TITLE

Supreme Court Strikes Down Montana Law, Reaffirms Citizens United

PUB. DATE
July 2012
SOURCE
New American (08856540);7/23/2013, Vol. 28 Issue 14, p8
SOURCE TYPE
Periodical
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article reports on the reaffirmation of the U.S. Supreme Court decision for the court case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) in the case American Tradition Partnership Inc. v. Bullock. It says that the reaffirmation affected the law of Montana state that bans independent expenditures of corporation on behalf of political candidates. The court found that the law violated the freedom of speech.
ACCESSION #
86228169

 

Related Articles

  • The Radical Court: Law unleashed, constitutional questions abound. Cohn, William A. // New Presence: The Prague Journal of Central European Affairs;Summer2010, Vol. 12 Issue 2, p12 

    The article presents an analysis on the controversial rulings and law interpretations of the U.S. Supreme Court with respect to the Citizens United v. FEC. Accordingly, the Supreme Court has ruled that the political spending of corporations cannot be limited because it can violate their free...

  • TWO FAULTY ASSUMPTIONS OF CITIZENS UNITED AND HOW TO LIMIT THE DAMAGE. Ryan, Paul S. // University of Toledo Law Review;Spring2013, Vol. 44 Issue 3, p583 

    The article reflects on faulty assumptions of the U.S. Supreme Court in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission which was regarding constitutionality of political independent expenditure by corporations. It explains how close relationships between political candidates and independent...

  • Corporate Cash May Bend Political Agendas. Zeidner, Rita // HR Magazine;Mar2010, Vol. 55 Issue 3, p18 

    The article focuses on the speculations surrounding the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which expands the First Amendment rights of corporations.

  • Is the Citizens United Decision Hurting Democracy?  // U.S. News Digital Weekly;9/24/2010, Vol. 2 Issue 38, p11 

    The author comments on whether the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the case Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission affects U.S. democracy. In the case, the Court ruled that companies can spend money on political campaigns. The author believes that the ruling does not affect...

  • CORPORATIONS: -ARE NOT PEOPLE-. BLEIFUSS, JOEL // In These Times;Oct2011, Vol. 35 Issue 10, p18 

    The article focuses on the issues involving the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling on the case Citizens United vs Federal Election Commission. It talks about the Supreme Court has ruled that corporations were endowed with the same free speech rights as people. It explores the multi-prolonged strategy...

  • Groups Try to Cut Flow of Election Bucks.  // Multichannel News;1/23/2012, Vol. 33 Issue 4, p25 

    The article focuses on the Citizens United decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruling which permits corporations and unions to fund electioneering advertisements for and against political candidates in the run-up to election primaries. As stated, decision was a financial boon to...

  • Evolution and Revolution at the Supreme Court: How the Court Became "Supreme". Peck, Robert S. // Verdict;Spring2011, Vol. 25 Issue 2, p1 

    The article discusses the evolution of the U.S. Supreme Court. It states that judicial decisions can have a broad effect on society. The position of the Court within government power was said to be not given at its creation. According to the author, the decision in the case Citizens United v....

  • Citizens United. Gizzi, John // Human Events;2/1/2010, Vol. 66 Issue 5, p22 

    The author expresses his views on the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court on the campaign finance case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. He emphasizes that the Supreme Court ruled that corporations and unions are now free to spend their money to support candidates for federal...

  • Courts and Congress Respond to Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Sharkey, Brian P. // Young Lawyer;May2010, Vol. 14 Issue 7, p1 

    The article focuses on the controversies surrounding the judgment of the U.S. Supreme Court in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. It discusses the court's decision to strike down the ban on corporate political expenditure. It further states that court's ruling overturned...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics