Chao, Bernard
April 2012
UMKC Law Review;Spring2012, Vol. 80 Issue 3, p607
Academic Journal
The article offers information on the reconcilation of foreign and domestic infringement faced by the patent holders in the U.S. It explains all theories related to direct and indirect infringement. Five categories under direct infringing conduct include, preparing, using, offering to sell, selling, and importing a patented creation.


Related Articles

  • METHOD AND MADNESS IN COPYRIGHT LAW. Burk, Dan L. // Utah Law Review;2007, Vol. 2007 Issue 3, p587 

    The article presents an essay regarding the relevance and concept of the U.S. copyright law. It explores the impossibilities and philosophical presumptions about the natural reality that is integrated in the development of the statutes wherein it assumes the different mechanisms in accordance...

  • THE HYPOTHETICAL NEGOTIATION AND REASONABLE ROYALTY DAMAGES: THE TAIL WAGGING THE DOG. Jarosz, John C.; Chapman, Michael J. // Stanford Technology Law Review;May2013, p769 

    Reasonable royalty damages are the predominant form of relief awarded in patent infringement cases and, of late, have been a lightning rod for assertions that the patent protection system is out of control. The primary tool used to assess reasonable royalty damages is the hypothetical...

  • Keeping Your Skepticism out of Court. Bowditch, Peter // Australasian Science;Oct2014, Vol. 35 Issue 8, p45 

    A personal narrative is presented which explores the author's experience of handling legal disputes concerning intellectual property infringement involving businesses.

  • Comments/Letters. Bridbury, Simon // EG: Estates Gazette;8/29/2015, Issue 860, p06 

    A letter to the editor is presented in response to the article "Putting Your Hands Up to the CMA for Infringement," in the August 15, 2015 issue.

  • WHY PATENTEES LITIGATE. Andrews, Damon C. // Columbia Science & Technology Law Review;2011, Vol. 12, p219 

    Several aspects of patent litigation call into question patent holders' motivation for enforcing their exclusionary rights. Indeed, the expense alone can be enough to deter a firm from engaging in litigation, especially if it is likely that the parties will be unable to reach a settlement...

  • Public interest and pharmaceutical preliminary injunctions in Hungary. Tálas, József; Szakács, Eszter // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice;May2013, Vol. 8 Issue 5, p341 

    The Metropolitan Court and Appeal Court have rejected a request for preliminary injunction in a pharmaceutical patent case solely on the grounds of protecting the interests of patients taking the infringing medicine.

  • Solving the Patent Settlement Puzzle. Elhauge, Einer; Krueger, Alex // Texas Law Review;Dec2012, Vol. 91 Issue 2, p283 

    Courts and commentators are sharply divided about how to assess "reverse payment" patent settlements under antitrust law. The essential problem is that a PTO-issued patent provides only a probabilistic indication that courts would hold that the patent is actually valid and infringed, and parties...

  • IP.  // Lawyer;9/17/2012, p12 

    The article focuses on the British court case Bayerische Motoren Werke (BMW) Aktiengesellschaft v. Round & Metal Ltd., which dealt with the infringement of community registered designs.

  • Dutch Supreme Court Tripp Trapp children's chair cases. Koenraad, Hidde // Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice;Dec2013, Vol. 8 Issue 12, p909 

    In three infringement cases, the Dutch Supreme Court (DSC) delivered judgments with significant implications for the (assumed) European harmonization of the copyright protection criteria for works of applied arts. Further, in the Hauck case, the DSC referred questions to the Court of Justice of...


Read the Article


Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics