TITLE

The uncertainty about the social cost of carbon: A decomposition analysis using fund

AUTHOR(S)
Anthoff, David; Tol, Richard
PUB. DATE
March 2013
SOURCE
Climatic Change;Mar2013, Vol. 117 Issue 3, p515
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
We report the results of an uncertainty decomposition analysis of the social cost of carbon as estimated by FUND, a model that has a more detailed representation of the economic impact of climate change than any other model. Some of the parameters particularly influence impacts in the short run whereas other parameters are important in the long run. Some parameters are influential in some regions only. Some parameters are known reasonably well, but others are not. Ethical values, such as the pure rate of time preference and the rate of risk aversion, therefore affect not only the social cost of carbon, but also the importance of the parameters that determine its value. Some parameters, however, are consistently important: cooling energy demand, migration, climate sensitivity, and agriculture. The last two are subject to a large research effort, but the first two are not.
ACCESSION #
85986601

 

Related Articles

  • Some thoughts on the value added from a new round of climate change damage estimates. Yohe, Gary; Hope, Chris // Climatic Change;Mar2013, Vol. 117 Issue 3, p451 

    This paper offers some thoughts on the value added of new economic estimates of climate change damages. We begin with a warning to beware of analyses that are so narrow that they miss a good deal of the important economic ramifications of the full suite of manifestations of climate change. Our...

  • Confronting the challenge of integrated assessment of climate adaptation: a conceptual framework. Wing, Ian; Fisher-Vanden, Karen // Climatic Change;Mar2013, Vol. 117 Issue 3, p497 

    Key limitations of integrated assessment models (IAMs) are their highly stylized and aggregated representation of climate damages and associated economic responses, as well as the omission of specific investments related to climate change adaptation. This paper proposes a framework for modeling...

  • Critical issues for the calculation of the social cost of CO: why the estimates from PAGE09 are higher than those from PAGE2002. Hope, Chris // Climatic Change;Mar2013, Vol. 117 Issue 3, p531 

    PAGE09 is an updated version of the PAGE2002 integrated assessment model (Hope ). The default PAGE09 model gives a mean estimate of the social cost of CO (SCCO) of $106 per tonne of CO, compared to $81 from the PAGE2002 model used in the Stern review (Stern ). The increase is the net result of...

  • Valuing climate impacts in integrated assessment models: the MIT IGSM. Reilly, John; Paltsev, Sergey; Strzepek, Ken; Selin, Noelle; Cai, Yongxia; Nam, Kyung-Min; Monier, Erwan; Dutkiewicz, Stephanie; Scott, Jeffery; Webster, Mort; Sokolov, Andrei // Climatic Change;Mar2013, Vol. 117 Issue 3, p561 

    We discuss a strategy for investigating the impacts of climate change on Earth's physical, biological and human resources and links to their socio-economic consequences. As examples, we consider effects on agriculture and human health. Progress requires a careful understanding of the chain of...

  • Estimating economic effects of changes in climate and water availability. Hurd, Brian; Rouhi-Rad, Mani // Climatic Change;Mar2013, Vol. 117 Issue 3, p575 

    Social, economic, and environmental systems can be vulnerable to disruptions in water supplies that are likely to accompany future climate changes. Coupled with the challenges of tightening environmental regulations, population growth, economic development and fiscal constraints water supply...

  • Implications of simultaneously mitigating and adapting to climate change: initial experiments using GCAM. Calvin, Katherine; Wise, Marshall; Clarke, Leon; Edmonds, Jae; Kyle, Page; Luckow, Patrick; Thomson, Allison // Climatic Change;Mar2013, Vol. 117 Issue 3, p545 

    Most research on future climate change discusses mitigation and impacts/adaptation separately. However, mitigation will have implications for impacts and adaptation. Similarly, impacts and adaptation will affect mitigation. This paper begins to explore these two veins of research simultaneously...

  • Improving the assessment and valuation of climate change impacts for policy and regulatory analysis. Marten, Alex; Kopp, Robert; Shouse, Kate; Griffiths, Charles; Hodson, Elke; Kopits, Elizabeth; Mignone, Bryan; Moore, Chris; Newbold, Steve; Waldhoff, Stephanie; Wolverton, Ann // Climatic Change;Mar2013, Vol. 117 Issue 3, p433 

    An introduction is presented in which the editor discusses various reports within the issue on topics including the evolution of uncertainty analysis, issues related to the impacts of climate change, and role of climate change and environmental stresses in exacerbating violent conflicts.

  • Modeling climate change feedbacks and adaptation responses: recent approaches and shortcomings. Fisher-Vanden, Karen; Sue Wing, Ian; Lanzi, Elisa; Popp, David // Climatic Change;Mar2013, Vol. 117 Issue 3, p481 

    This paper offers a critical review of modeling practice in the field of integrated assessment of climate change and ways forward. Past efforts in integrated assessment have concentrated on developing baseline trajectories of emissions and mitigation scenario analyses. A key missing component in...

  • Untitled. Simpson, Anna // Green Futures;Jul2014, Issue 93, p1 

    The article discusses the concept of "global weirding," described by Center for Postnormal Policy and Futures Studies' John Sweeney as the massive changes that affect the life systems that people have come to rely upon. It emphasizes the significance of understanding the life systems, so as to...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics