July 2013
Harvard Journal of Law & Gender;Summer2013, Vol. 36 Issue 2, p405
Academic Journal
The sex-based distinctions of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA") have been remarkably resilient in the face of numerous equal protection challenges. In Miller v. Albright, Nguyen v. INS, and most recently United States v. Flores-Villar--collectively the "citizenship transmission cases"--the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutionality of the INA's provisions that require unwed fathers, but not unwed mothers, to take a series of affirmative steps in order to transmit citizenship to their children born abroad. The conventional account of these citizenship transmission cases is that the Court upholds sex-based distinctions that would otherwise fail heightened scrutiny because the immigration and citizenship context in which they arise typically affords plenary power to Congress. This Article argues that the conventional account is incomplete. The citizenship transmission cases are not best understood as examples of immigration law exceptionalism. To the contrary, they are remarkably consistent with the Court's treatment of unwed fathers and mothers in its equal protection jurisprudence generally. An in-depth comparison of the citizenship transmission cases with the Court's decisions regarding the rights of unwed fathers in a variety of other legal contexts reveals a uniform picture of how the Court approaches parental roles in the absence of a marital union--the Court assumes that the absence of legal ties with the father at the time of his child's birth results in his real absence for purposes of establishing both paternity and a father-child relationship. The corollary to the unwed father's absence is the unwed mother's presence--the unwed mother is presumed throughout these decisions to remain with the child. Underlying both the INA and the Court's decisions endorsing the statute is therefore a consistent custody determination: the unwed mother, whether she is foreign or American, is understood to invariably retain custody over the child. This Article evaluates the potential consequences of making explicit the custody determination that is implicit in the Court's citizenship transmission cases uncovering the custody decision assumed by these rules, and assessing it on its own terms, provides reasons to question this recurring sex-based determination. This Article concludes by noting an important limitation of focusing on the gender-related aspects of the statute, namely the exclusion of any discussion concerning its citizenship-related repercussions.


Related Articles

  • Family-Based Immigration: A Jigsaw Puzzle with Warped Pieces. Yamamoto, Rachel // Nebraska Lawyer Magazine;Nov/Dec2013, Vol. 16 Issue 6, p37 

    The article offers the author's view on family-based immigration in the U.S. She mentions that having a qualifying relation with a lawful permanent resident (LPR) is considered a part of the requirement for applying for a legal status or citizenship in the country. An overview of the Immigration...

  • IMMIGRATION'S FAMILY VALUES. Abrams, Kerry; Piacenti, R. Kent // Virginia Law Review;Jun2014, Vol. 100 Issue 4, p629 

    The article discusses the significance of family relationships in U.S. immigration and citizenship law. It examines early U.S. immigration law, the U.S. Nationality Act of 1940, and the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The article discusses the importance of marriage in immigration...

  • Great news for children born 'out of wedlock' to U.S. citizen fathers. GURFINKEL, MICHAEL J. // Filipino Reporter;7/24/2015, Vol. 43 Issue 34, p33 

    The article discusses the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals' ruling about the rights of wedlock children born outside the U.S. to derive American citizenship at birth. Topics discussed include provisions of the U.S. immigration law relating to citizenship for wedlock children born to either...

  • HERE TODAY, GONE TOMORROW: "NULLIFYING" LAWFUL PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS. Arnold, Emily C. // Arizona Law Review;2014, Vol. 56 Issue 2, p527 

    Lawful Permanent Resident (LPR) status is the status awarded to immigrants who have permission to reside permanently and work in the United States. For many, it is a stepping stone to U.S. citizenship. Section 101(a)(20) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) defines LPR status as "having...

  • Status. Taylor, Kelley R. // Principal Leadership;Dec2012, Vol. 13 Issue 4, p8 

    The article focuses on immigration law principles regarding public schools. The use of an enrolling child's birth certificate to provide citizenship or immigration documentation as a violation of the Equal Protection clause of the U.S. Constitution is presented in the court case Hispanic...

  • Single fathers seek their rights. Stachewicz, Rachel // Single Parent;Sep/Oct93, Vol. 36 Issue 4, p42 

    Discusses rights of single fathers and how they can win support of their children. Statistics on number of single fathers; Finding of fathers who have the major responsibility of child care as maintaining a close relationship with their children; Increase of men's rights demands; Financial...

  • THE DECENTRALIZATION OF IMMIGRATION LAW: THE MISCHIEF OF § 287(g). Litwin, Marissa B. // Seton Hall Law Review;2011, Vol. 41 Issue 1, p399 

    In this article the author provides an outline of the history of immigration law in the U.S. which results in the imposition of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The author discusses the former cases of decentralized immigration enforcement and cite employer sanctions and non-federal...

  • A Day in the Life of an IMMIGRATION JUDGE. Harbeck, Judge Dorothy A. // Judges' Journal;Summer2017, Vol. 56 Issue 3, p30 

    In this article, the author shares a typical day's case load in her New Jersey courtroom. IT also discusses about the challenges faced by immigration judges on trials with noncitizens, laws governing immigration in the U.S. such as Immigration and Nationality Act; and the role of U.S. Department...

  • The screening of constitutional rights.  // Las Vegas Business Press;06/14/99, Vol. 16 Issue 23, p4 

    Comments that the proposed changes in the United States immigration law will tarnish the image of the nation as a place where all people can depend on for equal protection. Lessons from the past; Loss of identity as a result of deviation from fundamental principles.


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics