February 2014
Corporate Knights Magazine;Winter2014, Vol. 13 Issue 1, p58
The article discusses evidence showing that nuclear energy has always been significantly more expensive than alternative energy sources. Topics addressed include its higher cost compared to low-carbon alternatives, the implications of offering a feed-in tariff (FIT) to nuclear power developers, and large transmission costs imposed by very large nuclear reactors. Also mentioned are the social cost of carbon in the long-term climate perspective and nuclear power's macroeconomic impact.


Related Articles

  • Optimal fuel utilization during decommissioning of nuclear power plants with RBMK reactors. A. Fedosov // Atomic Energy;May2007, Vol. 102 Issue 5, p353 

    Abstract  When RBMK reactors are decommissioned successively in the same nuclear power plant, part of the fuel of the stopped reactors can be transferred to other units and additionally burned in continuing operations. The problem of minimizing the consumption of fresh fuel by...

  • Nuclear Power--A Dead Loss. Bunyard, Peter // Ecologist;Nov99, Vol. 29 Issue 7, p412 

    Provides information on the economic aspects of nuclear energy. Economics of nuclear power plants in Great Britain; Details on nuclear reactors in the United States; Costs of nuclear power plant construction.

  • 1.0 Executive Summary.  // Global Nuclear Energy Report;2011, p11 

    The article offers an overview on the application of nuclear energy in the world. It mentions its significant use in power generation as well as in ship propulsion and medical treatments. It notes the contribution of its power to electricity supply which varies greatly among countries with...

  • Out of the Shadows: Can Japan's Nuclear Power Renaissance Reduce Global Emissions? McNeill, David // Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus;9/15/2008, Issue 37, p1 

    The article reports on Japan's nuclear power renaissance. Japan has announced a 60-80 percent cut in greenhouse gases by 2050, one of the most ambitious national targets. Japan relies on 52 nuclear reactors for about a third of its power generation needs, but aims to push this to 40 percent...

  • Preliminary Design Study of Medium Sized Gas Cooled Fast Reactor with Natural Uranium as Fuel Cycle Input. Meriyanti; Su'ud, Zaki; Rijal, K.; Zuhair; Ferhat, A.; Sekimoto, H. // AIP Conference Proceedings;6/22/2010, Vol. 1244 Issue 1, p62 

    In this study a fesibility design study of medium sized (1000 MWt) gas cooled fast reactors which can utilize natural uranium as fuel cycle input has been conducted. Gas Cooled Fast Reactor (GFR) is among six types of Generation IV Nuclear Power Plants. GFR with its hard neuron spectrum is...

  • 3.0 Statistics of nuclear energy and power.  // Global Nuclear Energy Report;2011, p63 

    The article reports on the statistics of nuclear energy worldwide. It offers an overview of its global consumption in 1965 which reached 6 million tonnes of oil equivalent (Mtoe) increasing to 636 in 2006 but fell by 611 in 2009. It notes that the said decrease was due to the rise of natural gas...

  • Power to the people or regulatory ratcheting? Explaining the success (or failure) of attempts to site commercial US nuclear power plants: 1954-1996. Berndt, Eric; Aldrich, Daniel P. // International Journal of Energy Research;6/10/2016, Vol. 40 Issue 7, p903 

    Between 1954 and 1996, more than 200 nuclear power projects were publicly announced in the USA. Barely half of these projects were completed and generated power commercially. Existing research has highlighted a number of potential explanations for the varying siting outcomes of these projects,...

  • Make up your mind already. Levine, Samantha // U.S. News & World Report;8/6/2001, Vol. 131 Issue 5, p30 

    Discusses the Fast Flux Test Facility in Richland, Washington. How the nuclear reactor has been idling for eight years at a high cost to taxpayers; Reasons why the original purpose of the project has been sustained; Possible plans for the reactor.

  • GOING NUCLEAR. Whitford, David // Fortune;8/6/2007, Vol. 156 Issue 3, p42 

    The article discusses the reluctance towards nuclear power within the U.S. Many are unaware that 20% of U.S. electricity comes from nuclear power. The author looks back on the Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station, which generated much public fear of nuclear reactors. With a socially...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics