TITLE

CRA 3 and the liability of rating agencies: inconsistent messages from the regulation on credit rating agencies in Europe

AUTHOR(S)
EDWARDS, HARRY
PUB. DATE
August 2013
SOURCE
Law & Financial Markets Review;Aug2013, Vol. 7 Issue 4, p186
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
On 31 May 2013, Regulation (EU) No 462/2013 ("CRA 3"), containing the latest amendments to Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 on credit rating agencies (the "CRA Regulation"), was published in the Official Journal. CRA 3 represents the third instalment of Europe's legislative response to the perceived role played by credit rating agencies during, and since, the financial crisis. Although the purported overall theme of CRA 3 - to discourage sole and mechanistic reliance by investors on credit ratings - is laudable, the amendments it introduces to the CRA Regulation nevertheless include the most radical provisions yet, and some of these may ultimately produce consequences that are both unintended and contrary to the stated theme. Whilst the passage of CRA 3 through the European legislative process resulted in the removal of some controversial proposals, what remains includes two provisions worthy of particular attention: the mandatory rotation of rating agencies for resecuritisations; and a new civil cause of action against rating agencies in favour of investors and issuers for breaches of the CRA Regulation. The result is legislation which risks failing to meet its objective and may even impact on the willingness and ability of rating agencies to provide the breadth of ratings coverage that they have hitherto done.
ACCESSION #
90401975

 

Related Articles

  • RATING OR LOTTO? Hodge, Neil // Financial Management;Oct2008, p18 

    This article focuses on the role of credit rating agencies in the 2008 financial crisis. It explains that credit rating agencies initially did not receive blame in the credit crisis but as the crisis deepens their role is being investigated. It is only proper the credit rating agencies be...

  • Timidity won't redeem rating agencies. Cate, Bert Erikten // EuroProperty;10/19/2009, p13 

    The article presents the author's comments on the rating agencies in Europe which failed to spot the subprime crisis and as a result lost their reputation. The author says that after losing their credibility, the rating agents have become overcautious and now they would adopt a more even-handed,...

  • Credit Rating Agencies' Accountability: Short Notes on a Global Issue. Bussani, Mauro // Global Jurist;Jan2010, Vol. 10 Issue 1, p1 

    In the aftermath of the financial crisis, credit rating agencies (CRAs) have come under open criticism in the public and legal discourse. The picture that has broken the surface is one in which CRAs ended up compromising the quality of their activities in order to facilitate the selling of...

  • Assessing Credit or Determining Quantity? The Evolving Role of Rating Agencies.  // Journal of Applied Finance;2011, Vol. 21 Issue 2, p20 

    Over the past ten years, credit rating agencies have come under intense criticism from both practitioners and academics, first for their failure to identify problems resulting in bankruptcies at Enron and Worldcom and second for providing overly optimistic ratings for structured finance...

  • SQUEAKY WHEEL GETS THE GREASE. Barron, Jacob // Business Credit;Mar2009, Vol. 111 Issue 3, p56 

    The article discusses the need to have a uniform set of requirements among credit rating agencies in order to provide accurate results and assess the global investors. It outlines the conflicts in the financial industry due to the negative influence of the credit rating system as well as the...

  • GRAs to hold AFSL licence.  // Money Management;11/20/2008, Vol. 23 Issue 44, p6 

    The article reports on the regulations established by the Australian government for credit rating agencies (CRAs) and research houses. It states that the regulations require CRAs to have an Australian Financial Services License (AFSL) as well as develop an annual compliance report which will be...

  • Audits Cast Scarlet Letters On Issuers. K. L. // High Yield Report;11/7/2005, Vol. 16 Issue 42, p1 

    Reports on the study which found that the higher financing costs could occur because rating agencies might find it more difficult to make an accurate evaluation and assign a rating, or because investor discomfort prevents investors from taking on additional perceived risk without being better...

  • A Matter of Opinion. Bizouati, YaĆ«l // Investment Dealers' Digest;9/10/2007, Vol. 73 Issue 34, p10 

    The article reports on issues involving rating agencies in the U.S. It has been stated that in the ongoing subprime market turmoil, blame is being heaped on the credit rating agencies. Several market participants assert that even the agencies are taking steps to restore confidence and change...

  • Barely Contained Outrage. Engelen, Klaus C. // International Economy;Fall2008, Vol. 22 Issue 4, p21 

    The article focuses on the reactions from various European countries regarding the financial crisis that originated in the U.S. The issue most upsetting to Europeans is American rating power and the misleading high ratings that the rating duopoly of Moody's and Standard & Poor's gave to what...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics