Where Are the Great Powers?

Luttwak, Edward N.
July 1994
Foreign Affairs;Jul/Aug1994, Vol. 73 Issue 4, p23
Analyzes the reasons why great powers refuse to tolerate combat in embattled nations. Democracy; `Mothernism' and family; Constrictions to use of force; Low birth rates; Ways for a great power to retain status without sacrificing principles; Cases.


Related Articles

  • Why is the West scared? Elliott, Michael // Newsweek;2/14/1994, Vol. 123 Issue 7, p24 

    Considers why the `Great Powers' have been so conspicuously absent in the war in Bosnia. Reasons for the lack of public demand in either Europe or the United States for military intervention; Effects of World War II and the Korean and Vietnam wars; Lack of a `Bosnian-American' community.

  • A necessary balance. Cahill, Kevin M. // America;8/28/1993, Vol. 169 Issue 5, p6 

    Emphasizes the need for more humane approaches in solving world problems. Armed intervention as not an answer to civil conflicts; Foreign countries or the United Nation's army intervention as never justifiable; Dangers in quick-fix military solutions to complex problems; Role of a person close...

  • Promises, promises. Finnegan, William // New Yorker;8/7/95, Vol. 71 Issue 23, p4 

    Opinion. Discusses why the actions done by the West in Bosnia could be considered as empty threats. Difficulty in selling American-led intervention to stop genocide in the Balkans to sell politically in the United States.

  • Somalia and the Future of Humanitarian Intervention. Clarke, Walter; Herbst, Jeffrey // Foreign Affairs;Mar/Apr96, Vol. 75 Issue 2, p70 

    Assesses the United States role in foreign armed humanitarian interventions in the post-Cold War era. Calls for a reevaluation of US `peace' missions; Denunciation of President Bill Clinton's pre-election rhetoric of assertive multilateralism; US intervention in Somalia as a precedent of future...

  • Country Overview.  // Dominican Republic Country Review;2012, p1 

    The article offers information on the political and economic conditions of Dominican Republic including its independence in 1844, American military intervention, and political instability.

  • THE GOOD COUNTRY. KANE, TIM // Commentary;Dec2014, Vol. 138 Issue 5, p13 

    The article presents an exploration of U.S. foreign military policy and positive development outcomes, challenging the non-interventionist philosophy of U.S. President Barack Obama. The author suggests that the U.S. is a unique and great country particularly because it exerts force in other...

  • Strange Bedfellows: The Strategic Dynamics of Major Power Military Interventions. Gent, Stephen E. // Journal of Politics;Nov2007, Vol. 69 Issue 4, p1089 

    Intuition suggests that major powers should be more likely to pursue joint military intervention when their preferences are most similar, but empirically, joint interventions are least likely in these cases. The solution to this puzzle lies in the strategic interaction between interveners. When...

  • Iraq Seen From the Right. Buckley Jr., Wm. F. // National Review;12/22/1997, Vol. 49 Issue 24, p74 

    The article argues that the U.S. must assert its status as a world superpower by disarming forcefully the regime of Iraqi President Saddam Hussein of its atomic, biological and chemical weapons. The U.S. can only do this on its own. It can not rely on other members of the United Nations...

  • SOVEREIGN STATE - THE CLASSIC BASIC SUBJECT OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW. FLOREA, Dumitriţa; GALEŞ, Narcisa // USV Annals of Economics & Public Administration;2012, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p262 

    The problem of subjects holds a central place in national and international law and is one central to the general theory of law nationally and internationally, respectively. The whole motivation of the existence of law is focused on determining the recipients of the rules it contains. It is...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics