TITLE

Great debate!

AUTHOR(S)
Butz, Carol S.
PUB. DATE
April 1995
SOURCE
Reading Teacher;Apr95, Vol. 48 Issue 7, p618
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Relates the experience of the author in conducting a debate in the classroom. Ground rules for debate; Details of the debate session.
ACCESSION #
9504110885

 

Related Articles

  • Untitled. Pearce, Edward // New Statesman & Society;5/21/93, Vol. 6 Issue 253, p22 

    Opinion. Compares parliamentary debaters in Great Britain and those in other countries. American legislators as the worst; Comments on speeches in Germany and Australia; Reasons for British brilliance in polemics; Politicians in Britain that are noteworthy.

  • Assessing the jurisdictional model of topicality. Murphy, Thomas L. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p145 

    Examines the implications of topicality as a jurisdictional issue in debate. Definition of jurisdiction; Subject matter jurisdiction and the notion of guidance; Special appearance, waiver and reverse voting issues; Topicality and the special appearance analogy.

  • The jurisdiction/topicality analogy. Madsen, Arnie; Louden, Allan D. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p151 

    Comments on an article by Thomas L. Murphy about the jurisdiction standard of topicality in debate. Relationship between topicality and jurisdiction; Responses to indictments of the jurisdiction model; Topicality and the special appearance analogy.

  • Counterplan theory and the power to select resolutions. Ulrich, Walter R. // Argumentation & Advocacy;Spring90, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p154 

    Examines the counterplan theory and the power to select resolutions in debate. Domains of a resolution and topical counterplan theory; Topic selection as a selection of focus in the debate.

  • Hats off.  // New Hampshire Business Review;9/1/95, Vol. 17 Issue 18, p5 

    Reports on the debate at Salem High School, New Hampshire, regarding whether to ban all headgear in school for reasons other than religion, health or safety.

  • Evaluating student learning with mock debates. Nicaise, Molly; Brown, Jennifer // Contemporary Education;1997, Vol. 68 Issue 2, p131 

    Analyzes the role of mock debates in student learning evaluation. Benefits of mock debates; Improvement of communication skills, application skills and general knowledge; Description and purpose of mock debates; Determination of student understanding; Stress on the issues of cost and time;...

  • Dumbed down debates. Myers, Dennis // Las Vegas Business Press;07/13/98, Vol. 15 Issue 28, p4 

    Opinion. Discusses the role of content-rich debates in politics. Reinforcement of all the flaws in the election process; Reempowerment of debates if the candidates could be denied control of the formats and panelists; Principal level at which debates really work at informing the public.

  • Candidates to debate in San Marcos. Murdock, Pat // Hays Free Press (Buda, TX);10/8/2008, Vol. 105 Issue 27, p1C 

    The announces the public invitation for the San Marcos Area League of Women Voters Candidates Debate in San Marcos, Texas.

  • Adding balance to political debate.  // Indianapolis Business Journal;6/5/95, Vol. 16 Issue 10, p6A 

    Editorial. Discusses the importance of strong ideas for political debates. Effect on the political outcome by candidates using old ideas; Role in the creation of public policies; Significance of balancing diverse views from various political sides.

Share

Read the Article

Other Topics