TITLE

Utah legislators seek to make initiative process more difficult and scuttle Initiative B and the Utah Property Act

AUTHOR(S)
Stephenson, Howard
PUB. DATE
December 2002
SOURCE
Enterprise/Salt Lake City;12/2/2002, Vol. 32 Issue 23, p34
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Focuses on issues related to the Utah Supreme Court ruling empowering the right of citizens to initiative and referendum as of December 2002. Implications of the ruling on the limits of Utah legislature on citizens' rights to initiate statutes by direct election; Legislation being prepared by U.S. Senator Bill Hackman on voting requirements; Information on the Initiative B, the Utah Property Act.
ACCESSION #
8624639

 

Related Articles

  • Utah at the Crossroads: The Role of the Judiciary in Initiative and Severability Law after Gallivan v. Walker. Oldroyd, Jaysen // BYU Journal of Public Law;2003, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p367 

    Details the Utah Supreme Court case Gallivan v. Walker on the role of the judiciary in initiative and severability law. Restriction of the initiative power by legislative limitations; Question on the power of legislature to create a nonseverable initiative signature requirement; Use of...

  • Plans for $3.5 billion resort must be approved by voters. Rattie, Barbara // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;2/9/2009, Vol. 38 Issue 33, p4 

    The article reports on the court ruling on plans for the $3.5 billion upscale resort in Beaver County, Utah. The Utah Supreme Court unanimously decided in February 2009 that the plans must be approved by voters of the county. An overview is offered of the actions taken by an organization Save...

  • Top court: lost profits are measure of damages in non-competition cases. Rattle, Barbara // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;12/1/2008, Vol. 38 Issue 23, p1 

    The article considers the ruling of the Utah Supreme Court which stated that the appropriate measure of damages is the former employer's lost profits when an ex-employee breaches contractual non-competition, non-disclosure and employee non-solicitation provisions of a contract. The judges...

  • At Home. Oliver, Daniel // National Review Bulletin;3/12/1976, Vol. 28 Issue 8, p30 

    This article presents information on a decision of the Utah Supreme Court which challenges the claim that the 14th Amendment makes the first ten amendments of the Bill of Rights applicable to states with reference to pornography in the U.S. It is reported that the defendants in the case were...

  • Workers' comp insurance providers win 'significant' Utah court case. Rattle, Barbara // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;4/13/2009, Vol. 38 Issue 42, p1 

    This article reports on the Utah Supreme Court ruling which held that providers of workers' compensation insurance are liable only for the percentage of medical expenses incurred by an injured employee that can be attributed to work. The ruling reverses a Court of Appeals decision that resulted...

  • Top court defines duties of shareholders in closely held firms. Rattle, Barbara // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;10/12/2009, Vol. 39 Issue 16, p1 

    The article reports on the Utah Supreme Court's decision to impose on shareholders in closely held corporations the same duty as partners in a partnership owe one another. In the case involving an appeal by Samuel McLaughlin, a former executive and minority shareholder in Cookietree Inc., the...

  • WHO IS THE UNIVERSITY? BIRNBAUM'S BLACK BOX AND TORT LIABILITY. JAMERSON, NEIL // Journal of College & University Law;2013, Vol. 39 Issue 2, p347 

    The article focuses on tort liability for universities and discusses two cases of the Supreme Court of Utah in this context including Beach v. University of Utah and Webb v. University of Utah. It mentions that these cases represent the Court's stance on the faculty-student relationship...

  • Court Ruling Gives Renewed Clout to Liquidated Damages. Berne, Andrew // ENR: Engineering News-Record;6/24/2013, Vol. 270 Issue 19, pMT28 

    The author views that the ruling of the Utah Supreme Court gives renewed clout to liquidated damages. He thinks that the court's decision affects challenges to the enforceability of liquidated damages. He cites the two-part test followed by the court to determine whether a liquidated damages...

  • Water right change application process still murky. Brown, Mara // Enterprise/Salt Lake City;11/21/2005, Vol. 35 Issue 21, p9 

    The article focuses on the decision of the Utah Supreme court to reconcile cases addressing the water right change application process in the state. The standard of proof required of an applicant for approval of a change application is one of the issues considered by the court. The decision...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics