TITLE

Occasionalisrn Isn't Science

AUTHOR(S)
DERBYSHIRE, JOHN
PUB. DATE
January 2014
SOURCE
American Spectator;Jan/Feb2014, Vol. 47 Issue 1, p16
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article discusses various aspects of intelligent design and the efforts of its proponents to discredit orthodox biology. The author says intelligent design and its supporters have failed to gain the respect of mainstream science. Some critics' assertion that promoters of intelligent design are running a racket is also highlighted. The author claims most scientists believe intelligent design is not science.
ACCESSION #
93404268

 

Related Articles

  • The science in the intelligent design debate: teach it like it is. Bateman, Philip W.; Moran-Ellis, Jo // South African Journal of Science;Jul2007, Vol. 103 Issue 7/8, p271 

    INTELLIGENT DESIGN,THE NEW INCARNATION of creationism, is appearing in schools and universities across the world. The stock response by scientists seems to be: 'It is not science'. What proponents of intelligent design and irreducible complexity have managed to do, however, is introduce enough...

  • Can Science Detect Design in Nature? van der Burgt, Peter J. M. // Yearbook of the Irish Philosophical Society;Jan2008, p110 

    In recent years there has been a renewed interest in the design argument, which states that the seemingly purposeful features of the natural world point to the existence of a supernatural designer. The purpose of this article is to give a brief survey of the fine-tuning of the fundamental...

  • Defending science education against intelligent design: a call to action. Attie, Alan D.; Sober, Elliot; Numbers, Ronald L.; Amasino, Richard M.; Cox, Beth; Berceau, Terese; Powell, Thomas; Cox, Michael M. // Journal of Clinical Investigation;May2006, Vol. 116 Issue 5, p1134 

    We review here the current political landscape and our own efforts to address the attempts to undermine science education in Wisconsin. To mount an effective response, expertise in evolutionary biology and in the history of the public controversy is useful but not essential. However, entering...

  • How Not to Attack Intelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical Misconceptions About Methodological Naturalism. Boudry, Maarten; Blancke, Stefaan; Braeckman, Johan // Foundations of Science;Aug2010, Vol. 15 Issue 3, p227 

    In recent controversies about Intelligent Design Creationism (IDC), the principle of methodological naturalism (MN) has played an important role. In this paper, an often neglected distinction is made between two different conceptions of MN, each with its respective rationale and with a different...

  • "Intelligent Design": A Lamb in Wolf's Clothing. Dobson, Geoffrey // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Sep/Oct2006, Vol. 26 Issue 5, p34 

    The article presents the author's comments on intelligent design (ID) practices. He criticized ID advocates who claim that ID should be taught in the science classroom as an alternative to the theory of natural selection. He explained why ID advocates particularly focus on scientist Chales...

  • Gaps, Design, & "Theistic" Evolution: A Counter Reply to Robert A. Larmer. Lamoureux, Denis O. // Christian Scholar's Review;Fall2007, Vol. 37 Issue 1, p101 

    The author offers a counter reply to Robert A. Larmer for his comments on his paper presented in "Intelligent Design and Theistic Evolution: A Reply to Dennis Lamoureux." The author outlines problems that he observed in the origins controversy which include the difficulty with the term theistic...

  • The Little Engine That Could... Undo Darwinism. Peterson, Dan // American Spectator;Jun2005, Vol. 38 Issue 5, p34 

    Discusses the religious and scientific implications of intelligent design (ID). Concept of ID based on biological sciences and the theory of creationism; Background on the proponents of ID who are affiliated with the Center for Science and Culture in Seattle, Washington; Difference between...

  • Intelligent Design: Scientific Theory or Religious Conviction? Greenawalt, Kent // Journal of Church & State;Spring2003, Vol. 45 Issue 2, p237 

    Analyzes the religious and scientific aspects of the theory of intelligent design. Comparison between Darwin's evolution theory and the creation theory; Evidence which support the theory; Inferences of intelligent design theory; Issues on teaching religion.

  • Intelligent design theory belongs in the science classroom. Betty, Stafford // National Catholic Reporter;10/21/2005, Vol. 42 Issue 1, p23 

    Focuses on the stands of the author about the issue of introducing intelligent design in public schools in the U.S. Assertion that intelligent design theory belongs in the science classroom; Favorableness of the author on the issue of integrating intelligent design in public schools; Association...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of VIRGINIA BEACH PUBLIC LIBRARY AND SYSTEM

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics