TITLE

Which Kind of Discretion in Constitutional Adjudication? A Discussion of Mher Arshakyan's The Impact of Legal Systems on Constitutional Interpretation: A Comparative Analysis: The U.S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court

AUTHOR(S)
Arena, Federico José
PUB. DATE
August 2013
SOURCE
German Law Journal;Aug2013, Vol. 14 Issue 8, p1337
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents a discussion of the article "The Impact of Legal Systems on Constitutional Interpretation: A Comparative Analysis: The U.S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court" by Mher Arshakyan. Arshakyan says that there are no differences in the methods of constitutional interpretation in countries with different degree of judicial review.
ACCESSION #
90001628

 

Related Articles

  • The Impact of Legal Systems on Constitutional Interpretation: A Comparative Analysis: The U.S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court. Arshakyan, Mher // German Law Journal;Aug2013, Vol. 14 Issue 8, p1297 

    The article presents a comparative analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court. It examines the impact of legal systems on constitutional interpretation. It aims to demonstrate that there are no differences in the methods of constitutional interpretation in...

  • Terrorism and the Constitution. Poscher, Ralf // Dissent (00123846);Winter2009, Vol. 56 Issue 1, p13 

    In this article the author discusses constitutional issues arising from legal rulings on terrorism in the United States in contrast with similar problems as handled by the German legal system. The U.S. supreme court findings on terrorism and internal security matters differ significantly from...

  • LIVRES NO ESTRANGEIRO, CENSURADAS NO BRASIL. UMA PERSPECTIVA DO DIREITO COMPARADO DA LIBERDADE DE EXPRESSÃO E BIOGRAFIAS. Hartmann, Ivar Alberto // Revista de Direitos Fundamentais & Democracia;jul-dez2013, Vol. 14 Issue 14, p444 

    Art. 20 of the Brazilian Civil Code is commonly interpreted by the Brazilian Judiciary as a clause that forces authors of - especially, but not only - bibliographical works to obtain authorization from all those people mentioned in the text as a condition without which publication cannot ensue....

  • THE SUPREME COURT AND PRIVATE LAW: THE VANISHING IMPORTANCE OF SECURITIES AND ANTITRUST. Sullivan, E. Thomas; Thompson, Robert B. // Emory Law Journal;Fall2004, Vol. 53 Issue 4, p1571 

    The article focuses on the United States Supreme Court, which is not only a constitutional law court but also the final arbiter for much of private law. Its decisions as to the rights of citizens and the powers of government within the framework set by the Constitution and related questions of...

  • COURTS STILL "SAY WHAT THE LAW IS": EXPLAINING THE FUNCTIONS OF THE JUDICIARY AND AGENCIES AFTER BRAND X. Geyser, Doug // Columbia Law Review;Dec2006, Vol. 106 Issue 8, p2129 

    For approximately two decades, courts have followed Chevron's two-step test for reviewing agency interpretations of statutes that they are charged with administering. Tensions have arisen where Chevron deference conflicted with principles of stare decisis, resulting from prior judicial...

  • The Role of the Avoidance Canon in the Roberts Court and the Implications of Its Inconsistent Application in the Court's Decisions. Mcquillen, Molly // Case Western Reserve Law Review;Spring2012, Vol. 62 Issue 3, p845 

    The article presents information on the decision of the Chief Justice of Supreme Court of the U.S. Roberts also known as the Roberts Court regarding the issue of avoidance under the canon law of the country. The Justice is known for his decisions regarding judicial mechanism and the...

  • Critics of the Court.  // America;6/15/1935, Vol. 53 Issue 10, p218 

    The article talks about the criticisms received by the U.S. Supreme Court as of 1935. It is noted that the court has no ability to change the constitution. It cites that those who criticize the current constitutional system have the duty to prove that there would be fewer mistakes under a system...

  • Hammer v. Dagenhart (1919).  // Constitution & the Nation: The Regulatory State, 1890-1945;2003, Vol. 24, p86 

    The article discusses the Child Labor Act passed by the U.S. Congress in 1918. The said act uses the constitutional power over interstate commerce to prohibit the transportation of goods made by factories employing children. Moreover, the U.S. Supreme Court explains that the effect of the act is...

  • Near v. Minnesota (1931).  // Constitution & the Nation: The Regulatory State, 1890-1945;2003, Vol. 24, p103 

    The article presents the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case regarding the conviction of a newspaper publisher. The said newspaper has published malicious, scandalous and defamatory articles against the mayor of Minneapolis, the chief of police, the county attorney and all members of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics