TITLE

Democrats: Kings of Crony Corporatism

AUTHOR(S)
Eddlem, Thomas R.
PUB. DATE
February 2014
SOURCE
New American (08856540);2/17/2014, Vol. 30 Issue 4, p21
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article focuses on the complaint of the Democrats against the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the 2009 Citizens United case which permit companies to spend unlimited money on election communications. It states that the Democratic Party was found to be a more reliable supporter of crony capitalism than the Republican Party. It mentions that the U.S. Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) vote has strengthened the opposition to taxpayer subsidies for corporations by the Republicans.
ACCESSION #
94260348

 

Related Articles

  • Leveling the Money Playing Field. Slade, Stephanie // U.S. News Digital Weekly;2/21/2014, Vol. 6 Issue 8, p18 

    The author discusses a decision of the Supreme Court on reversing a law that prohibits labor unions and corporations from spending money on political speeches to influence election outcomes in the case Citizens United v. Federal Electoral Commission. She agrees that liberal defenders of the...

  • Who's Your Donor?  // New Republic;11/11/2010, Vol. 241 Issue 18, p1 

    In this article the author discusses aspects of campaign funding in light of the "Citizens United" case adjudicated by the U.S. Supreme Court. The "Citizens United" case ruled that corporate and union funding of independent political advertising cannot be limited and is not subject to disclosure...

  • Building a Permanent Majority for Reform. Feingold, Russ // Democracy: A Journal of Ideas;Winter2013, Issue 27, p45 

    The article offers the author's insights on the need for the U.S. Democratic Party to build a mandate for reform to avoid corporate-dominated policy-making and to regain credibility in the country. He relates the decision of the Supreme Court on the case of Citizens United which reflects the...

  • In Defense of Citizens United. Hubbard, Glenn; Kane, Tim // Foreign Affairs;Jul/Aug2013, Vol. 92 Issue 4, p126 

    The article looks at politics and government in the U.S. as of 2013, focusing on campaign finance. The authors present a case for the view that restrictions on political campaign fundraising, beginning with the 1971 U.S. Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), are responsible for the polarization...

  • Economic Stimulus of October 2010. Stein, Robert // Moderate Voice;10/6/2010, p4 

    The article reports on the economic stimulus for October 2010 in the U.S. It mentions that the Congress is supplying much money directly in the economy. It notes that Republicans has spearheaded the stimulus by 80 million dollars and the Democrats has raked 16 million dollars. It cites that both...

  • Bernie Sanders. Nichols, John // Progressive;Nov2013, Vol. 77 Issue 11, p35 

    An interview with Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders is presented. When asked about why he is not a democrat, he said that the U.S. Democratic Party doesn't represents him. He further discusses statements made by him before the 2012 elections. He also informed about a constitutional amendment filed...

  • Dark-Money Dems. Miller, Zeke // Time;11/25/2013, Vol. 182 Issue 22, p20 

    The article discusses the U.S. Democratic Party in relation to campaign financing, independent expenditure political action committees (super PACs), and the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Citizens United case which reportedly overturned a restriction which prevented corporations and others...

  • Party Allies Raising Millions. Stone, Peter H. // National Journal;4/17/2010, p24 

    The article focuses on the American Action Network that was established by former Minnesota senator Norm Coleman in 2010. The network is expected to operate in approximately 10 U.S. Senate races. The creation of the network is also in line with the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in the case Citizens...

  • After Souter.  // National Review;5/25/2009, Vol. 61 Issue 9, p15 

    The article discusses the career of U.S. Supreme Court justice David Souter and how his resignation will impact the decisions of the court. The author explains that Souter was initially supported by Republican party members but ultimately become a reliable vote for the Democratic side. The...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics