TITLE

Proponents of Creationism but not Proponents of Evolution Frame the Origins Debate in Terms of Proof

AUTHOR(S)
Barnes, Ralph; Church, Rebecca
PUB. DATE
March 2013
SOURCE
Science & Education;Mar2013, Vol. 22 Issue 3, p577
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
In Study 1, 72 internet documents containing creationism, ID (intelligent design), or evolution content were selected for analysis. All instances of proof cognates (the word 'proof' and related terms such as 'proven', 'disproof', etc.) contained within these documents were identified and labeled in terms of the manner in which the terms were used. In Study 2, frequency counts for six terms (proof, evidence, establish, experiment, test, trial) were conducted on a sample of peer-reviewed research articles in the journal Science and the 72 internet documents included in Study 1. Quantitative and qualitative analyses revealed that proponents of creationism were much more likely than proponents of evolution to frame the creationism/evolution issue in terms of proof (ID proponents fell partway between the other two). Proponents of creationism frequently described empirical data favoring their position as proof of their position. Even more frequently, proponents of creationism described evolutionary scientists as being engaged in failed attempts to prove the truth of the evolutionary position. Evolution documents included fewer proof cognates than creationism or ID documents and the few proof cognates found in evolution documents were rarely used to describe the status of the theory of evolution. Qualitative data analysis indicated that proof cognates were often used to indicate certainty. The asymmetry between evolution and creationism documents was limited primarily to proof cognates; there were no major asymmetries for the terms evidence, establish, experiment, test, and trial. The results may reveal differences in the epistemological commitments of the involved parties.
ACCESSION #
86169919

 

Related Articles

  • Bad Science: Genetics, as Misread by Creationism. BRANCH, GLENN // GeneWatch;Aug-Oct2013, Vol. 26 Issue 4, p29 

    The article reports on how creationists use the field of genetics to disprove evolution. It discusses the rejection of evolution which advocates the idea of common descent by creationism in favor of supernatural creation, the main division within Christian creationism and the concept of...

  • The Dream World of William Dembski's Creationism. Perakh, Mark // Skeptic;2005, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p54 

    Examines the salient features of William Dembski's creationism or Intelligent Design (ID) concept of humans' origin. Primary premise of the ID concept of humans' origin; Distinctive categories of cause for any event according to Dembski; Weaknesses and flaws of Dembski's philosophy; Mathematical...

  • Creationism's Holy Grail. Weitzerl, Robert // Skeptic;2005, Vol. 11 Issue 4, p66 

    Examines the status of the debate surrounding the validity of the creationism or Intelligent Design (ID) concept of man's origin. Primary premise of the ID concept; Famous individuals who support the ID philosophy; Significance of Stephen Meyer's peer-review article on the public's acceptance of...

  • A JUDGE OF CHARACTER. Chapman, Matthew // Humanist;Jan/Feb2009, Vol. 69 Issue 1, p24 

    This article profiles Judge John E. Jones, who presided over Kitzmiller v. Dover, a controversial trial involving the teaching of evolution. Jones was appointed to his judgeship in 2003 in Pennsylvania. His decision rejected creationism and intelligent design. In 2008, he would receive the...

  • Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.  // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;May-Jun2006, Vol. 26 Issue 3, p23 

    The article reports on the contradiction of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology (FASEB) of teaching intelligent design (ID) and creationism in U.S. schools. FASEB believes that science education has been an important force in driving innovation and discovery. With this,...

  • Other Schools of Thought. Adams, William Lee // Newsweek;11/28/2005, Vol. 146 Issue 22, p57 

    The article focuses on the debate over the teaching of evolution in public schools in the United States. In 1925, high school teacher John Scopes was found guilty of teaching evolution. In 1987, the Supreme Court ruled that the Creationism Act in Louisiana, which promoted the teaching of...

  • Closing Statement for the Plaintiffs in Kitzmiller v Dover. Rothschild, Eric; Hamilton, Pepper // Reports of the National Center for Science Education;Jan-Apr2006, Vol. 26 Issue 1/2, p26 

    The article presents information on the Kitzmiller v. Dover case which was brought to court in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania. The case is about the integration of intelligent design into science curriculum at Dover School Districts headed by William Buckungham and Alan Bonsell who voted to change the...

  • The Judge Who Ruled for Darwin. Ridley, Matt // Time;5/8/2006, Vol. 167 Issue 19, p82 

    The article focuses on Judge John Jones, who ruled against proponents of intelligent design, calling the phrase a relabelling of creationism designed to get around a 1987 judicial ban on teaching creationism as science in public schools. The article discusses the increased impact of the judge's...

  • Darwinism at AEI. Bethell, Tom // American Spectator;Jul/Aug2007, Vol. 40 Issue 6, p44 

    The article presents an account of a panel discussion on Darwinism and conservatism held by the American Enterprise Institute. Extensive critiques of Darwinism as a scientific theory are presented, and the debates among supporters of Darwinism, creationism, and intelligent design are mentioned....

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics