TITLE

GOING BALLISTIC

AUTHOR(S)
Timmerman, Kenneth R.
PUB. DATE
January 1994
SOURCE
New Republic;1/24/94, Vol. 210 Issue 4, p12
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Expresses opinion on the issue of a pact entered into by the U.S. and North Korea in December 1993 in relation to North Korea's nuclear facilities and the U.S. relations with South Korea. State of nuclear investigations in North Korea; Account of North Korea's nuclear intentions; Conditions included under the pact.
ACCESSION #
9401137521

 

Related Articles

  • Should We Buy the Vladivostok Agreement? Long, F. A. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Feb1975, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p5 

    The article reflects on the Vladivostok agreement, an agreement between the United States and USSR which was intended to control the strategic nuclear arms race. Comments about the limitations of the agreement including the control of the strategic delivery systems of the U.S. and the Soviet...

  • Responding to a Nuclear Iran. Hemmer, Christopher // Parameters: U.S. Army War College;Fall2007, Vol. 37 Issue 3, p42 

    The article examines the foreign policy of the U.S. in discouraging Iran from developing nuclear weapons. The impact of the Iran's nuclear policy on the economic interest of the U.S. around the Persian Gulf., as well as the cost of taking military actions. Deterring Iran from using the weapons,...

  • Draw the line at Star Wars. Brown, Harrison // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan/Feb1987, Vol. 43 Issue 1, p3 

    Comments on the nuclear arms control negotiations between the U.S. and the Soviet Union. Chronology of talks between U.S. and Soviet leaders; Soviet proposal that they would agree to major items on the condition that the U.S. drop its plans to field test Strategic Defense Initiative weaponry;...

  • The New Nuclear Danger. Cortright, David // America;12/11/2006, Vol. 195 Issue 19, p18 

    This article discusses the flaw of the strategy of selective coercion adopted by the Bush administration after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. The Iraq war was a demonstration of this strategy. Ironically, the Iraq War only steeled the determination of other countries which the U.S....

  • If We Survive the Next 100 Years, Which Came First: Nuclear Abolition or World Peace? Wellen, Russ // Foreign Policy in Focus;6/15/2011, p5 

    The article discusses which came first, nuclear abolition or world peace. It cites a paper issued by Hudson Institute fellow Christopher Ford who details the challenges of a possible transitional stage to Global Zero or nuclear abolition. It stresses the importance of having significant...

  • The hands move closer to midnight. Feld, Bernard T. // Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists;Jan1981, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p1 

    The article reports that as the year 1980 is drawing to a close, the world is perilously moving closer to a nuclear suicide. The Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union is in doldrums. At this juncture, the rising public opinion against the arms race...

  • Nuclear Arms Treaties and Negotiations: A Historical Overview.  // World Almanac & Book of Facts;2008, p852 

    An almanac entry for historical overview of nuclear arms treaties and negotiations is presented. On August 5, 1963, Partial (Limited) Test Ban Treaty was signed by U.S., USSR, and Britain in Moscow, and it went into effect October 10, 1963. On January 27, 1967, the Treaty on Principles Governing...

  • Notes from the Editors.  // Monthly Review: An Independent Socialist Magazine;Apr2006, Vol. 57 Issue 11, p1 

    Comments on the intensification of the threats of a U.S. military intervention in Iran in response to Washington's claims that Iran is attempting to develop nuclear weapons capabilities, as of February 2006. Findings of a public poll in January 2006 regarding U.S. citizens' attitude toward...

  • Turkey finally sides with U.S. on Iran threat.  // Geo-Strategy Direct;1/18/2006, p3 

    Reports on the decision of the Turkish Foreign Ministry to support the efforts of the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush to condemn Iran for its refusal to cooperate with the International Atomic Energy Agency. Threat posed by the nuclear program of Iran; Approach taken by the Bush...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics