TITLE

KANT ON TELEOLOGICAL THINKING AND ITS FAILURES

AUTHOR(S)
BAUM, MANFRED
PUB. DATE
October 2013
SOURCE
Washington University Jurisprudence Review;2013, Vol. 6 Issue 1, p27
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses the idea of purposiveness in nature presented by philosopher Immanuel Kant. It notes that the purposive quality attributed to plants and animals comes from human theory. The author infers that "teleology" as a means to judge the causality of nature is a paradoxical concept. In relation to this, the article asserts that Kant can only be considered a theorist of judgment due to his inability to validate his subjective view of natural law.
ACCESSION #
94509511

 

Related Articles

  • Kant's Derivation of the Formula of Universal Law. MCCARTY, RICHARD // Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review;Mar2010, Vol. 49 Issue 1, p113 

    Critics have charged that there are gaps in the logic of Kant's derivation of the formula of universal law. Here I defend that derivation against these charges, partly by emphasizing a neglected teleological principle that Kant alluded to in his argument, and partly by clarifying what he meant...

  • Between Bodies and Pleasures: A Territory Without a Domain. Hengehold, Laura // Foucault Studies;Feb2013, Issue 15, p148 

    Foucault's debt to Kant is usually examined with respect to his ethos of critique. In fact, Kant's writings on aesthetic judgment, teleological judgment, and anthropology consti-tute an important, if implicit, object of Foucault's genealogical efforts to free Western culture from a scientia...

  • A doutrina do método na terceira Crítica. Aparecida Martins, Clélia // Studia Kantiana;2012, Issue 12, p110 

    The Doctrine of the method of the Critique of judgement concerns the faculty of teleological judgement (§ 79-91). In the beginning of this Appendix (§ 79), Kant aims on clarifying how teleological thought, according to the principle of final cause, interprets the essence and the phenomena...

  • Kant on Virtue. Dierksmeier, Claus // Journal of Business Ethics;Apr2013, Vol. 113 Issue 4, p597 

    In business ethics journals, Kant's ethics is often portrayed as overly formalistic, devoid of substantial content, and without regard for the consequences of actions or questions of character. Hence, virtue ethicists ride happily to the rescue, offering to replace or complement Kant's theory...

  • Kant on Property: The Problem of Permissive Law. Tierney, Brian // Journal of the History of Ideas;Apr2001, Vol. 62 Issue 2, p301 

    Discusses the internal structure of the Doctrine of Right for inquiry on Kant's appeal to permissive natural law in theory of property. Argument on the existence of unjust state constitution in permissive laws of reason; Conflict on natural law from the argument of Kant; Consideration of...

  • Editorial preface. Hall, Ronald // International Journal for Philosophy of Religion;Apr2013, Vol. 73 Issue 2, p81 

    An introduction to the journal is presented in which the editor discusses various reports published within the issue, including one on the moral life of God, one on philosopher Immanuel Kant's view of sacrifice, and another on the issue of depraved human condition.

  • Attack Modes. WEBSTER, ALEXANDER F. C. // Touchstone: A Journal of Mere Christianity;Mar/Apr2016, Vol. 29 Issue 2, p20 

    A personal narrative is presented which explores the author's experience of discussing the ethics of German philosopher Immanuel Kant in an undergraduate course on moral philosophy at American University in the spring of 2001.

  • Are Deontology and Teleology Mutually Exclusive? Macdonald, James E.; Beck-Dudley, Caryn L. // Journal of Business Ethics;Aug94, Vol. 13 Issue 8, p615 

    Current discussions of business ethics usually only consider deontological and utilitarian approaches. What is missing is a discussion of traditional teleology, often referred to as "virtue ethics." While deontology and teleology are useful, they both suffer insufficiencies. Traditional...

  • Why Business Ethics Needs Rhetoric: An Aristotelian Perspective. Duska, Ronald F. // Business Ethics Quarterly;Jan2014, Vol. 24 Issue 1, p119 

    If the ultimate purpose of ethical argument is to persuade people to act a certain way, the point of doing business ethics is to persuade others about what constitutes proper ethical behavior. Given that teleological perspective, the role of the business ethicist is to be an orator or...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics