TITLE

Mendel and the Path to Genetics: Portraying Science as a Social Process

AUTHOR(S)
Kampourakis, Kostas
PUB. DATE
February 2013
SOURCE
Science & Education;Feb2013, Vol. 22 Issue 2, p293
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
Textbook descriptions of the foundations of Genetics give the impression that besides Mendel's no other research on heredity took place during the nineteenth century. However, the publication of the Origin of Species in 1859, and the criticism that it received, placed the study of heredity at the centre of biological thought. Consequently, Herbert Spencer, Charles Darwin himself, Francis Galton, William Keith Brooks, Carl von Nägeli, August Weismann, and Hugo de Vries attempted to develop theories of heredity under an evolutionary perspective, and they were all influenced by each other in various ways. Nonetheless, only Nägeli became aware of Mendel's experimental work; it has also been questioned whether Mendel even had the intention to develop a theory of heredity. In this article, a short presentation of these theories is made, based on the original writings. The major aim of this article is to suggest that Mendel was definitely not the only one studying heredity before 1900, if he even did this, as may be inferred by textbooks. Although his work had a major impact after 1900, it had no impact during the latter half of the nineteenth century when an active community of students of heredity emerged. Thus, textbooks should not only present the work of Mendel, but also provide a wider view of the actual history and a depiction of science as a social process.
ACCESSION #
85434453

 

Related Articles

  • Anecdotal, Historical and Critical Commentaries on Genetics Darwin and Genetics. Charlesworth, Brian; Charlesworth, Deborah // Genetics;Nov2009, Vol. 183 Issue 3, p757 

    Darwin's theory of natural selection lacked an adequate account of inheritance, making it logically incomplete. We review the interaction between evolution and genetics, showing how, unlike Mendel, Darwin's lack of a model of the mechanism of inheritance left him unable to interpret his own data...

  • Current debates on the origin of species. McBride, Paul D.; Gillman, Len N.; Wright, Shane D. // Journal of Biological Education (Society of Biology);Summer2009, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p104 

    Students are rarely presented with a diversity of viewpoints about evolution and its mechanisms. The historical background to evolution normally suffices: Darwin's journey on The Beagle, his concepts of natural selection and common descent, and an outline of Mendel's experiments. With...

  • Gregor J. Mendel - Genetics Founding Father. SCHWARZBACH, ERIK; SMÝKAL, PETR; DOSTÁL, ONDŘEJ; JARKOVSKÁ, MICHAELA; VALOVÁ, SIMONA // Czech Journal of Genetics & Plant Breeding;2014, Vol. 50 Issue 2, p43 

    Mendel's impact on science is overwhelming. Although based on the number of scientific papers he published he might be considered a meteorologist, his most significant contribution is his study of plant hybrids. This single work puts Mendel on a par with Darwin's evolutionary theory and...

  • What Would Have Happened if Darwin Had Known Mendel (or Mendel's Work)? Lorenzano, Pablo // History & Philosophy of the Life Sciences;2011, Vol. 33 Issue 1, p3 

    The question posed by the title is usually answered by saying that the "synthesis" between the theory of evolution by natural selection and classical genetics, which took place in 1930s-40s, would have taken place much earlier if Darwin had been aware of Mendel and his work. What is more, it...

  • Darwin and Mendel: evolution and genetics. Bizzo, Nelio; El-Hani, Charbel N. // Journal of Biological Education (Society of Biology);Summer2009, Vol. 43 Issue 3, p108 

    Many studies have shown that students' understanding of evolution is low and some sort of historical approach would be necessary in order to allow students to understand the theory of evolution. It is common to present Mendelian genetics to high school students prior to Biological Evolution,...

  • Mendel's opposition to evolution and to Darwin. Bishop, B.E. // Journal of Heredity;May/Jun96, Vol. 87 Issue 3, p205 

    Focuses on Gregor Mendel's opposition to the concept of biological evolution and to Charles Darwin. Antievolutionary content of Mendel's `Pisum' paper; Contradictions between Mendel's and Darwin's theories.

  • The discovery of genes.  // History of Science & Technology;2004, p459 

    The article recounts the discovery of genes. The monk Gregor Mendel is now famous for explaining the laws of heredity, including the roles of dominant and recessive genes and the different mathematical consequences arising from the two types of genes when sexual organisms reproduce. Mendel...

  • The extent of Charles Darwin's knowledge of Mendel. Sclater, Andrew // Journal of Biosciences;Jun2006, Vol. 31 Issue 2, p191 

    The author comments on the extent of biologist Charles Darwin's knowledge of geneticist Gregor Mendel. The articles seeks to correct claims that Darwin is familiar with Mendel's work. It also aims to dispel speculations that results of Mendel's studies held meaning in Darwin's thought. According...

  • The Genetic Revolution.  // National Geographic;Nov2004, Vol. 206 Issue 5, p32 

    Traces a brief history of evolution theory. Discovery of the fundamentals of genetics by Austrian monk Gregor Mendel in Charles Darwin's time; X-ray diffraction photograph by Rosalind Franklin in 1952, which helped James Watson and Francis Crick discover DNA's double-helical structure; Usage of...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics