, p6 

    The article reports on a resolution supported by the European Union (EU) and its Member States, which aims to defeat terrorist attacks and promote human protection in northern Nigeria. Topics include the abduction of 200 schoolgirls in Borno State, the violations on human rights and dignity, and...

  • U.N., EU OK Iran Nuke Deal. Investor's Business Daily // Investors Business Daily;7/21/2015, pA01 

    10 The top officer of Iran's Revolutionary Guard warned "we will never accept" the final proposal to limit Iran's nuclear weapons ambition in order to lift sanctions. But the U.N. Security Council unanimously assented to make the world "safer and more secure," as U.S. Amb. Samantha Power put it....

  • THE PLACE OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN INVESTOR-STATE ARBITRATION. Karamanian, Susan L. // Lewis & Clark Law Review;2013, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p423 

    Human rights arguments are appearing with increased frequency in investor-state arbitration. States and amici curiae may raise them as defenses to the challenged state action. Occasionally, investors rely on human rights principles, such as due process and non-discrimination, to support their...

  • Afghanistan.  // UN Chronicle;1998, Vol. 35 Issue 4, p58 

    Reports that the United Nations Security Council is concerned by the deteriorating humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan in 1998. Proposal to promote respect for minimum humanitarian standards; Condemnation on the Taliban gropup's criminal acts; Demands of the Security Council on the Taliban and...

  • From Kadi to Nada: Judicial Techniques Favouring Human Rights over United Nations Security Council Sanctions. de Wet, Erika // Chinese Journal of International Law;Dec2013, Vol. 12 Issue 4, p787 

    This contribution analyses the implications of the Kadi decision of the European Court of Justice of July 2013 and the Nada decision of the European Court of Human Rights of September 2013. Both decisions have given preference to human rights standards over United Nations Security Council (UNSC)...

  • Strengthening the Rule of Law, but Fragmenting International Law: The Kadi Decision of the ECJ from the Perspective of Human Rights. Ziegler, Katja S. // Human Rights Law Review;Apr2009, Vol. 9 Issue 2, p288 

    The article discusses a court case wherein the European Court of Justice decided in favor of the applicants who successfully challenged a Council Regulation which was adopted in order to implement United Nations (UN) Security Council Resolutions. In Kadi and Al Barakaat v Council of the European...

  • No U.N. Security Council Reform, No Problem Weitz, Richard // World Politics Review;1/4/2011, p3 

    The article examines the issues involved in the reform of the United Nations Security Council. The goal of the reform debate is to change the Security Council to make it more representative and democratic. Main issues arising from the reform debate are cited. The expansion of the Security...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics