TITLE

Arbitration

AUTHOR(S)
Rigdon, Dale; Salzillo, Alexander V.
PUB. DATE
September 2012
SOURCE
Georgia State University Law Review;Fall2012, Vol. 29 Issue 1, p334
SOURCE TYPE
Academic Journal
DOC. TYPE
Article
ABSTRACT
The article presents information on the arbitration statute that is one of the most important laws that has been enacted in Georgia. It informs that the Act repeals the previous international transactions portion of the arbitration code and establishes an entirely new framework. It further informs that the Arbitration law in the U.S. has developed significantly since the passage of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).
ACCESSION #
85324037

 

Related Articles

  • LEX NATURALIS AND THE MODERN POLITICAL STATE: RECONCILING THE HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF JURISTIC PHILOSOPHY WITH CONTEMPORARY STATUTORY LEGITIMACY. Crook, Jason A. // Slovenian Law Review;Dec2009, Vol. 6 Issue 1/2, p11 

    Although the debate between the positivist and the naturalist schools over which philosophical approach offers the best explanation of juristic legitimacy may appear to the casual observer to be little more than an exercise in semantics, the consequences of this discussion can have a significant...

  • Who Decides Illegality?  // Dispute Resolution Journal;Aug-Oct2005, Vol. 60 Issue 3, p91 

    The article reports that the Federal Arbitration Act in the U.S. does not prevent arbitrators from deciding that a court should determine whether a contract containing an arbitration clause is illegal in cases where the parties' agreement states that the arbitrator should apply California law,...

  • BANKRUPTCY ACT -- DECISION OF ARBITRATOR NOT AN "UNUSUAL CIRCUMSTANCE"  // Arbitration Journal;Mar1967, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p57 

    The article focuses on the bankruptcy act which states that in the absence of special circumstances, a bankruptcy court is not required to prevent an arbitrator from determining whether a debt has been discharged in bankruptcy, with reference to the court case, Fallick versus Kehr. While the...

  • MILLER ACT -- EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION -- EFFICACY OF ARBITRATION AGREEMENT.  // Arbitration Journal;Mar1967, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p61 

    The article focuses on the Miller Act, a federal act related to the exercise of jurisdiction with reference to the court case, United States versus Essential Construction Co. It is held that where the federal court of Maryland had jurisdiction of a controversy between contractor and...

  • CONFIRMATION OF AWARD -- "WITHIN" 90 DAYS -- PREMATURE COURT ACTION -- MASSACHUSETTS.  // Arbitration Journal;Dec1970, Vol. 25 Issue 4, p277 

    The article focuses on a court case related to the confirmation of award. Where state arbitration statute provides that party must move to vacate award within 30 days, and further states that award will be confirmed unless within the time limits hereinafter imposed grounds are urged for vacating...

  • When Do Statutes of Limitations Apply in Arbitration? Weintraub, David A. // Florida Bar Journal;Oct2007, Vol. 81 Issue 9, p25 

    The article offers information on the application of statutes of limitations in arbitration in Florida. According to the author, courts generally recognize that significant differences exist between the court process and the arbitration process. The circumstances under which statutes of...

  • AWARD--ATTORNEY'S FEES--PENDENT JURISDICTION.  // Arbitration Journal;Dec1966, Vol. 21 Issue 4, p254 

    The article focuses on the decision of a U.S. court, given in the year 1966, in the lawsuit Wilson H. Lee, Inc. v. New Haven Printing Pressmen Local 74. The court decided that the federal court would not, in its discretion, exercise debatable pendent jurisdiction to allow attorney's fees arising...

  • MEDICAL MALPRACTICE--MICHIGAN--MCLA §600.5040 ET SEQ.--CONSTITUTIONALITY--ARBITRATOR BIAS--CONTRACT OF ADHESION.  // Arbitration Journal;Dec77, Vol. 32 Issue 4, p298 

    This article presents the decision by a Michigan court on the case of Pipper v. DiMusto & Saint Joseph's Hospital of Mount Clemens, Michigan. The court held that the Michigan Medical Arbitration Act is constitutional. The plaintiff's primary challenge was of the statute, which permits a doctor...

  • CONSTRUCTION--GOVERNMENTAL PARTY--VALIDITY OF AGREEMENT--IDAHO.  // Arbitration Journal;Mar1984, Vol. 39 Issue 1, p71 

    The article reports an Idaho federal court decision in the case "Bingham City Commission v. Interstate Electric Co." According to the decision, because no statutory prohibition exists against agreements by governmental entities in Idaho to submit disputes to binding arbitration, the county's...

Share

Read the Article

Courtesy of THE LIBRARY OF VIRGINIA

Sorry, but this item is not currently available from your library.

Try another library?
Sign out of this library

Other Topics