TITLE

Why Candidates Hate Fundraising

AUTHOR(S)
Lewis, Brandon
PUB. DATE
September 2013
SOURCE
Campaigns & Elections (2010);Sep/Oct2013, Issue 320, p28
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
This article discusses why candidates running for public office detest fundraising. The author offers three main reasons bets hate fundraising and they are first, fundraising can be tedious, boring and repetitious. Second, it offers a steady stream of rejection, refusal and dismissal from friends, associates and total strangers. And third, fundraising is emotionally distressing for lazy people. The article also discusses how campaign consultants can make candidates embrace the task.
ACCESSION #
91608471

 

Related Articles

  • This Time, McAuliffe Is Selling Himself. Skalka, Jennifer // National Journal;5/23/2009, p17 

    The article reports that Virginia gubernatorial candidate Terry McAuliffe is concentrating on his political advancement and on raising enough money to steamroll his party rivals. The primary race has been transformed by McAuliffe by merely entering it. It is noted that his rivals cannot match...

  • GOP turns to self-funding candidates. Wilson, Reid // Hill;10/27/2009, Vol. 16 Issue 125, p22 

    The article focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of an alleged strategy of U.S. House Republicans on turning to wealthy political candidates, who are able to finance their own campaigns, in 2009.

  • CAMPAIGN FINANCE. N. W. // American Prospect;Dec2010, Vol. 21 Issue 10, p19 

    This section offers news briefs related to campaign finance in the U.S., including the disclosure of election spending in the U.S. and the lack of real-time data in relation to the political contributions of political candidates.

  • Consultant/client signings.  // Campaigns & Elections (1996);Jul98, Vol. 19 Issue 7, p13 

    Presents a list of political consultants tapped to help the candidacy of certain political candidates in the United States. Allyn & Co.; Bennett, Petts & Blumenthal; Capitol Campaign Strategies; Conover Millar Group; Fletcher & Rowley; Greener and Hook; TotalCom; Commonwealth Consultants.

  • Consultant/client signings.  // Campaigns & Elections (1996);Aug98, Vol. 19 Issue 8, p13 

    Lists names of American political consultants and their clients as of August 1998. Includes Baughman Group; Arnold Linhardt; SCM Associates; Blaemire & Associates; Welch Norma & Coley; Names of clients.

  • The candidates and their consultants.  // National Journal;11/4/96, Vol. 28 Issue 44, p2350 

    Presents a chart listing the candidates and their consultants for the November 1996 senatorial elections in the United States.

  • $1.2 billion can buy 'access' to Congress, but not much else. Guebert, Alan // Farm & Dairy;10/9/2014, Vol. 101 Issue 3, pA7 

    The article examines what U.S. politicians believe as access to the U.S. Congress by individuals and political action committees with their nearly 1.2 billion dollar contribution to Republican and Democratic candidates in the U.S. House and Senate in the 2014 election cycle.

  • Talking politics. K. H. // TCU Magazine;Fall2012, Vol. 56 Issue 3, p19 

    An interview with Texas Christian University (TCU) chair of political science Joanne Green is presented. Green shares her views on whether the presidential candidate who brought more campaign money will win the election, as the Supreme Court ends the limit on corporate campaign spending. Green...

  • Money and Virtue.  // America;9/4/1926, Vol. 35 Issue 21, p487 

    The article reflects on the practice by political candidates in Pennsylvania and Illinois to spend great amount of money during their campaigns. It compares the amount of campaign funds expended by U.S. politicians to British politicians, emphasizing that the latter spent remarkably less. It...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics